• Announces next-generation COVID-19 vaccine candidate as fourth respiratory vaccine to successfully meet its Phase 3 endpoints
  • Expects two more Phase 3 readouts in 2024, including combination vaccine against flu and COVID-19, and vaccine against CMV
  • Announces positive clinical trial data from three new vaccines against viruses that cause significant burden (Epstein-Barr virus, Varicella-Zoster virus, norovirus) and advances programs toward Phase 3 development
  • Anticipates U.S. launch of vaccine against RSV following FDA approval and ACIP recommendation in 2024
  • Announces development and commercialization funding agreement with Blackstone Life Sciences for up to $750 million to advance flu program

CAMBRIDGE, MA / ACCESSWIRE / March 27, 2024 / Moderna, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRNA) today announced at its fifth Vaccines Day event clinical and program updates demonstrating advancement and acceleration of its mRNA pipeline. The updates include data readouts in the Company's respiratory and latent and other vaccine portfolios, as well as commercial, manufacturing and financial announcements for its vaccines business.

"Our mRNA platform continues a remarkable track record across our broad vaccine portfolio. Today, we are excited to share that four vaccines in our pipeline have achieved successful clinical readouts across our respiratory, latent and other virus franchises," said Stéphane Bancel, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna. "With five vaccines in Phase 3, and three more moving toward Phase 3, we have built a very large and diverse portfolio addressing significant unmet medical needs. We are focused on execution to further build momentum across our pipeline and business, and to deliver for patients who are impacted by these infectious diseases."

Portfolio Overview

The vaccine portfolio seeks to address infectious diseases that cause considerable health burdens and includes 28 vaccines addressing respiratory, latent and other pathogens.

Latent and Other Vaccine Portfolio

Moderna is advancing five vaccine candidates against viruses that cause latent infections, all of which are in clinical trials. When latent, a virus is present in the body but exists in a resting state, typically without causing any noticeable symptoms. Latent viruses can reactivate and cause clinical symptoms as a person ages, during times of stress or when immunity is compromised. The capacity for latency is a defining feature of members of the Herpesviridae family, including cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV) and Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV).

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)

CMV is the most common infectious cause of birth defects in the U.S. and is responsible for several billion dollars in annual healthcare costs. One in 200 babies in the U.S. are born with a congenital CMV infection, and of those affected, one in five will have severe, life-altering health problems. Possible short- and long-term sequelae of CMV infection include microcephaly, chorioretinitis, seizures, sensorineural hearing loss, cognitive impairment and cerebral palsy. There is currently no approved vaccine to prevent congenital CMV.

CMVictory is a pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating mRNA-1647 against primary CMV infection in women 16 to 40 years of age. The trial is a randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1647. The trial is fully enrolled with approximately 7,300 participants from 290 clinical sites globally.

To date, 50 primary infection cases have accrued and are undergoing confirmation. The first interim analysis for the evaluation of vaccine efficacy, which will be triggered when both 81 confirmed per-protocol cases and 12 median months of safety follow-up have occurred, is expected as early as the end of 2024.

Moderna's CMV vaccine candidate mRNA-1647 has advanced to indication expansion studies in adolescents 9 to 15 years of age and adult transplant patients, both of which have begun enrollment.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)

EBV is a major cause of infectious mononucleosis (IM) in the U.S., accounting for more than 90% of IM cases annually. Importantly, EBV and IM are associated with a higher lifetime risk of more serious sequelae including certain cancers such as gastric carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and multiple types of lymphoma. The lifetime risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) is increased by 32-fold after EBV infection. There is currently no approved vaccine to prevent EBV.

Moderna's EBV vaccine candidates are designed to tackle multiple EBV-associated conditions, including prevention of IM (mRNA-1189) and MS and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, a subcategory of lymphoma in solid organ transplant patients (mRNA-1195). The Phase 1 trial for mRNA-1189 was designed to test the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of four different dose levels in participants 12 to 30 years of age in the U.S. The randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study showed mRNA-1189 was immunogenic and generally well tolerated across all dose levels. The Company is advancing mRNA-1189 toward a pivotal Phase 3 trial.

The Phase 1 trial for mRNA-1195 was designed to test the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two drug products at four different dose levels in healthy EBV seropositive participants 18 to 55 years of age in the U.S. The randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study is fully enrolled.

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infects approximately 13% of adults globally and is the primary cause of genital herpes. There are an estimated four billion people globally infected with HSV, of which 491 million cases are HSV-2. Recurrent genital herpes causes a reduction in quality of life, which antivirals (current standard of care) only partially restore. Moderna expects that if an HSV vaccine candidate could deliver similar efficacy as a suppressive antiviral treatment, compliance with recommended therapy and associated quality of life would improve. There is currently no approved vaccine to treat HSV-2.

The first in human, fully enrolled Phase 1/2 trial of mRNA-1608 is designed to test safety and immunogenicity and to establish a proof-of-concept of clinical benefit in adults 18 to 55 years of age with recurrent HSV-2 genital herpes. The randomized 1:1:1:1, observer-blind, controlled study is fully enrolled with 300 participants in the U.S.

Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV)

Herpes zoster, also known as shingles, is caused by reactivation of latent VZV, the same virus that causes chickenpox. Declining immunity in older adults decreases immunity against VZV, allowing reactivation of the virus from latently infected neurons, causing painful and itchy lesions. Herpes Zoster occurs in one out of three adults in the U.S. in their lifetime and the incidence increases at 50 years of age. There is potential to reach a growing and underserved patient population.

Moderna's VZV vaccine candidate mRNA-1468 has initial data available from a Phase 1/2 trial, which was designed to test safety and immunogenicity in healthy adults 50 years of age and older in the U.S. The randomized 1:1:1:1:1, observer-blind, active-controlled study of mRNA-1468 elicited strong antigen-specific T cell responses at one month after the second dose and was generally well tolerated. Results of the first interim analysis support the further clinical development of mRNA-1468 for the prevention of shingles. Additional results from the ongoing Phase 1/2 study will be available later this year, including persistence data. The Company is planning for a pivotal Phase 3 trial.

Norovirus

Enteric viruses, including norovirus, are a leading cause of diarrheal diseases, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly among young children and older adults. Norovirus is highly contagious and a leading cause of diarrheal disease globally, associated with 18% of all acute gastroenteritis (AGE), resulting in approximately 200,000 deaths per year and substantial healthcare costs. Given the wide diversity of norovirus genotypes, a broadly effective norovirus vaccine will require a multivalent vaccine design. There is currently no approved vaccine to prevent norovirus.

The randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 trial was designed to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of trivalent (mRNA-1403) and pentavalent (mRNA-1405) norovirus vaccine candidates in 664 participants 18 to 49 years of age and 60 to 80 years of age in the U.S. An interim analysis showed that a single dose of mRNA-1403 elicited a robust immune response across all dose levels evaluated with a clinically acceptable reactogenicity and safety profile. The Company is advancing mRNA-1403 toward a pivotal Phase 3 trial.

Respiratory Vaccine Portfolio

Moderna's approach to ease the global burden of respiratory infections includes vaccine candidates against major causative pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza virus. Respiratory infections are a top cause of death in the U.S. and are particularly harmful to the young, immunocompromised, and older adults who experience more severe illness, greater incidence of hospitalization, and greater mortality than younger adults.

Moderna's respiratory pipeline includes Phase 3 trials for investigational vaccines including a next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, an RSV vaccine, a flu vaccine, and a flu and COVID-19 combination vaccine. The pipeline includes three additional flu vaccine candidates with expanded antigen coverage as well as combination vaccine programs.

COVID-19

Moderna continues to address the needs of the endemic COVID-19 market by focusing on public health efforts to increase vaccination coverage rates to reduce the substantial burden of COVID-19 as well as by advancing next-generation vaccines. The Company's mRNA platform can produce variant-matched vaccines on an accelerated time horizon, consistent with recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) comments on the timing of potential strain selection for the fall booster season.

A recent announcement of positive interim results from the NEXTCove Phase 3 trial showed that mRNA-1283 elicited a higher immune response against both the Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and original virus strains of SARS-CoV-2 compared to mRNA-1273.222, Moderna's licensed COVID-19 vaccine. mRNA-1283 is designed to be refrigerator-stable and paves the way for a combination vaccine against influenza and COVID-19, mRNA-1083, enhancing the Company's overall respiratory portfolio. This is Moderna's fourth infectious disease vaccine program with Phase 3 data.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

RSV is the leading cause of respiratory illness in young children, and older adults are at increased risk relative to younger adults for severe outcomes. In addition to acute mortality and morbidity, RSV infection is associated with long-term sequelae such as asthma and impaired lung function in pediatric populations, and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in older adults. Annually, there are approximately two million medically attended RSV infections and 58,000 to 80,000 hospitalizations in children younger than five years old in the U.S. In the U.S., each year there are up to 160,000 hospitalizations and 10,000 deaths in adults 65 years and older due to RSV. Across high-income countries in 2019, RSV caused an estimated 5.2 million cases, 470,000 hospitalizations and 33,000 in-hospital deaths in adults 60 years and older.

mRNA-1345

Moderna's RSV vaccine candidate, mRNA-1345, is in an ongoing Phase 2/3, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled case-driven trial (ConquerRSV) in adults over 60 years of age. In this study, approximately 37,000 participants from 22 countries were randomized 1:1 to receive one dose of mRNA-1345 or placebo.

Based on positive data from the ConquerRSV trial, Moderna has filed for regulatory approvals for mRNA-1345 for the prevention of RSV-associated lower respiratory tract disease (RSV-LRTD) and acute respiratory disease (ARD) in adults over 60 years of age.

The trial met both its primary efficacy endpoints, with a vaccine efficacy (VE) of 83.7% (95.88% CI: 66.1%, 92.2%; p<0.0001) against RSV-LRTD as defined by two or more symptoms, and a VE of 82.4% (96.36% CI: 34.8%, 95.3%; p=0.0078) against RSV-LRTD defined by three or more symptoms. These data were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December 2023.

A subsequent analysis from the ConquerRSV study with a longer median follow-up duration of 8.6 months (versus 3.7 months in the primary analysis), with a range of 15 days to 530 days, and including subjects from the Northern and Southern Hemispheres was recently presented at the RSVVW'24 conference. In this supplemental analysis, mRNA-1345 maintained durable efficacy, with sustained VE of 63.3% (95.88% CI: 48.7%, 73.7%) against RSV-LRTD including two or more symptoms. VE was 74.6% (95% CI: 50.7%, 86.9%) against RSV-LRTD with ≥2 symptoms, including shortness of breath and 63.0% (95% CI: 37.3%, 78.2%) against RSV-LRTD including three of more symptoms. The stringent statistical criterion of the study, a lower bound on the 95% CI of >20%, continued to be met for both endpoints.

mRNA-1345 has been granted Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA for the prevention of RSV-LRTD in adults over 60 years of age. The Company is awaiting regulatory approvals and the U.S. ACIP recommendation in 2024.

Indication expansion studies for mRNA-1345

mRNA-1345 has the potential to protect all vulnerable populations from RSV. Moderna has initiated multiple Phase 3 expansion studies in adults over 50 years of age to evaluate co-administration and revaccination. Additional trials (Phase 1 - Phase 3) have been initiated for high-risk adults, as well as maternal and pediatric populations. Interim data from these studies could be available as early as 2024.

Influenza (Flu)

Worldwide, influenza leads to 3-5 million severe cases of flu and 290,000-650,000 flu-related respiratory deaths annually. Two main types of influenza viruses (A and B) cause seasonal flu epidemics, and the influenza A viruses lead to most flu-related hospitalization in older adults.

The Company has several seasonal influenza vaccine candidates in clinical development. Moderna's seasonal flu vaccine, mRNA-1010, demonstrated consistently acceptable safety and tolerability across three Phase 3 trials. In the most recent Phase 3 trial (P303), which was designed to test the immunogenicity and safety of an optimized vaccine composition, mRNA-1010 met all immunogenicity primary endpoints, demonstrating higher antibody titers compared to a currently licensed standard-dose flu vaccine. In an older adult extension study of P303, mRNA-1010 is being studied against high dose Fluzone HD®; the trial is fully enrolled. The Company is in ongoing discussions with regulators and intends to file in 2024.

Combination Respiratory Vaccines

Moderna's combination vaccine candidates cover respiratory viruses associated with the largest disease burden in the category. The Phase 3 combination study of the Company's investigational combination vaccine against flu and COVID-19 (mRNA-1083) for adults aged 50 years and older is fully enrolled and data are expected in 2024. mRNA-1083 was granted Fast Track designation by the FDA in May 2023.

Commercial Updates

Respiratory viruses in addition to latent and other viruses represent large unmet or underserved medical needs, and the human and economic costs from these infectious diseases highlight the need for effective vaccines. To help address this need, Moderna expects multiple vaccine product launches in the next few years, each with significant addressable markets.

The 2024 global endemic COVID-19 vaccine market alone is estimated by Moderna to be approximately $10 billion. COVID-19 continues to show a high burden of disease, and while COVID-19 hospitalizations remain high relative to RSV and flu, the risks of Long COVID are also becoming better understood. Moderna is focused on improving education and awareness to increase vaccination rates as Long COVID data suggests even traditionally low-risk groups should be vaccinated. Moderna is also working with health authorities to align the timing of COVID-19 and flu vaccine launches to help improve public health.

For RSV, Moderna estimates the peak annual market to be approximately $10 billion. The Company expects a strong RSV vaccine launch into a large market in 2024. As the only mRNA investigational vaccine with positive Phase 3 data, Moderna's RSV vaccine candidate has a strong profile with consistently strong efficacy across vulnerable and older populations, a well-established safety and tolerability profile, and ease of administration with a ready-to-use, pre-filled syringe formulation, which could relieve some of the burden that falls on pharmacies during the fall vaccination season.

An interim analysis from an ongoing time and motion study evaluating differences in preparation time between a pre-filled syringe (PFS) presentation and vaccines that require reconstitution showed that a PFS presentation could relieve some of the burden that falls on pharmacies during the fall vaccination season. Results from this study suggest that pharmacies may be capable of preparing up to four times as many doses of PFS in an hour compared to vaccines requiring reconstitution.

Moderna estimates flu vaccines represent an approximately $7 billion market in 2024. The market is expected to grow with the rise of more effective vaccines and there is an opportunity to expand the market with next-generation premium flu vaccines as well as combination respiratory vaccines, adding increased value to the health ecosystem.

CMV is expected to be a $2-5 billion annual market. With no vaccine currently on the market and a potential vaccine launch in 2026, Moderna could be the first CMV vaccine in multi-billion-dollar latent vaccine market. In addition, EBV has the potential to address and reduce the burden and cost of EBV infection in multiple populations, while VZV provides the opportunity to enter a large and growing market, which could be $5-6 billion annually. The market for norovirus vaccines is similar to that of rotavirus in pediatrics with opportunity to expand into the adult population, and represents a $3-6 billion annual market.

Moderna's vaccine portfolio targets large addressable markets, with an estimated total addressable market (TAM) of $52 billon for Moderna infectious disease vaccines, which includes a respiratory vaccines TAM of more than $27 billion and a latent and other vaccines TAM of more than $25 billion.

Manufacturing

The Company's manufacturing innovation supports expanding commercialization of a diverse pipeline through efficiency and productivity gains. Its mRNA manufacturing platform enables benefits such as quality, speed, scale and cost efficiency across a footprint that broadly includes the manufacture of plasmid, mRNA, lipid nanoparticles, as well as fill/finish and quality control capabilities.

As the Company continues to build its footprint for the future, it is developing an agile global manufacturing network to meet commercial demand and support its growing pipeline. Pre-clinical through commercial manufacturing occurs at the Moderna Technology Center in Norwood, Massachusetts, which remains central to the Company's network. New facilities being constructed in Australia, Canada and the UK are expected to come online in 2025, and drug product capacity is achieved through a flexible contract manufacturing network. Additionally, the Company has purchased and started build-out of a manufacturing site in Marlborough, Massachusetts, to enable commercial scale of its individualized neoantigen therapy program.

By continuing to pioneer new technologies, including advanced robotics, applying AI and other digital solutions, and driving network and capital efficiency, Moderna's manufacturing network is expected to also drive more predictable cost of sales.

Research and Development Investment Strategy

Today's updates provide further evidence that Moderna's mRNA technology platform is working, and with a rate of success higher than industry standard. Looking ahead, research and development will continue to be the Company's top capital allocation priority.

As Moderna looks to create value through the research and development strategy for its vaccine portfolio, it is taking three prioritization parameters into consideration: pipeline advancement, revenue diversification and risk reduction. As part of its strategy, the funding options Moderna considers are self-funding, project financing and partnerships.

Moderna recently entered into a development and commercialization funding agreement with Blackstone Life Sciences to advance the Company's flu program. As part of the agreement, Blackstone will fund up to $750 million with a return based on cumulative commercial milestones and low-single digit royalties. Moderna expects to recognize the funding as a reduction in research and development expenses and will retain full rights and control of the Company's flu program. This funding does not result in any change to Moderna's 2024 research and development framework of approximately $4.5 billion.

About Moderna

Moderna is a leader in the creation of the field of mRNA medicine. Through the advancement of mRNA technology, Moderna is reimagining how medicines are made and transforming how we treat and prevent disease for everyone. By working at the intersection of science, technology and health for more than a decade, the company has developed medicines at unprecedented speed and efficiency, including one of the earliest and most effective COVID-19 vaccines.


Moderna's mRNA platform has enabled the development of therapeutics and vaccines for infectious diseases, immuno-oncology, rare diseases and autoimmune diseases. With a unique culture and a global team driven by the Moderna values and mindsets to responsibly change the future of human health, Moderna strives to deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. For more information about Moderna, please visit modernatx.com and connect with us on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn.

INDICATION (U.S.)

SPIKEVAX (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is a vaccine indicated for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals 18 years of age and older.

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

  • Do not administer to individuals with a known history of severe allergic reaction (e.g., anaphylaxis) to any component of the vaccine.
  • Appropriate medical treatment to manage immediate allergic reactions must be immediately available in the event an acute anaphylactic reaction occurs following administration of the vaccine.
  • Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. The observed risk is higher among males under 40 years of age than among females and older males. The observed risk is highest in males 18 through 24 years of age.
  • Syncope (fainting) may occur in association with administration of injectable vaccines. Procedures should be in place to avoid injury from fainting.
  • Immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressive therapy, may have a diminished response to the vaccine.
  • The vaccine may not protect all vaccine recipients.
  • Adverse reactions reported in clinical trials following administration of the vaccine include pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, nausea/vomiting, axillary swelling/tenderness, fever, swelling at the injection site, and erythema at the injection site, and rash.
  • The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of certain adverse events to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) online at vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html or by calling 1-800-822-7967.
  • Please see the SPIKEVAX Full Prescribing Information. For information regarding authorized emergency uses of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, please see the EUA Fact Sheet.

Spikevax® is a registered trademark of Moderna.
Fluzone® is a registered trademark of Sanofi Pasteur.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including statements regarding: the advancement of Moderna's programs under clinical development; the timing for anticipated approvals of vaccine candidates; the efficacy, safety and tolerability of vaccine candidates; the total addressable markets for programs under development; the efficiencies and advantages of Moderna's mRNA platform; future capital allocation and financing efforts; and anticipated spending for R&D in 2024. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "will," "may," "should," "could," "expects," "intends," "plans," "aims," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "continue," or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain these words. The forward-looking statements in this press release are neither promises nor guarantees, and you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are beyond Moderna's control and which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties, and other factors include, among others, those risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Risk Factors" in Moderna's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and in subsequent filings made by Moderna with the SEC, which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. Except as required by law, Moderna disclaims any intention or responsibility for updating or revising any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation in the event of new information, future developments or otherwise. These forward-looking statements are based on Moderna's current expectations and speak only as of the date of this press release. ​

###

Moderna Contacts

Media:
Chris Ridley
Head, Global Media Relations
+1 617-800-3651
[email protected]

Investors:
Lavina Talukdar
Senior Vice President & Head of Investor Relations
+1 617-209-5834
[email protected]

SOURCE: Moderna, Inc.

View the original press release on accesswire.com

Source link

Introduction

The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has become an essential non-invasive oxygen therapy device. Recently, it has been used widely in clinical settings as a non-invasive respiratory support method to improve oxygenation in adult patients.1 HFNC has several advantages over conventional low-flow devices (eg, nasal cannula or simple face masks): enhanced patient comfort, increased humidification, improved secretion clearance and reduced effort in breathing.2,3 The HFNC system is a unique device that is simple and easy to use, needing only an active heated humidifier, flow generator, single circuit, and soft nasal cannula.4 This device was developed to maintain high oxygen flow and improve the efficiency of ventilation by delivering warmed and humidified oxygen with a flow rate as high as 60 L/minute and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.21 to 1.0. An increased flow rate can help reduce inspiratory effort and improve dynamic lung compliance, which can lead to improving oxygenation and ventilation.1,5,6 During the COVID-19 pandemic, several studies showed that the use of HFNC as an alternative oxygen device for respiratory failure patients can provide higher oxygen concentrations than can be achieved with conventional devices, reduce the need for endotracheal intubation, and decrease the length of stay in intensive care units (ICUs).7–9 In addition, HFNC has a valuable effect in reducing anatomical dead space, which provides low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and can be more tolerable for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).10 Moreover, the immediate use of HFNC for postoperative respiratory failure patients was associated with lower risks of reintubation and respiratory failure.11

Even though the use of HFNC is prevalent in clinical settings, RTs still lack evidence-based guidelines for implementing HFNC.12 Moreover, HFNC is frequently utilized by RTs but controversy remains on the initiation, management and weaning of HFNC due to scant evidence.12–14 A cross-sectional study of French ICU physicians found that there was a great deal of variability in the current use of HFNC, including the criteria for initiation and weaning.15 Furthermore, a global survey of intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare providers reported that there was considerable variation in the daily application of HFNC with regard to initial settings and management criteria for HFNC parameters.16 HFNC failure may result from these notable differences in clinical practice, which is probably due to lack of educational training and standardized protocols.17

Despite the wide use of HFNC and the studies exploring the benefits of using HFNC with ARDS patients, research into assessing the knowledge, practice, and barriers to using HFNC among respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the current practice of HFNC in multiple centers in Saudi Arabia and identify the barriers to using HFNC among respiratory therapists.

Methods

Study Design

In this cross-sectional study, a survey was distributed through an electronic platform SurveyMonkey between December 19, 2022, and July 15, 2023.

Instrument

Experts in the use of HFNC (namely ICU physicians, respiratory therapists, and ICU nurses) formulated this questionnaire, which was adapted and modified from previous studies.8,15,16,18 Next, face and content validity were assessed by an expert panel and the survey was then pilot-tested. After receiving feedback from the experts, adjustments were made, and the survey was distributed. The survey consisted of six main parts:

  • The first part asked the participants about their demographic information (eg, gender, number of years working in critical care areas, and geographical location).
  • The second part focused on assessing the study participants’ knowledge of indications for the use of HFNC. This part consists of 13 statements with a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly agree; 5 = strongly disagree).
  • The third part consisted of four statements with a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly agree; 5 = strongly disagree). This section assessed whether respiratory therapists agree that 1) the HFNC device is tolerable for patients, 2) HFNC is used to help patients eat and speak, 3) HFNC improves dyspnea, and 4) HFNC is used to avoid the need for intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • The fourth part assessed the study participants’ ability to determine the timing for switching to HFNC, the most appropriate initial settings for HFNC, the management of patients on HFNC, and the criteria required for weaning.
  • The fifth part consisted of four statements to evaluate whether the study participants were aware of the criteria for HFNC failure and the time to intubate and use invasive mechanical ventilation.
  • The last part consisted of one question about barriers to HFNC use.

Data Collection and Sampling

A convenience sampling strategy was used to recruit the study participants, and the main target population for this study were respiratory therapists who work in Saudi Arabian hospitals and hold a bachelor degree. To reach a larger population of respiratory therapists, we distributed the survey through Saudi scientific non-profit organizations (eg, the Saudi Society for Respiratory Care) along with social media platforms (X and WhatsApp). In addition, each data collector visited and circulated the survey to respiratory therapists working at their nearby tertiary hospitals.

Data Analysis

The collected data were managed and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27. Data were presented as means and standard deviation or frequency and percentages, as appropriate. A Chi-square test was used to compare RT staff who have existing HFNC protocols and those who do not. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Approval

Before the commencement of the study, ethical approval was obtained from the Bioethical Committee at Batterjee Medical College (Reference Number RES-2022-0077).

Results

Participant Characteristics

In this study, 1001 RT practitioners completed the online survey. Over half of the participants were female (573, or 57.2%). The majority of our sample was staff specialists (824, or 82.3%), while directors of RT departments accounted for 29 (2.9%). High numbers of representatives were from the country’s Western and Central Regions (52.8% and 26.4%, respectively). More than half (56.1%) of the participants had one to five years of clinical experience. In addition, we documented the areas where the respiratory therapists were assigned, such as critical care (78.6%), non-critical care (65.5%), and ER (57.9%). Two-thirds of the respiratory therapists (659, or 65.8%) had received training on HFNC and 785 (78.4%) had used HFNC in clinical settings. (See Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic Data and Characteristics of Study Respondents (n = 1001)

Indications of Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula from the Perspective of RT Staff

We asked the participants if they agreed about the relevant indications or conditions that require HFNC. The top responses were COVID-19 (78%), post-extubation (65%), and do-not-intubate patients (64%). The lowest responses were pre-oxygenated patients before intubation (38%), obesity-induced hypoventilation syndrome (34%), and sleep apnea syndrome (33%). (See Table 1 and Figure 1).

Figure 1 Indications for using HFNC from the perspective of RT staff (n=1001).

Advantages of Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Four advantages of HFNC (ie, has high tolerability, helps maintain conversation and eating abilities, improves shortness of breath (SOB), and avoids intubation) were reported from the perspective of respiratory therapists. Participants strongly agreed that the advantages of HFNC were helping to maintain conversation and eating abilities (32.95%) and improving SBO (34.1%) (See Table 2 and Figure 2).

Table 2 Advantages of Using HFNC from the Perspective of RT Staff

Figure 2 Advantages of using HFNC from the prospective of RT staff (n=1001).

Initial Settings, Weaning and Disconnect of High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Surprisingly, 568 (57%) of RT staff do not follow a protocol for initiation, weaning and disconnection of HFNC with ARDS patients.

When starting HFNC, 40.2% of the participants started with FiO2 of 61% to 80%. Additionally, a high percentage of RT staff (40.6%) started with a flow rate between 30 L/minute and 40 L/minute and a temperature of 37°C (57.7%). When weaning ARDS patients from HFNC, 482 (48.1%) recommended first reducing gas flow by 5–10 L/minute every two to four hours, followed by 362 (36.2%) who recommended first reducing FiO2 by 5–10% every two to four hours. Moreover, 549 (54.8%) believed that ARDS patients could be disconnected from HFNC if they achieved a flow rate < 20 L/minute and FiO2 <35%. (See Table 3).

Table 3 Clinical Practice of HFNC

In addition, we compared the responses between participants who followed a standardized protocol versus those who did not follow a protocol to initiate, wean and disconnect HFNC. (See Table 3).

Of the 402 RT staff who would start with FiO2 between 61% and 80%, 289 (28.87%) reported not following a standardized protocol. Additionally, half of the RT staff (214, or 21.42%) who would start with a flow rate between 30 and 40 L/minute do not have a standardized protocol to follow. Among all participants, we observed a statistically significant difference between respiratory therapists who follow a protocol versus those who do not (p-value <0.001). For those who recommended first reducing gas flow by 5–10 L/minute every two to four hours when weaning ARDS patients, 356 (35.51%) did not follow a standardized protocol. Among all participants, we observed statistically significant differences between respiratory therapists who follow a protocol and those who do not follow a protocol (p-value <0.001). (See Table 3).

Criteria to Stop High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Intubate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients

Regarding the criteria to stop providing HFNC and initiate intubation, 39.5% of the participants would stop providing HFNC if the patient paused or stopped breathing. Indeed, 34.7% of the participants would stop providing HFNC in cases of refractory hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90% with FiO2 100% and flow rate of 60 L/minute), 35% in cases of severe respiratory acidosis (pH is unacceptably low (<7.25) and the PaCO2 is elevated), and 39.3% in cases of reduced level of consciousness (GCS score ≤8). (See Table 4).

Table 4 Criteria to Stop HFNC and Intubate ARDS Patients

Challenges in Using High-Flow Nasal Cannula

Regarding the challenges that impede the use of HFNC, participants ranked lack of knowledge, lack of devices, and the absence of protocol as the highest challenges (57.3%, 49.6, and 49%, respectively) while lack of evidence and diversity of HFNC devices were the lowest challenges 34.5% and 17.2%, respectively. (See Figure 3).

Figure 3 Challenges toward using HFNC from the perspective of RT staff (n=1001).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first national study to shed light on the knowledge, attitudes, and current practice of HFNC in ARDS patients among respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia and the barriers to its use in clinical settings. The study findings revealed nuanced applications marked by significant endorsement in certain clinical scenarios and a lack of protocol adherence, underscoring the need for uniform, evidence-based guidelines and enhanced training for respiratory therapists.

A significant finding in our study is the prominent endorsement of HFNC use in COVID-19 patients, post-extubation cases, and do-not-intubate patients. These results corroborate existing literature that underscores HFNC’s role in enhancing oxygenation and reducing the effort of breathing in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.2,3 Similarly, a cross-sectional study disclosed that respiratory physicians in Japan regarded COVID-19 as a primary indicator for HFNC application given its propensity to reduce the frequency of sustained sedation, physical restraint, and length of stay in the ICU compared to patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV).8 Nevertheless, the lower agreement on HFNC’s application in pre-oxygenation, obesity-induced hypoventilation, and sleep apnea conditions indicates potential knowledge gaps or diverse clinical experiences that warrant further investigation.

HFNC therapy has garnered widespread clinical validation for its efficacy in the management of patients with ARDS. Its capacity to deliver a precise and adjustable flow of warmed, humidified oxygen optimizes patient comfort and oxygenation status and decreases respiratory distress symptoms and the risk of endotracheal intubation.19,20 Within the scope of the present study, a substantial level of consensus was observed among participants, indicating that HFNC application is associated with a notable amelioration of SOB while concurrently preserving speech and eating capabilities. In line with these findings, previous literature has demonstrated the superiority of HFNC over alternative non-invasive respiratory modalities, underscored by its high patient tolerance and preservation of patients’ daily activities, emphasizing HFNC’s pivotal role in enhancing patient-centered outcomes.8

In the current study, significant discrepancies were observed in the setting of initial parameters, weaning strategies, and disconnection criteria pertaining to HFNC. Specifically, a majority of respiratory therapists reported an initial application of FiO2 within the range of 60% to 80%, a flow rate of 30–40 L/minute, and a temperature of 37°C. Notably, these findings are inconsistent with established HFNC protocols, which advocate initiating FiO2 at 1.00, a flow rate of 60 L/minute, and a temperature of 37°C.21,22 Furthermore, a substantial proportion of respiratory therapists expressed a preference for initially weaning the flow rate by 5–10 L/minute every two to four hours, deviating from the guidelines stipulated by the Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists, which prioritize reducing FiO2 to less than 40% before commencing a gradual decrement in flow rate by increments of five.21 Analogously, heterogeneous practices were observed among French ICU physicians during the weaning process of HFNC settings.15 Despite these variations, a significant consensus emerged among over half of the respiratory therapists regarding the disconnection of HFNC, advocating for disconnection when the FiO2 is below 35% and the flow rate falls below 20 L/minute, aligning with published guidelines.1,21 A noteworthy revelation is the lack of adherence to standardized protocols for initiating, weaning, and disconnecting HFNC for ARDS patients. This inconsistency in clinical practices underscores the urgent need for the development and dissemination of evidence-based guidelines to enhance the quality and consistency of patient care.

Regarding the criteria dictating the transition from HFNC therapy to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS, our study revealed a moderate consensus. This alignment was substantiated through the initiation of endotracheal intubation in cases of spontaneous breathing cessation, refractory hypoxemia, severe respiratory acidosis, or diminished consciousness. Concomitantly, a subsequent study yielded analogous outcomes, thereby affirming our findings. Notably, it illuminated the exacerbation of respiratory distress and the presence of bronchial congestion as substantive contributors to the ineffectiveness of HFNC therapy, consequently augmenting the imperative for invasive ventilation.15 Additionally, a retrospective analysis furnished empirical evidence identifying hypoxemic and hypercapnic respiratory failure as crucial indicators denoting the failure of HFNC therapy, particularly in scenarios wherein patients cannot sustain SpO2 above 90% despite receiving maximal FiO2. This insufficiency is accentuated by concomitant findings of arterial pH below 7.3 and respiratory rates exceeding 35 breaths per minute.23 The diverse criteria employed by respiratory therapists to discontinue HFNC and commence intubation emphasize the need for standardization in this aspect. Precisely articulated and evidence-based criteria are instrumental in optimizing patient outcomes and mitigating the potential risks associated with delayed intubation.

Several barriers impede the widespread adoption of HFNC therapy in clinical settings. In the present study, RT staff identified a lack of knowledge, the unavailability of devices, and the absence of protocols as the foremost challenges hindering the optimal use of HFNC. In accordance with these results, existing literature has shown that a lack of skill and familiarity hampers the implementation of HFNC in the ICU.24,25 Likewise, a pertinent study revealed that the absence of established objective criteria for initiating and managing HFNC settings significantly restricts its application, potentially leading to ineffective healthcare practices.26 These findings underscore the necessity for targeted interventions to enhance the capabilities of respiratory therapists, ensure the availability of essential equipment, and establish evidence-based protocols and the importance of concerted efforts to fortify strengths and mitigate the challenges associated with HFNC application in clinical settings.

Strengths and Limitations

One of the notable strengths of this study is the breadth of the participant sample, offering a robust spectrum of insights and experiences from a diverse group of respiratory therapists. The comprehensive survey methodology enabled the capture of nuanced, multifaceted data, allowing for a granular analysis of HFNC practices and challenges. Additionally, the alignment of the study’s findings with existing literature accentuates its validity and contribution to the ongoing discourse on the clinical applications of HFNC. Nevertheless, the study has limitations. We did not assess the current practice and barriers of using HFNC from the prospective of physicians whose practices maybe different from RTs. The reliance on self-reported data introduces the potential for response biases, wherein participants might either consciously or unconsciously misreport their practices. The cross-sectional nature of the study design precludes causal inferences and the assessment of HFNC practice evolution over time. Moreover, the geographical and institutional diversity of participants, while a strength, also raises questions about the generalizability of the findings across different contexts and healthcare systems.

Conclusion

Respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia demonstrated a profound understanding of the clinical advantages associated with the utilization of HFNC for adult patients with ARDS. However, significant discrepancies were observed concerning the setting of initial parameters, the formulation of weaning strategies, and the determination of disconnection criteria related to HFNC. These variations primarily stemmed from inadequate adherence to established protocols and limitations in available resources. Such observations underscore the imperative for the development and implementation of standardized, evidence-based guidelines, alongside comprehensive training initiatives aimed at enhancing respiratory therapists’ compliance with HFNC protocols.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved from Bioethical Committee at Batterjee Medical College (Reference Number RES-2022-0077) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all RTs participated in the study.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

There is no financial supporting body for this study.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Park S. High-flow nasal cannula for respiratory failure in adult patients. Acute Crit Care. 2021;36(4):275–285. doi:10.4266/acc.2021.01571

2. Qaseem A, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Fitterman N, Williams JW Jr, Kansagara D; Physicians CGCotACo. Appropriate use of high-flow nasal oxygen in hospitalized patients for initial or postextubation management of acute respiratory failure: a clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Internal Med. 2021;174(7):977–984. doi:10.7326/M20-7533

3. Papazian L, Corley A, Hess D, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in ICU adults: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(9):1336–1349. doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4277-8

4. Nishimura M. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy devices. Respir Care. 2019;64(6):735–742. doi:10.4187/respcare.06718

5. Mauri T, Alban L, Turrini C, et al. Optimum support by high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: effects of increasing flow rates. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(10):1453–1463. doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4890-1

6. Mauri T, Turrini C, Eronia N, et al. Physiologic effects of high-flow nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(9):1207–1215. doi:10.1164/rccm.201605-0916OC

7. Gürün A, Öz M, Erol S, Çiftçi F, Çiledağ A, Kaya A. High flow nasal cannula in COVID-19: a literature review. Tuberk Toraks. 2020;68(2):168–174. doi:10.5578/tt.69807

8. Koyauchi T, Suzuki Y, Inoue Y, et al. Clinical practice of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in COVID-19 pandemic era: a cross-sectional survey of respiratory physicians. Respir Invest. 2022;60(6):779–786. doi:10.1016/j.resinv.2022.08.007

9. Sayan İ, Altınay M, Çınar AS, et al. Impact of HFNC application on mortality and intensive care length of stay in acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia. Heart Lung. 2021;50(3):425–429. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.02.009

10. Millar J, Lutton S, O’Connor P. The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy in the management of hypercarbic respiratory failure. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2014;8(2):63–64. doi:10.1177/1753465814521890

11. Hernández G, Vaquero C, González P, et al. Effect of postextubation high-flow nasal cannula vs conventional oxygen therapy on reintubation in low-risk patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(13):1354–1361. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.2711

12. Alnajada A, Blackwood B, Messer B, Pavlov I, Shyamsundar M. International survey of high-flow nasal therapy use for respiratory failure in adult patients. J Clin Med. 2023;12(12):3911. doi:10.3390/jcm12123911

13. Puah SH, Li A, Cove ME, et al. High-flow nasal cannula therapy: a multicentred survey of the practices among physicians and respiratory therapists in Singapore. Aust Crit Care. 2022;35(5):520–526. doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2021.08.001

14. Alnajada A, Shyamsundar M, Messer B, Pavlov I. North American Survey of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy Use. A42 ARF/ARDS. American Thoracic Society; 2022:A5535–A5535.

15. Besnier E, Hobeika S, NSeir S, et al. High-flow nasal cannula therapy: clinical practice in intensive care units. Ann Intens Care. 2019;9:1–8.

16. Li J, Tu M, Yang L, et al. Worldwide clinical practice of high-flow nasal cannula and concomitant aerosol therapy in the adult ICU setting. Respir Care. 2021;66(9):1416–1424. doi:10.4187/respcare.08996

17. Wen R, Hu X, Wei T, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: evaluation of the perceptions of various performance aspects among Chinese clinical staff and establishment of a multidimensional clinical evaluation system. Front Med. 2022;9:900958. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.900958

18. Hosheh O, Edwards CT, Ramnarayan P. A nationwide survey on the use of heated humidified high flow oxygen therapy on the paediatric wards in the UK: current practice and research priorities. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):109. doi:10.1186/s12887-020-1998-1

19. Abdelbaky AM, Elmasry WG, Awad AH, Khan S, Jarrahi M. The impact of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: a systematic review. Cureus. 2023;15(6):1.

20. Lee CC, Mankodi D, Shaharyar S, et al. High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review. Respir Med. 2016;121:100–108. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2016.11.004

21. Ischaki E, Pantazopoulos I, Zakynthinos S. Nasal high flow therapy: a novel treatment rather than a more expensive oxygen device. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26(145):170028. doi:10.1183/16000617.0028-2017

22. Vianello A, Arcaro G, Molena B, et al. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to treat patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure consequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thorax. 2020;75(11):998–1000. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214993

23. Kang BJ, Koh Y, Lim C-M, et al. Failure of high-flow nasal cannula therapy may delay intubation and increase mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(4):623–632. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-3693-5

24. O’Brien SL, Haskell L, Tavender EJ, et al. Factors influencing health professionals’ use of high-flow nasal cannula therapy for infants with bronchiolitis–A qualitative study. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1098577. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1098577

25. Jackson JA, Spilman SK, Kingery LK, et al. Implementation of high-flow nasal cannula therapy outside the intensive care setting. Respir Care. 2021;66(3):357–365. doi:10.4187/respcare.07960

26. Horvat CM, Pelletier JH. High-flow nasal cannula use and patient-centered outcomes for pediatric bronchiolitis. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2130927–e2130927. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30927

Source link

By evaluating sound vibrations produced by the airflow induced within the lungs and bronchial tree during normal breathing as well as those produced by the larynx during vocalizations, doctors can identify potential disease-related abnormalities within the respiratory system. In AIP Advances, researchers demonstrate the efficacy of ultrasound technology to detect low-amplitude movements produced by vocalizations at the surface of the chest. They also demonstrated the possibility of using the airborne ultrasound surface motion camera to map these vibrations during short durations so as to illustrate their evolution.

The thorax, the part of the body between the neck and abdomen, provides medical professionals with a valuable window into a patient's respiratory health. By evaluating sound vibrations produced by the airflow induced within the lungs and bronchial tree during normal breathing as well as those produced by the larynx during vocalizations, doctors can identify potential disease-related abnormalities within the respiratory system.

But, among other shortcomings, common respiratory assessments can be subjective and are only as good as the quality of the exam. While the advent of multipoint electronic stethoscopes has helped in terms of identifying abnormalities during normal breathing, there remains a dearth of technological devices that can help characterize surface vibrations produced by vocalizations.

In AIP Advances, by AIP Publishing, a team of French researchers demonstrated the efficacy of ultrasound technology to detect low-amplitude movements produced by vocalizations at the surface of the chest. They also demonstrated the possibility of using the "airborne ultrasound surface motion camera" (AUSMC) to map these vibrations during short durations so as to illustrate their evolution.

"AUSMC is a new imaging technology that allows the observation of the human thorax surface vibrations due to respiratory and cardiac activities at high frame rates of typically 1,000 images per second," said author Mathieu Couade. "The technology shares the physical principle of conventional ultrasound Doppler imaging, but it does not require a probe to be applied on the skin."

The researchers tested the AUSMC on 77 healthy volunteers to image the surface vibrations caused by natural vocalizations with the aim of reproducing the "vocal fremitus" -- vocalization-induced vibrations on the surface of the body -- as typically analyzed during physical examination of the thorax. Surface vibrations induced were detectable on all subjects, they reported.

"The spatial distribution of vibrational energy was found to be asymmetric to the benefit of the right size of the chest, and frequency dependent in the anteroposterior axis," said Couade. "As expected, the frequency distribution of vocalization does not overlap between men and women, with the latter being higher."

Ongoing clinical trials will use the AUSMC to focus on the identification of lung pathologies. But the researchers are hopeful that the technology, coupled with artificial intelligence algorithms, could usher in a new era of thorax examination in which vibration patterns can be isolated. This would offer a much better window on respiratory health and enable better diagnoses of respiratory diseases.

Source link

A new way to classify tuberculosis (TB) that aims to improve focus on the early stages of the disease has been presented by an international team involving researchers at UCL.

The new framework, published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, seeks to replace the approach of the last half century of defining TB as either active (i.e., causing illness and potentially infectious to others) or latent (being infected with the bacterium that causes TB [M tuberculosis] but feeling well and not infectious to others) – an approach researchers say is limiting progress in eradicating the disease.

Of note, large surveys conducted in over 20 countries recently have shown than many people with infectious TB feel well.

Under the new classification, there are four disease states: clinical (with symptoms) and subclinical (without symptoms), with each of these classed as either infectious or non-infectious. The fifth state is M. tuberculosis infection that has not progressed to disease – that is, M tuberculosis may be present in the body and alive, but there are no signs of the disease that are visible to the naked eye, for example with imaging.

The researchers say they hope the International Consensus for Early TB (ICE-TB) framework, developed by a diverse group of 64 experts, will help lead to better diagnosis and treatment of the early stages of TB which have historically been overlooked in research.

TB remains the world's most deadly infectious disease currently and has caused over one billion deaths in the last 200 years. An estimated three million cases a year are not reported to health systems and more than half of these cases will be asymptomatic.

The international team was led by researchers at UCL, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI), University of Cape Town, Imperial College London and the South African Medical Research Council.

The binary paradigm of active disease versus latent infection has resulted in a one-size-fits-all antibiotic treatment for disease, but designed for those with the most severe form of disease. This leads to potential over-treatment of individuals with subclinical TB.


A key research priority now is to identify the best combination, dosage and duration of antibiotics to treat each TB state, as well as the benefits of treating the subclinical states."


Dr Hanif Esmail, co-lead author at the UCL Institute for Global Health and MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL

Professor Rein Houben (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine), co-lead author of the paper, said: "While providing treatment to people who become very sick with TB has saved millions of lives we are not stopping transmission of the disease."

"To prevent transmission of TB, we need to move away from focusing just on the very sick and look at earlier disease states, identifying people who may be infectious for months or years before they develop TB symptoms. 

"Our consensus framework replaces the old binary concept of 'active' versus 'latent' TB with a more detailed classification system that we hope, if widely adopted, could help to improve treatment for those with early-stage TB and drive forward efforts to eradicate the disease."

The framework was developed via a Delphi process designed to reach a consensus among a diverse group. The process began with a scoping review of papers and online surveys of experts and culminated in a two-day meeting in Cape Town, South Africa, of researchers from a range of disciplines as well as policymakers, clinicians, and TB survivors.

Dr Anna Coussens, co-lead author from WEHI, said: "One key finding in the consensus is moving the disease threshold and acknowledging that disease does not just start with symptoms or transmission, but when tissue is damaged.

"In time we hope our framework can contribute to TB elimination by leading to improved early diagnosis and treatment, optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing transmission."

The researchers noted that the disease process was non-linear – that people may fluctuate between infectious and non-infectious states, and between the presence and absence of symptoms or signs.

They also said that better diagnostic tools were needed to identify many of the TB states. For instance, there is currently no test to detect a viable M tuberculosis infection (i.e., one where the bacteria are physiologically active), as opposed to a non-viable infection or recent infection that has cleared.

The international team involved stakeholders from 19 countries including International Union Against TB and Lung Disease, The StopTB partnership, World Health Organization, FIND, National TB Programmes, TB Proof, and researchers from a number of universities and medical research institutes.

The work was supported by Wellcome, the National Institutes of Health/RePORT RSA, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Medical Research Council, the European Research Council, and the National Health and Medical Research Council.

Source:

Journal reference:

Coussens, A. K., et al. (2024) Classification of early tuberculosis states to guide research for improved care and prevention: an international Delphi consensus exercise. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00028-6.

Source link

  • Committee Opinion No. 644. The Apgar score. Obstet. Gynecol. 126, e52–e55 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Apgar, V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr. Res. Anesth. Analg. 32, 260–267 (1953).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lo, S. C. Y., Bhatia, R. & Roberts, C. T. Introduction of a quality improvement bundle is associated with reduced exposure to mechanical ventilation in very preterm infants. Neonatology 118, 578–585 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network.Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 1970–1979 (2010).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fischer, H. S. & Bührer, C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 132, e1351–e1360 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schmolzer, G. M. et al. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj 347, f5980 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bahadue, F. L. & Soll, R. Early versus delayed selective surfactant treatment for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 11, Cd001456 (2012).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Simma, B. et al. Delivery room management of infants with very low birth weight in 3 European countries—the video Apgar study. J. Pediatrics 222, 106–111.e2 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carbine, D. N., Finer, N. N., Knodel, E. & Rich, W. Video recording as a means of evaluating neonatal resuscitation performance. Pediatrics 106, 654–658 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blank, D., Rich, W., Leone, T., Garey, D. & Finer, N. Pedi-cap color change precedes a significant increase in heart rate during neonatal resuscitation. Resuscitation 85, 1568–1572 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lane, B., Finer, N. & Rich, W. Duration of intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation. J. Pediatr. 145, 67–70 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hegyi, T. et al. The Apgar score and its components in the preterm infant. Pediatrics 101, 77–81 (1998).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Donnell, C. P. F., Kamlin, C. O. F., Davis, P. G., Carlin, J. B. & Morley, C. J. Interobserver variability of the 5-minute Apgar score. J. Pediatr. 149, 486–489 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leone, T. A. Using video to assess and improve patient safety during simulated and actual neonatal resuscitation. Semin. Perinatol. 43, 151179 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaertner, V. D., Flemmer, S. A., Lorenz, L., Davis, P. G. & Kamlin, C. O. F. Physical stimulation of newborn infants in the delivery room. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 103, F132–F136 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hodgson, K. A., Owen, L. S. & Manley, B. J. Nasal high-flow therapy during neonatal endotracheal intubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1627–1637 (2022).

  • ANZCOR. Tracheal Intubation and Ventilation of the Newborn (2021).

  • Safercare Victoria. Intubation, www.safercare.vic.gov.au/clinical-guidance/neonatal/intubation (2019).

  • ANZCOR, Newborn Life Support Flowchart (2016).

  • Akoglu, H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk. J. Emerg. Med 18, 91–93 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Blundell, P. D. M. & Chakraborty, M. Relationship between Apgar scores and morbidity and mortality outcomes in preterm infants: a single-centre cohort study. Neonatology 117, 742–749 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Killion, M. M. Correct use of the Apgar score. MCN Am. J. Matern Child Nurs. 41, 123 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Medlock, S., Ravelli, A. C. J., Tamminga, P., Mol, B. W. M. & Abu-Hanna, A. Prediction of mortality in very premature infants: a systematic review of prediction models. PLoS One 6, e23441 (2011).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Catlin, E. A. et al. The Apgar score revisited: influence of gestational age. J. Pediatr. 109, 865–868 (1986).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Goldenberg, R. L., Huddleston, J. F. & Nelson, K. G. Apgar scores and umbilical arterial ph in preterm newborn infants. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 149, 651–654 (1984).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Katheria, A. et al. Neonatal resuscitation with an intact cord: a randomized clinical trial. J. Pediatr. 178, 75–80.e3 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dekker, J. et al. Tactile stimulation to stimulate spontaneous breathing during stabilization of preterm infants at birth: a retrospective analysis. Front. Pediatr. 5, 61 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kc, A. et al. Impact of stimulation among non-crying neonates with intact cord versus clamped cord on birth outcomes: observation study. BMJ Paediatr. Open 5, e001207 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Katheria, A., Rich, W. & Finer, N. Electrocardiogram provides a continuous heart rate faster than oximetry during neonatal resuscitation. Pediatrics 130, e1177–e1181 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Badurdeen, S. et al. Physiologically based cord clamping for infants ≥32+0 weeks gestation: a randomised clinical trial and reference percentiles for heart rate and oxygen saturation for infants ≥35+0 weeks gestation. PLoS Med. 19, e1004029 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Money, N. et al. Who’s counting? Assessing the effects of a simulation-based training intervention on the accuracy of neonatal heart rate auscultation. J. Perinatol. 39, 634–639 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chitkara, R. et al. The accuracy of human senses in the detection of neonatal heart rate during standardized simulated resuscitation: implications for delivery of care, training and technology design. Resuscitation 84, 369–372 (2013).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boon, W. et al. Evaluation of heart rate assessment timing, communication, accuracy, and clinical decision-making during high fidelity simulation of neonatal resuscitation. Int J. Pediatr. 2014, 927430 (2014).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kamlin, C. O. F., O’Donnell, C. P. F., Everest, N. J., Davis, P. G. & Morley, C. J. Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room. Resuscitation 71, 319–321 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnson, P. A. & Schmölzer, G. M. Heart rate assessment during neonatal resuscitation. Healthcare 8, 43 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dawson, J. A. et al. Oxygen saturation and heart rate during delivery room resuscitation of infants <30 weeks’ gestation with air or 100% oxygen. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 94, 87–91 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Crowther, C. A. et al. Assessing the neuroprotective benefits for babies of antenatal magnesium sulphate: an individual participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 14, e1002398 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link

    AstraZeneca has announced it will initiate a phase 3 trial to investigate the effect of the triple-combination inhaled therapy budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate (BGF [Breztri Aerosphere]) on severe cardiopulmonary outcomes, including death, with individuals who have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and elevated cardiopulmonary risk, according to a press release from the company.1

    Image Credit: mi_viri - stock.adobe.com

    “The 2024 GOLD Report highlights the treatment effect of non-pharmacologic interventions and inhaled triple combination therapies on mortality. The Report calls for a more proactive therapeutic approach to improve outcomes in COPD. If positive, the THARROS trial will provide critical evidence about the potential of single inhaler, triple combination therapy to reduce severe cardiopulmonary events and further advance treatment goals in COPD, including for patients with no history of exacerbations, for whom no evidence currently exists,” Fernando Martinez MD, MS, chief of the division of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, said in the press release.1

    According to the CDC, the age-adjusted prevalence of COPD has remained unchanged from 2011 to 2022, with estimates higher for women across years. Further, the age-standardized COPD death rates in adults decreased from 1999 to 2021, with a smaller difference between men and women in 2021 compared with 2019, according to the data from the CDC.2

    The THARROS study will be the first prospective trial to investigate the potential of inhaled triple therapy to reduce cardiopulmonary events in COPD. The study will investigate death from respiratory and cardiac causes will be the severe cardiopulmonary outcome measures. The trial will be multi-centered and double blinded and include 5000 individuals with COPD who have cardiopulmonary risk. Patients will be aged 40 to 80 years old and will receive the triple combination therapy or dual bronchodilator therapy, glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate, according to the press release.1

    Furthermore, the company has announced that the first participants have also been dosed in the ATHLOS phase 3 clinical trial, investigating the triple therapy drug compared to inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonist, budesonide/formoterol fumarate (Symbicort; AstraZeneca), or the placebo on cardiopulmonary parameters, including hyperinflation and exercise endurance time, according to the press release. This study will include 180 individuals aged 40 to 80 years old.1

    Key Takeaways

    1. The THARROS trial investigates the effect of Breztri Aerosphere (triple-combination therapy) on severe cardiopulmonary outcomes (including death) in high-risk COPD patients.
    2. These trials address the need for a more proactive approach to COPD treatment, potentially reducing severe cardiopulmonary events.
    3. Breztri is already approved for COPD maintenance treatment in many countries.

    BGF is currently approved to treat COPD in 75 countries, including the United States. The drug is indicated for the maintenance treatment of individuals with COPD. The most common adverse reactions included upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, back pain, oral candidiasis, influenza, muscle spasms, urinary tract infection, cough, sinusitis, and diarrhea, according to the press release.1

    “Large outcomes trials have transformed the management of cardiovascular diseases by enhancing our understanding of the potentially broad impact of therapies targeting those diseases. Current evidence already supports a proactive treatment approach in COPD. Now THARROS is seeking to provide first-of-its-kind evidence to support a strategy of comprehensive cardiopulmonary risk reduction with a triple therapy,” David Berg, MD, MPH, associated physician in cardiovascular and critical care medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital at Harvard Medical School, said in the press release.1

    References
    1. AstraZeneca announces initiation of THARROS – a Phase III clinical trial investigating the potential of Breztri to improve cardiopulmonary outcomes in people with COPD. News release. AstraZeneca. March 13, 2024. Accessed March 19, 2024. www.astrazeneca-us.com/media/press-releases/2024/astrazeneca-announces-initiation-of-tharros-a-phase-iii-clinical-trial-investigating-the-potential-of-breztri-to-improve-cardiopulmonary-outcomes-in-people-with-copd.html
    2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: National Trends. Updated February 29, 2024. Accessed March 19, 2024. www.cdc.gov/copd/data-and-statistics/national-trends.html

    Source link

    Person coughing into their elbow while in bed.

    The field of audiomics combines artificial intelligence tools with human sounds, such as a coughs, to evaluate health.Credit: Getty

    A team led by Google scientists has developed a machine-learning tool that can detect and monitor health conditions by evaluating noises such as coughing and breathing. The artificial intelligence (AI) system1, trained on millions of audio clips of human sounds, might one day be used by physicians to diagnose diseases including COVID-19 and tuberculosis and to assess how well a person’s lungs are functioning.

    This is not the first time a research group has explored using sound as a biomarker for disease. The concept gained traction during the COVID-19 pandemic, when scientists discovered that it was possible to detect the respiratory disease through a person’s cough2.

    What’s new about the Google system — called Health Acoustic Representations (HeAR) — is the massive data set that it was trained on, and the fact that it can be fine-tuned to perform multiple tasks.

    The researchers, who reported the tool earlier this month in a preprint1 that has not yet been peer reviewed, say it’s too early to tell whether HeAR will become a commercial product. For now, the plan is to give interested researchers access to the model so that they can use it in their own investigations. “Our goal as part of Google Research is to spur innovation in this nascent field,” says Sujay Kakarmath, a product manager at Google in New York City who worked on the project.

    How to train your model

    Most AI tools being developed in this space are trained on audio recordings — for example, of coughs — that are paired with health information about the person who made the sounds. For example, the clips might be labelled to indicate that the person had bronchitis at the time of the recording. The tool comes to associate features of the sounds with the data label, in a training process called supervised learning.

    “In medicine, traditionally, we have been using a lot of supervised learning, which is great because you have a clinical validation,” says Yael Bensoussan, a laryngologist at the University of South Florida in Tampa. “The downside is that it really limits the data sets that you can use, because there is a lack of annotated data sets out there.”

    Instead, the Google researchers used self-supervised learning, which relies on unlabelled data. Through an automated process, they extracted more than 300 million short sound clips of coughing, breathing, throat clearing and other human sounds from publicly available YouTube videos.

    Each clip was converted into a visual representation of sound called a spectrogram. Then the researchers blocked segments of the spectrograms to help the model learn to predict the missing portions. This is similar to how the large language model that underlies chatbot ChatGPT was taught to predict the next word in a sentence after being trained on myriad examples of human text. Using this method, the researchers created what they call a foundation model, which they say can be adapted for many tasks.

    An efficient learner

    In the case of HeAR, the Google team adapted it to detect COVID-19, tuberculosis and characteristics such as whether a person smokes. Because the model was trained on such a broad range of human sounds, to fine-tune it, the researchers only had to feed it very limited data sets labelled with these diseases and characteristics.

    On a scale where 0.5 represents a model that performs no better than a random prediction and 1 represents a model that makes an accurate prediction each time, HeAR scored 0.645 and 0.710 for COVID-19 detection, depending on which data set it was tested on — a better performance than existing models trained on speech data or general audio. For tuberculosis, the score was 0.739.

    The fact that the original training data were so diverse — with varying sound quality and human sources — also means that the results are generalizable, Kakarmath says.

    Ali Imran, an engineer at the University of Oklahoma in Tulsa, says that the sheer volume of data used by Google lends significance to the research. “It gives us the confidence that this is a reliable tool,” he says.

    Imran leads the development of an app named AI4COVID-19, which has shown promise at distinguishing COVID-19 coughs from other types of cough3. His team plans to apply for approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) so that the app can eventually move to market; he is currently seeking funding to conduct the necessary clinical trials. So far, no FDA-approved tool provides diagnosis through sounds.

    The field of health acoustics, or ‘audiomics’, is promising, Bensoussan says. “Acoustic science has existed for decades. What’s different is that now, with AI and machine learning, we have the means to collect and analyse a lot of data at the same time.” She co-leads a research consortium focused on exploring voice as a biomarker to track health.

    “There’s an immense potential not only for diagnosis, but also for screening” and monitoring, she says. “We can’t repeat scans or biopsies every week. So that’s why voice becomes a really important biomarker for disease monitoring,” she adds. “It’s not invasive, and it’s low resource.”

    Source link

    How are companies such as Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, Sanofi, MedImmune, and others influencing the COPD market?

    LAS VEGAS, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, March 21, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- The total market size of COPD in the 7MM was USD 12 billion in 2022 and is projected to grow during the forecast period (2023–2032) due to an increase in the diagnosed prevalent population of COPD along with the expected launch of emerging therapies such as Itepekimab (Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), Ensifentrine (RPL554) (Verona Pharma PLC), Dupilumab (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi), Benralizumab (AstraZeneca), Mepolizumab (GlaxoSmithKline), Acumapimod (Mereo BioPharma), and others.

    DelveInsight’s Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease epidemiology-based market forecast report includes a comprehensive understanding of these market drivers and how they will impact the overall COPD market size from 2019 to 2032, segmented into 7MM [the United States, the EU-4 (Italy, Spain, France, and Germany), the United Kingdom, and Japan].

    Key Takeaways from the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Report

    As per the DelveInsight assessment, the diagnosed prevalent cases of COPD in the 7MM were approximately 33 million in 2022.

    The estimates suggest the higher diagnosed prevalence of COPD in the United States with 18 million diagnosed cases in 2022 among the other 7MM countries which is expected to increase during the forecast period (2023–2032).

    According to DelveInsight, the majority of cases of COPD are in females as compared to males, in the US. But in EU4 and the UK, and Japan the diagnosed cases of males represent the majority of the cases. Overall, in the 7MM, females are predominantly high in number.

    COPD companies including Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Itepekimab), Verona Pharma PLC (Ensifentrine), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi (Dupilumab), AstraZeneca (Benralizumab), GlaxoSmithKline (Mepolizumab), Mereo BioPharma (Acumapimod), and others are evaluating their lead candidates in different stages of clinical development. They aim to investigate their products for the treatment of COPD.

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Dynamics

    The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease market dynamics are shaped by a confluence of factors, including rising prevalence rates, technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and shifting patient demographics. As one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, COPD presents a significant burden on healthcare systems globally. This has spurred considerable research and development efforts by pharmaceutical companies to introduce innovative therapies that address the diverse needs of COPD patients.

    Market growth is further fueled by the increasing adoption of combination therapies, such as inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists, which offer improved symptom management and disease control. Additionally, the emergence of novel biological therapies targeting specific inflammatory pathways has opened new avenues for personalized treatment approaches. These developments, coupled with a growing emphasis on early diagnosis and preventive measures, are expected to drive the COPD market forward, creating opportunities for market players to innovate and expand their offerings.

    However, challenges persist in the COPD market, including stringent regulatory requirements, pricing pressures, and the need for robust clinical evidence to support the efficacy of new interventions. Moreover, disparities in healthcare access and awareness remain significant hurdles, particularly in developing regions. Addressing these challenges will be crucial for stakeholders in the COPD market to ensure equitable access to effective treatments while fostering sustainable growth in this dynamic and evolving landscape.

    Download the report to understand which factors are driving COPD market trends @ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Insights
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Market

    Numerous individuals with COPD experience mild forms of the condition that typically necessitate minimal intervention apart from quitting smoking. Even for those in more advanced stages, there are effective therapies available aimed at managing symptoms, slowing disease progression, decreasing the risk of complications and flare-ups, and enhancing the ability to engage in daily activities. The objective of COPD treatment is to improve breathing and restore regular functioning, with numerous treatments and lifestyle adjustments being beneficial. Patients might also consider exploring various natural and alternative treatment options. COPD treatment is centered on alleviating symptoms like coughing, and breathing difficulties, and preventing respiratory infections, often tailored to the specific stage of the disease. Certain lifestyle modifications are essential for COPD prevention, with quitting smoking being the cornerstone of any COPD treatment plan. Ceasing smoking can halt the worsening of COPD and improve respiratory capacity.

    In April 2021, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. received approval from the European Commission to market beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate dihydrate, and glycopyrronium inhalation powder via the NEXThaler device. This is an ultra-fine blend of three medications combined into a single dry powder inhaler (DPI). The approval is for the ongoing treatment of adults with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who do not have sufficient response to a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta2-agonist, or a combination of a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA).

    Recent Developments in the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market

    In February 2024, the FDA accepted to assessment of the application from Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, seeking to expand the label of Dupixent (dupilumab) to incorporate its use as an additional treatment for specific adults experiencing unmanageable COPD.

    Emerging Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapies and Key Companies

    Some of the drugs in the COPD pipeline include Itepekimab (Sanofi/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), Ensifentrine (RPL554) (Verona Pharma PLC), Dupilumab (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi), Benralizumab (AstraZeneca), Mepolizumab (GlaxoSmithKline), Acumapimod (Mereo BioPharma), and others.
    Itepekimab (SAR440340/REGN3500/Anti-IL-33 mAb) is a completely human monoclonal antibody designed to hinder interleukin-33 (IL-33), a protein thought to be central in both type 1 and type 2 inflammation. Administered through subcutaneous injection, preclinical investigations indicated that REGN3500 effectively blocked various indicators of these inflammatory responses. Regeneron and Sanofi are presently exploring REGN3500's potential in respiratory and dermatological conditions where inflammation is a significant factor. The drug is currently undergoing Phase III trials for COPD. Developed using Regeneron's specialized VelocImmune technology, which produces optimized fully human antibodies, REGN3500 is a collaborative effort between Regeneron and Sanofi as part of their global partnership.

    Ensifentrine (RPL554) is a novel inhaled medication developed by Verona Pharma plc that acts as a dual inhibitor of both the phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) and phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) enzymes. This unique characteristic allows it to offer both bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects within a single compound, setting it apart from the current drug classes used to manage COPD, such as corticosteroids, beta2-agonists, and antimuscarinics. Verona Pharma plc has reported positive tolerability of ensifentrine in clinical trials involving approximately 3,000 participants.
    The company is currently conducting a Phase III clinical program to assess the efficacy of nebulized ensifentrine for the maintenance treatment of COPD. Additionally, two other formulations of ensifentrine—dry powder inhaler (DPI) and pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI)—are in Phase II development for COPD treatment.

    In the third quarter of 2023, the FDA accepted Verona Pharma plc's New Drug Application for nebulized ensifentrine for COPD maintenance treatment. The FDA has set a target action date of June 26, 2024, for this application.

    The other therapies in the COPD pipeline include

    Astegolimab (MSTT1041A, AMG 282, RG6149): Genentech, Inc.
    SB240563 (Mepolizumab)/NUCALA: GlaxoSmithKline
    Dupilumab/SAR231893 (Dupixent): Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi
    Tozorakimab (MEDI3506): AstraZeneca/MedImmune LLC
    FASENRA (Benralizumab): AstraZeneca
    Tezspire (Tezepelumab): AstraZeneca
    EP395: EpiEndo Pharmaceuticals
    SelK2: Tetherex Pharmaceuticals
    Mitiperstat (AZD4831): AstraZeneca
    CHF6001/Tanimilast: Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.
    SNG001 (IFN-β): Synairgen Research Ltd.
    Acumapimod (BCT-197): Mereo Biopharma
    Zofin: Organicell Regenerative Medicine
    PUL-042: Pulmotect, Inc.
    MV130: Inmunotek S.L.
    GSK3923868: GlaxoSmithKline
    PUR1800: PULMATRiX
    GRC 39815: GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
    DMX-700: Dimerix Limited

    The anticipated launch of these emerging therapies for COPD are poised to transform the market landscape in the coming years. As these cutting-edge therapies continue to mature and gain regulatory approval, they are expected to reshape the COPD market landscape, offering new standards of care and unlocking opportunities for medical innovation and economic growth.

    Discover more about drugs for COPD in development @ Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Clinical Trials

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Overview

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a prevalent, avoidable, and manageable condition distinguished by enduring respiratory issues and restricted airflow due to abnormalities in the airways or air sacs, typically stemming from significant exposure to harmful particles or gases. While primary among the cause is smoking tobacco, additional environmental factors such as exposure to biomass fuels and air contaminants could also play a role. Apart from these exposures, certain inherent factors make individuals more susceptible to COPD. These encompass genetic anomalies, irregular lung growth, and an accelerated aging process. The most prominent symptom of COPD is persistent and worsening difficulty in breathing. A cough accompanied by the production of phlegm occurs in around 30% of patients. These indications can fluctuate from day to day and might manifest many years before the onset of restricted airflow.

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Epidemiology Segmentation

    The COPD epidemiology section provides insights into the historical and current COPD patient pool and forecasted trends for individual seven major countries. It helps to recognize the causes of current and forecasted trends by exploring numerous studies and views of key opinion leaders.

    The COPD market report proffers epidemiological analysis for the study period 2019–2032 in the 7MM segmented into:

    Total COPD Diagnosed Prevalent Cases
    COPD Gender-specific Diagnosed Prevalent Cases
    COPD Age-specific Diagnosed Prevalent Cases
    Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of COPD Based on Severity of Airflow
    Diagnosed Prevalent Cases of COPD Based on Symptoms and Exacerbation History COPD

    Scope of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Report

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapeutic Assessment: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease current marketed and emerging therapies
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Key Companies: Genentech, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Verona Pharma plc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, MedImmune LLC, EpiEndo Pharmaceuticals, Tetherex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Synairgen Research Ltd., Mereo Biopharma, Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Pulmotect, Inc., Inmunotek S.L., PULMATRiX, GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, Dimerix Limited, ProterixBio, and others
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pipeline Therapies: Astegolimab (MSTT1041A, AMG 282, RG6149), SB240563 (Mepolizumab)/NUCALA, Ensifentrine (RPL554), Itepekimab/SAR440340/REGN3500, Dupilumab/SAR231893 (Dupixent), Tozorakimab (MEDI3506), FASENRA (Benralizumab), Tezspire (Tezepelumab), EP395, SelK2, Mitiperstat (AZD4831), CHF6001/Tanimilast, SNG001 (IFN-β), Acumapimod (BCT-197), Zofin, PUL-042, MV130, GSK3923868, PUR1800, GRC 39815, DMX-700, and others
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Dynamics: Attribute Analysis of Emerging Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Drugs
    Competitive Intelligence Analysis: SWOT analysis and Market entry strategies
    Unmet Needs, KOL’s views, Analyst’s views, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Access and Reimbursement

    Table of Contents

    1.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Key Insights
    2.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Report Introduction
    3.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Overview at a Glance
    4.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Executive Summary
    5.
    Disease Background and Overview
    6.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment and Management
    7.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Epidemiology and Patient Population
    8.
    Patient Journey
    9.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Marketed Drugs
    10.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Emerging Drugs
    11.
    Seven Major Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Analysis
    12.
    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Market Outlook
    13.
    Potential of Current and Emerging Therapies
    14.
    KOL Views
    15.
    Unmet Needs
    16.
    SWOT Analysis
    17.
    Appendix
    18.
    DelveInsight Capabilities
    19.
    Disclaimer
    20.
    About DelveInsight

    Related Reports

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pipeline Report

    Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pipeline Insight – 2024 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key COPD companies, including Sanofi, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., United Therapeutics Corporation, Verona Pharma plc, Immunotek, Yungjin Pharm. Co., Ltd., Pulmotect, Inc., Tetherex Pharmaceutical, CSL Behring, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Genentech, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, EmeraMed, Afimmune, Mereo BioPharma, Synairgen, Adamis Pharmaceuticals, Quercegen Pharmaceuticals LLC, Regend Therapeutics, Meridigen Biotech Co., Ltd., Pulmatrix, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, EpiEndo Pharmaceuticals, 3SBio, OmniSpirant, Foresee Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, ProterixBio, RS BioTherapeutics, MitoRx, C4X Discovery, Respiratorius, ARK biosciences, Incannex, GNI Pharma, Celon pharma, Alveolus Bio, Kinaset therapeutics, Landos Biopharma, Parion Sciences, KeyMed Biosciences, Bioneer corporation, AlgiPharma, Palobiofarma, Dimerix Bioscience, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, among others.

    About DelveInsight

    DelveInsight is a leading Business Consultant, and Market Research firm focused exclusively on life sciences. It supports pharma companies by providing comprehensive end-to-end solutions to improve their performance. Get hassle-free access to all the healthcare and pharma market research reports through our subscription-based platform PharmDelve.

    DelveInsight’s healthcare consulting services leverage our extensive industry expertise, market research capabilities, and data analytics to provide clients with practical, data-driven solutions. The consultants work closely with clients to understand their unique needs and challenges and to develop tailored solutions that meet their specific requirements. DelveInsight’s consulting services cover a range of areas, including market access, commercial strategy, product development, and regulatory affairs in the healthcare domain.

    Shruti Thakur
    DelveInsight Business Research LLP
    +1 469-945-7679
    www.delveinsight.com

    Source link

    For the thousands of people globally affected by the disease myasthenia gravis (MG), everyday activities become a struggle, and in severe cases, the disease can be life-threatening.

    Until now, there has been no muscle-specific and effective treatment against this rare autoimmune disease that leads to severe weakening of the muscles and fatigue. But now, a team of researchers from Aarhus University reveals a breakthrough in the treatment of MG that could give hope to many patients worldwide.

    "The patients simply became stronger because the new treatment improves the communication between motor nerves and muscle fibers," says Thomas Holm Pedersen, an associate professor at the Department of Biomedicine at Aarhus University, CEO of NMD Pharma, and the lead author of the study that has just been published in the journal Science Translational Medicine.

    Focusing on the link between nerve cells and muscles

    MG is a disease where the immune system attacks the connection between nerves and muscle cells. It can affect breathing and be life-threatening, and it was precisely these symptoms that the researchers aimed to combat by strengthening the function of the contact point between nerves and muscle cells.

    During his PhD project at Aarhus University, Thomas Holm Pedersen discovered that the so-called CIC-1 chloride channels at the neuromuscular junction are crucial for muscle activation.

    "This led to the idea of using the CI channels as a new treatment point for diseases where the neuromuscular connection is compromised, including myasthenia gravis," he explains.

    And it proved to be a good idea. The researchers demonstrated that they could effectively strengthen the muscles' ability to respond to nerve impulses by targeting a treatment at the specific channel. This, in theory, could increase muscle strength and reduce fatigue in patients.

    "As there were no medications targeting the Cl channel, we first had to find the right molecule that we could test in patients, which requires considerable work and various tests before the regulatory authorities allow testing in humans. We tested it on patients who had to take a tablet daily for their muscle weakness and fatigue, and we could see that the treatment concept worked. The patients became stronger.

    Treatment without side effects?

    This represents a significant advance in the treatment of MG. Not only because it was successful in increasing muscle strength among patients, but also because the treatment, unlike existing methods, may well prove to be free from side effects.

    "We won't know for sure for a few years, after we've conducted more studies, but it looks really promising right now," says Thomas Holm Pedersen.

    The breakthrough could result in a significant improvement in the quality of life for patients struggling with MG, but it is also a big leap forward in the understanding and treatment of other neuromuscular diseases.

    The research team is currently planning more follow-up clinical trials, including another study on MG and one on the hereditary disease spinal muscular atrophy, which leads to muscle wasting.

    According to Thomas Holm Pedersen, we may be on the verge of a paradigm shift in the treatment of MG and other serious neuromuscular diseases.

    "This study summarizes years of work here at Aarhus University and NMD Pharma. We have proven that the method works in patients, and now we continue with the clinical trials to bring the drug to the patients and to explore its broader application," he says.


    Behind the research result

    Study type: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover comparison of two single oral doses of NMD670 and placebo in men and women with stable symptomatic MG

    Partners: NMD Pharma

    External funding: The study is financed by NMD Pharma

    Conflict of interest: Thomas Holm Pedersen and several others are inventors on patents related to the treatment of neuromuscular disorders, which involve both specific compounds and manufacturing processes. The research is supported by NMD Pharma A/S, where many of the authors are or have been employed, and some have financial interests in the form of stock options. A few authors have received funding or have consultancy roles with NMD Pharma A/S.

    Link to the scientific article: www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scitranslmed.adk9109?adobe_mc=MCMID%3D61181809243887096264036353964800578399%7CMCORGID%3D242B6472541199F70A4C98A6%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1710786479

    About NMD Pharma

    NMD Pharma was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Aarhus. The company develops new treatments for neuromuscular diseases.

    Founded by:

    Investors:

    • Novo Holdings – a private equity fund owned by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.
    • Lundbeckfonden BioCapital – a capital fund owned by the Lundbeck Foundation. Invests in life science companies focusing on neuroscience.
    • INKEF Capital – a capital fund investing in life science companies in the USA and Europe.
    • The Roche Venture Fund – a capital fund owned by Roche. Invests in life science companies focusing on new technologies.
    • Jeito Capital – a capital fund investing in life science companies in Europe.
    • CAPNOVA – a capital fund investing in life science companies in Denmark.

    NMD Pharma was established by researchers from the Department of Biomedicine at Aarhus University, where they have worked on developing new treatments for neuromuscular diseases.

    NMD Pharma has a collaboration agreement with the university, which among other things gives NMD Pharma access to the university's laboratory facilities.

    NMD Pharma also has a number of employees who are affiliated with Aarhus University. These employees work on both research and development projects.

    /Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

    Source link

    The thorax, the part of the body between the neck and abdomen, provides medical professionals with a valuable window into a patient's respiratory health. By evaluating sound vibrations produced by the airflow induced within the lungs and bronchial tree during normal breathing as well as those produced by the larynx during vocalizations, doctors can identify potential disease-related abnormalities within the respiratory system.

    But, among other shortcomings, common respiratory assessments can be subjective and are only as good as the quality of the exam. While the advent of multipoint electronic stethoscopes has helped in terms of identifying abnormalities during normal breathing, there remains a dearth of technological devices that can help characterize surface vibrations produced by vocalizations.

    In AIP Advances, by AIP Publishing, a team of French researchers demonstrated the efficacy of ultrasound technology to detect low-amplitude movements produced by vocalizations at the surface of the chest. They also demonstrated the possibility of using the "airborne ultrasound surface motion camera" (AUSMC) to map these vibrations during short durations so as to illustrate their evolution.

    AUSMC is a new imaging technology that allows the observation of the human thorax surface vibrations due to respiratory and cardiac activities at high frame rates of typically 1,000 images per second. The technology shares the physical principle of conventional ultrasound Doppler imaging, but it does not require a probe to be applied on the skin."


    Mathieu Couade, Author

    The researchers tested the AUSMC on 77 healthy volunteers to image the surface vibrations caused by natural vocalizations with the aim of reproducing the "vocal fremitus" – vocalization-induced vibrations on the surface of the body – as typically analyzed during physical examination of the thorax. Surface vibrations induced were detectable on all subjects, they reported.

    "The spatial distribution of vibrational energy was found to be asymmetric to the benefit of the right size of the chest, and frequency dependent in the anteroposterior axis," said Couade. "As expected, the frequency distribution of vocalization does not overlap between men and women, with the latter being higher."

    Ongoing clinical trials will use the AUSMC to focus on the identification of lung pathologies. But the researchers are hopeful that the technology, coupled with artificial intelligence algorithms, could usher in a new era of thorax examination in which vibration patterns can be isolated. This would offer a much better window on respiratory health and enable better diagnoses of respiratory diseases.

    Source:

    Journal reference:

    Wintzenrieth, F., et al. (2024) Airborne ultrasound for the contactless mapping of surface thoracic vibrations during human vocalizations: A pilot study. AIP Advances. doi.org/10.1063/5.0187945.

    Source link

    WASHINGTON, March 19, 2024 – The thorax, the part of the body between the neck and abdomen, provides medical professionals with a valuable window into a patient's respiratory health. By evaluating sound vibrations produced by the airflow induced within the lungs and bronchial tree during normal breathing as well as those produced by the larynx during vocalizations, doctors can identify potential disease-related abnormalities within the respiratory system.

    But, among other shortcomings, common respiratory assessments can be subjective and are only as good as the quality of the exam. While the advent of multipoint electronic stethoscopes has helped in terms of identifying abnormalities during normal breathing, there remains a dearth of technological devices that can help characterize surface vibrations produced by vocalizations.

    In AIP Advances, by AIP Publishing, a team of French researchers demonstrated the efficacy of ultrasound technology to detect low-amplitude movements produced by vocalizations at the surface of the chest. They also demonstrated the possibility of using the "airborne ultrasound surface motion camera" (AUSMC) to map these vibrations during short durations so as to illustrate their evolution.

    "AUSMC is a new imaging technology that allows the observation of the human thorax surface vibrations due to respiratory and cardiac activities at high frame rates of typically 1,000 images per second," said author Mathieu Couade. "The technology shares the physical principle of conventional ultrasound Doppler imaging, but it does not require a probe to be applied on the skin."

    The researchers tested the AUSMC on 77 healthy volunteers to image the surface vibrations caused by natural vocalizations with the aim of reproducing the "vocal fremitus" – vocalization-induced vibrations on the surface of the body – as typically analyzed during physical examination of the thorax. Surface vibrations induced were detectable on all subjects, they reported.

    "The spatial distribution of vibrational energy was found to be asymmetric to the benefit of the right size of the chest, and frequency dependent in the anteroposterior axis," said Couade. "As expected, the frequency distribution of vocalization does not overlap between men and women, with the latter being higher."

    Ongoing clinical trials will use the AUSMC to focus on the identification of lung pathologies. But the researchers are hopeful that the technology, coupled with artificial intelligence algorithms, could usher in a new era of thorax examination in which vibration patterns can be isolated. This would offer a much better window on respiratory health and enable better diagnoses of respiratory diseases.

    /Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.

    Source link

    ksi logo

    The idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 11.87% from US$3.459 billion in 2022 to US$7.585 billion by 2029.

    The idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 11.87% from US$3.459 billion in 2022 to US$7.585 billion by 2029.”

    — Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence

    NOIDA, UTTAR PARDESH, INDIA, March 19, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- According to a new study published by Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence, the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 11.87% between 2022 and 2029 to reach US$7.585 billion by 2029.

    Older persons are mostly affected by Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), a progressive lung disease for which there is no known cause. Breathing becomes more difficult as a result of the lung tissue being thicker and more rigid. Breathlessness, a chronic dry cough, exhaustion, and finally respiratory collapse are some of the symptoms. Although environmental variables and genetic predisposition may play a role, the precise explanation is yet unknown. Lung function examinations and imaging tests are necessary for the diagnosis, which frequently entails ruling out other illnesses. Treatment options include medication, oxygen therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation, and, in extreme circumstances, the possibility of a lung transplant, all of which are intended to manage symptoms and delay the progression of the disease.

    The long-term, progressive lung illness known as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by lung tissue scarring, which results in decreased oxygen supply and rigidity. It is yet unknown what causes it, which is why it is called "idiopathic." Breathlessness, a chronic cough, and exhaustion are among the symptoms, which usually get worse with time. With a median survival of 2–5 years after diagnosis, IPF primarily affects elderly persons and has a bad prognosis. Treatment includes pulmonary rehabilitation, lung transplant in severe cases, and drugs such as nintedanib and pirfenidone to control symptoms and halt the progression of the disease. To improve patient outcomes, research keeps looking into novel treatments and deepens our understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving the disease.

    The market is witnessing multiple collaborations and technological advancements, for instance In January 2023 The US FDA gave Lotus Pharmaceutical's Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for Nintedanib Capsules, a generic form of Boehringer Ingelheim's OFEV®, preliminary clearance. The generic Nintedanib Capsules will be introduced by the company as soon as possible.

    Access sample report or view details: www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/global-idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis-treatment-market

    The idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) market is expected to have significant growth in the drug class sector. Pharmaceutical companies are constantly developing new medications that target inflammation and fibrotic pathways as a result of continuous research and development activities. This expands the therapy options available to patients. Advances in early diagnosis and personalized therapy also play a part in the growing use of pharmaceutical interventions. The Drug class sector exhibits substantial potential for expansion, driven by innovation and the ongoing pursuit of effective medicines to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life in the management of IPF, despite obstacles such as high treatment costs and restricted therapeutic alternatives.

    Based on drug type, the market for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is expected to rise, with pirfenidone and nintedanib being key players. Because of its effectiveness and tolerability, pirfenidone—which has anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory qualities—has become a mainstay treatment. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor nintedanib, on the other hand, provides a unique mechanism that targets the advancement of fibrosis. Although both medications have shown effectiveness in delaying the course of sickness, nitedanib's distinct mechanism might contribute to the growth of its market. Nonetheless, pirfenidone's lengthier clinical history and established commercial presence might help it maintain its relevance. Ultimately, each segment's growth trajectory will be determined by patient preferences, developing clinical evidence, and market factors.

    Based on end-users, Due to several factors, the hospital segment in the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) market is expected to increase significantly. Hospitals provide specialized care through interdisciplinary teams and are major centers for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of complicated respiratory disorders like IPF. As treatment options and diagnostic technology progress, hospitals become the main hubs for complete IPF care. The need for IPF-related services is further fueled by the increased need for hospital admissions and treatments brought on by the growing prevalence of IPF. Furthermore, hospitals frequently have access to clinical trials and cutting-edge therapies, which draws individuals looking for the best care possible for their ailments.

    Based on geography the idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) market in the Asia-Pacific region is expanding significantly due to factors such as escalating healthcare costs, aging populations, and more awareness. Access to cutting-edge therapies and enhanced diagnostic methods both support the growth. Governmental programs to combat respiratory illnesses and improve healthcare facilities also contribute to the market's expansion. Pharmaceutical businesses and academic institutions working together to promote research and development can result in new remedies that are tailored to the unique needs of the area. Notwithstanding obstacles such as inadequate knowledge and problems with reimbursement, the Asia-Pacific IPF market exhibits encouraging growth prospects.

    As a part of the report, the major players operating in the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), market that have been covered are Boehringer Ingelheim GMBH, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Biogen, Cipla, Hoffman-La Roche AG, Fibrogen Inc, Galapagos NV, Medicinova Inc., Novartis AG, Prometic Life sciences Inc.

    The market analytics report segments the Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), market on the following basis:

    • BY TREATMENT TYPE

    o Drug class

    o Oxygen Therapy

    o Lung Transplant

    o Others

    • BY DRUG TYPE

    o Pirfenidone

    o Nintedanib

    • BY END-USER

    o Hospital

    o Clinic

    • BY GEOGRAPHY

    o North America

    • USA

    • Canada

    • Mexico

    o South America

    • Brazil

    • Argentina

    • Others

    o Europe

    • Germany

    • France

    • UK

    • Others

    o Middle East and Africa

    • Saudi Arabia

    • UAE

    • Others

    o Asia Pacific

    • China

    • India

    • Japan

    • South Korea

    • Taiwan

    • Thailand

    • Indonesia

    • Others

    Companies Profiled:

    • Boehringer Ingelheim GMBH

    • Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

    • Biogen

    • Cipla

    • Hoffman-La Roche AG

    • Fibrogen, Inc.

    • Galapagos NV

    • Medicinova, Inc.

    • Novartis AG

    • Prometic Life sciences Inc.

    Explore More Reports:

    • Cystic Fibrosis Market: www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/cystic-fibrosis-market

    • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Diagnostic And Treatment Market: www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis-diagnostic-and-treatment-market

    • Melanoma Treatment Market: www.knowledge-sourcing.com/report/melanoma-treatment-market

    Ankit Mishra
    Knowledge Sourcing Intelligence LLP
    +1 850-250-1698
    email us here
    Visit us on social media:
    Facebook
    Twitter
    LinkedIn



    Source link

    사진설명

    "Don't Die"." This is a phrase that U.S. venture businessman Brian Johnson (born in 1977) likes to use after selling his fintech company for $800 million (about 1 trillion won) and dreaming of "transcendence of death" as his next goal.
    Since 2021, Johnson has been spending $2 million (about 2.6 billion won) a year to conduct a "老 project" on himself as an experimenter. He analyzed more than 1,000 papers and publications, saying he would return his mid-40s to around the age of 18, and has set up more than 30 medical staff to participate in the project.
    Johnson eats beans before 11 a.m., and takes more than 100 pills a day. I go to bed at 8:30 p.m. and wake up at 5 a.m. In addition, they continue to examine internal organs, blood vessels, and muscle strength, and they do not neglect their efforts to keep their skin clean with infrared rays or lasers. Sunggi, a male symbol, also seeks rejuvenation with shock wave treatment. He stopped bad habits such as overeating, eating low-quality food, lack of sleep, and excessive drinking. Johnson achieved about five years of epigenetic age reversal in just two years. More than 100 items were identified as "reverse biomarkers," and aging was delayed by about 30%. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) determination revealed that the muscle and fat composition was similar to that of the 18-year-old.
    Will humanity be able to slow down biological aging like Johnson and realize a long, healthy life in the age of 100?
    Human life span more than doubled in 100 years around the age of 30 in the 19th century due to medical advances and improvements in the sanitary environment. The desire to live a healthy life is leading to efforts to challenge the limits of "life expectancy 120 years" with genetic engineering that emerged in the 20th century. The Nihon Keizai Shimbun quoted Kenji Hayano, Japan's Keioji University, famous for his aging research, as saying, "Human life expectancy can be aimed at over 250 years old. You can also achieve your dream of moving to a distant star country, which takes a long time," he said. Dr. Hayano said that when mice around the age of 70 were injected with anti-aging drug candidates, their muscles became younger and moved actively like they were in their 40s. He will also start clinical trials in 2026 for patients with sarcopenia or dementia, whose muscle strength declines with age. Clinical trials using genome editing technology will also be conducted in 2027.

    사진설명

    Human aging and diseases are related to cells, and the energy source of cells is 'mitochondria'. We move our bodies, think with our heads, breathe, move our hearts, digest and absorb food.
    As such, all life activities require energy. The source of energy is a substance called adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is produced in mitochondria. Our body is made up of tens of trillions of cells, with as many as thousands of mitochondria in one cell. For example, there are 1000 to 3000 mitochondria per liver cell and 100 to 200 plant cells.
    ATP is constantly made using oxygen, which enters the body with breathing, as the main ingredient for sugar or lipids in the food ingested. However, when mitochondrial numbers decrease and function decreases due to aging or bad lifestyle, ATP becomes difficult to make. This leads to a lack of energy, which weakens several organs and degrades their function. In addition, the oxygen used to produce ATP is easily converted into active oxygen that damages cells. It is the main cause of aging or disease. In other words, mitochondria must be healthy to maintain their youth and health.
    So how can mitochondria get healthy and get out of the disease with ageing prevention?
    Experts cite △ restrictions on calories consumed (calorie) △ activation of ketone bodies by reducing sugar △ lactic acid exercise △ high-pressure oxygen therapy.
    Various studies have shown that 食 activates hormones and genes as well as mitochondria. If you reduce your caloric intake through news and fasting, you will be angry that mitochondria, which are usually tingling due to overeating, cannot be used. Professor Hiroshi Ito of Keio Kizuku University's Preventive Medical Center explained, "When you are hungry, a hormone called ghrelin is secreted from your stomach. This activates mitochondria." In particular, fasting stimulates sirtuin, which is known as an anti-aging and longevity gene. When the sirtuins begin to move, the mitochondria also regain their vitality.
    Dr. Kazuo Tsubota (author of "Train Your Longevity Gene" in Japan) said, "If you enjoy the right lifestyle, that is, eating news and vegetarianism (菜食), the remaining 95% of cells that are asleep are activated and the number of mitochondria increases, leading to a long life." The sirtuin gene was first discovered in yeast by U.S. MIT professor Leonard Garrenti in 2000, but it has also been confirmed to be present in nematodes, fruit flies, some mammals, and humans.
    Several studies have shown that news is good for you. Dr. Clive Mackay, a nutritionist at Cornell University in the United States, conducted an experiment to limit caloric intake to 65% of normal in mice, and the average lifespan of mice nearly doubled. A research team at the University of Wisconsin also tested rhesus monkeys for 20 years and found that the monkey group that ate a diet that reduced calories by 30% looked glossy, less white hair or wrinkles, and much younger than the monkey group that ate as they wanted.
    Ketone bodies are attracting attention as substances that activate mitochondria. Ketone bodies are intermediate metabolites that occur when body fat is synthesized or broken down. When the action of insulin, a hormone that lowers blood sugar, weakens, ketone body synthesis begins. And it becomes an energy source and is transported to the mitochondria.
    The ketone body that comes into direct contact is very efficient. "Keton bodies are easier to reach the brain than other compounds and are particularly effective in brain neurons called neurons (a unit of the nervous system responsible for stimulation and excitement)," said Takumi Sato, a professor of applied biology at the University of Tokyo. "The activation of mitochondria in neurons leads to dementia prevention."

    사진설명

    Reducing sugar intake is necessary to produce ketone bodies. Eating less rice, increasing side dishes, or quitting snacks helps increase ketone body concentration. Professor Sato said, "It is also good to change your breakfast to coffee with saltless butter. However, excessive sugar restriction is not desirable. "Saccharide is essential as a material for ATP that activates mitochondria," he said, stressing that "the appropriate combination of sugar and ketone bodies is important."
    Carbohydrates contain 糖質 (glucide) most frequently. Carbohydrates are made up of 'sugar + dietary fiber', and most of them are sugar. Ramen has 78g of carbohydrate and 0g of dietary fiber, so it has 78g of sugar. We pay attention to sugar because carbohydrates are the main culprits of sugar poisoning. Most of the sugars that cause obesity are unsweetened carbohydrates such as rice, bread, and noodles.
    "Saccharide addiction is a serious chronic disease that leads to obesity, the root of all diseases," said Genji Makita, director of AGE Makita Hospital (author of "Saccharide Addiction"), a Japanese diabetes expert. "Heart disease is not the only disease that causes obesity." Diabetes, high blood pressure, chronic kidney disease, stroke, cancer, and Alzheimer's disease are all related to obesity.
    Mitochondria are also activated by exercise. Aerobic exercises such as walking and jogging speed up your breathing and increase your heart rate. In other words, when oxygen is scarce, the body feels a sense of crisis and boosts mitochondria. When blood flow improves due to exercise, sodium diuretic peptides are secreted from the heart and nitrogen monoxide (N О) from blood vessels, said Hiroshi Ito, a professor at Keio Kizuku University. Like ghrelin, they activate mitochondria," he explained.
    Exercise strengthens muscles, boosts immunity, and improves blood flow. When blood flow improves, blood circulation is promoted, oxygen and nutrients are transported well to every corner of our body, and carbon dioxide and waste are discharged well. In addition, when exercising, more than 30 kinds of substances such as "myokine" and "cytokine" are made, which act on cells or tissues throughout the body, such as fat, nerve cells, and blood vessels. These substances begin to be secreted from the muscles after an hour of aerobic exercise such as cycling and 10 minutes of intense muscle training. Typical aerobic exercises include hiking, jogging, biking, swimming, tennis, badminton, and fast walking. Aerobic exercise that focuses on burning body fat is most appropriate three to four times a week, within an hour at a time.
    Recently, "Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)" has attracted attention as a way to activate mitochondria. According to a study published in September 2022 by Yonsei University's Wonju Industry Cooperation Group, hyperbaric oxygen activates mitochondria, suppressing the generation of free oxygen and reducing blood sugar and fatty liver. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy causes 100% oxygen to be inhaled in an enclosed space (chamber) that applies pressure of 2 atmospheres or higher, increasing the oxygen concentration in plasma by more than 10 times that of normal, thereby healing the damaged area. In addition to various diseases such as cancer, stroke, brain injury, foot disease, postoperative wounds, and sudden hearing loss, hyperbaric oxygen therapy devices have recently been actively used in skin and plastic surgery. It is true anti-aging that increases the natural healing power of cells rather than artificial skin care such as Botox and skincare. Yoon Seok-ho, CEO of Ibex, explained, "It is effective in helping treatment and preventing necrosis by supplying high concentration oxygen into the tissue to activate cells in wounds or tissues that do not recover easily."
    Mitochondria are the source of life. However, reactive oxygen is generated as a by-product during cellular respiration, causing various diseases such as cancer along with aging. Humans breathe and use oxygen to create energy, and they cannot be free from free oxygen during their lives. Therefore, each individual has no choice but to produce a lot of high-quality mitochondria in order to live a long and healthy life in the 100-year-old era.
    [Lee Byung Moon, a medical reporter]

    Source link

    Introduction

    Asthma in the pediatric population is present in about one in every 10 children and adolescents around the world, presenting heterogeneous characteristics composed of different clinical phenotypes and endotypes.1,2 The underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms (endotypes) of asthma have been represented by Th2 and non-Th2 inflammatory patterns. The Th2 inflammatory pattern, which responds well to the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), accounts for approximately 50 to 60% of asthma in the pediatric population. In this spectrum of inflammation, allergic eosinophilic asthma is the most prevalent in children and adolescents, in which environmental allergens become real villains.3

    On the other hand, the non-Th2 inflammatory pattern represents a significant and growing number of patients who do not respond well to the use of IC and are classified as having neutrophilic or paucigranulocytic asthma (Figure 1). In non-Th2 inflammation, the allergic components are not present in the patient and the immune responses are triggered mainly by the stimulus of pollutants and inhaled irritants, with an important participation of type 1 helper T cells (Th1) and 17 (Th17), in addition to pro-inflammatory interleukins such as IL-17, IL-25, IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP).4

    Figure 1 Participation of pollutants and inhaled irritants in inflammation of the respiratory epithelium in different asthma endotypes.

    In the hypothesis of the epithelial barrier, the inflamed bronchial mucosa becomes hyper-reactive to various stimuli, whether allergic or not, which can trigger episodes of asthma exacerbations. Among the environmental risk factors, allergens stand out, represented mainly by house dust mites, dog and cat hair, cockroaches, fungi, pollens, among other well-known triggers of asthma exacerbations.5

    Growing interest has been focused on pollutants and inhaled irritants present in the home, inside or adjacent to the internal space of the residence, which can harm the respiratory tract and trigger clinical worsening of asthma. Tobacco smoke, use of charcoal stoves, firewood, gas stoves, particulate matter, volatile substances from chemicals used in household cleaning or swimming pool cleaning, use of pesticides, among many, often forgotten, but which may be present in the home environment and need to be detailed in the clinical history of every patient with or without allergic asthma.6,7

    The environment to which the individual is exposed (exposome) continuously influences the clinical control of asthma. The exposome concept considers an individual’s environmental, behavioral, and lifestyle exposures over a lifetime and how these exposures relate to health. In the context of asthma, there are well-known associations, associations that are not fully established, and exposures that demonstrate more distinct effects based on age, chronicity of exposure, and genetic predispositions.8

    Health professionals become the first link in the investigation of environmental factors and how they impact the pathogenesis, symptoms, evolution and morbidity of asthma. When it comes to asthma in the pediatric population, a complex disease with an important gene-environment interaction, the caregiver’s role in the home environment becomes essential.9 Under Antonovsky ‘s salutogenic view, the caregiver represents the most effective agent in promoting home environmental control to avoid both allergic sensitization and asthma exacerbation crises.10

    The central concept of Antonovsky ‘s Salutogenic theory is called sense of coherence (SOC), an individual construct that influences habits that directly interfere with health and adaptive behaviors that can minimize the severity of diseases. The SOC has three main components: the ability to understand an event (comprehensibility), the perception of the potential to manipulate or solve it (manageability) and the meaning given to this event (significance). It consists of a global orientation towards seeing life as structured, manageable and with an emotional meaning.11

    The Salutogenic theory (saluto = health; genesis = origin) proposed in 1979, by Antonovsky – Israeli American sociologist and professor, states that health-promoting factors have a direct impact on the patient’s quality of life. Its assumptions consider health as a result of the adaptive capacity of human beings in the face of life’s adversities.12 When it comes to home environmental control, the caregiver becomes a key player in preventing and controlling exposure to inhaled products and substances that can alter the clinical control of asthma.

    In this context, it is important for health professionals to identify and guide caregivers about the likelihood of certain pollutants and irritants in the home inhalation triggering clinical worsening of asthma. Therefore, this integrative review proposes to present the most common and frequent pollutants or inhalation irritants that can be found in the home environment, highlighting their possible repercussions in the worsening of health through aggression to the respiratory epithelium and consequent impairment of lung function in pediatric patients with asthma, and in this context, highlight the caregiver’s role - through the salutogenic perspective - as a modifying agent for adequate environmental control.

    Materials and Methods

    Selection Criteria

    The research was carried out in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (Lilacs), Web of Science and Scopus, with the objective of describing the pollutants and inhalant irritants most found in the home environment, their possible repercussions on the respiratory epithelium and lung function that can worsen health and worsen the clinical control of asthma in the pediatric population. The sense of coherence of the salutogenic theory has been investigated in studies directed at asthma and other diseases.

    Search Strategy

    The following descriptors were used: air pollution AND asthma OR/AND lung function; irritants AND asthma; tobacco AND asthma AND pulmonary function; particulate matter AND asthma; disinfectants AND asthma OR/AND lung function; hydrocarbons, fluorinated AND asthma; odorants AND asthma; chloramines AND/OR pool AND asthma; pesticide AND asthma AND lung function; Antonovsky ‘s sense of coherence. The inclusion criteria used for the research were: observational or experimental articles related to the repercussions of pollutants and inhaled irritants on the respiratory tract in humans, in addition to review articles that were published in the last 10 years, in English and Spanish, searched up to September 2023; and a textbook on the sense of coherence of Antonovsky ‘s salutogenic theory (Figure 2).

    Figure 2 Article search strategy flowchart.

    This article is focused only on pollutants and irritants of an inhalation nature, which can be frequently identified in any household and which have a potential deleterious effect on the respiratory tract. It highlights, therefore, the main products found, properties of action and possible repercussions in the worsening of health, especially in asthma, but it does not intend to be an exhaustive review on the subject.

    Publications such as comments, editorials, letters, studies with results from other affected organs other than the respiratory tract, studies that projected exposure effects on the child during the mother’s prenatal period, animal studies, case reports and duplicate articles were excluded. After sorting by reading the titles and abstracts evaluated by the reviewer (G.V.A.G.L.), the full reading began, with more articles being included through manual search, through the references of the initially pre-selected studies on the subject. Although animal studies were not included, studies of some substances in the respiratory tract of animals may have been cited to better elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms of inflammation in asthma.

    Which Pollutants and Irritants in the House May Aggravate the Health of Patients with Asthma?

    Early identification and removal of polluting particles and inhaled irritants, especially in the home environment, are effective ways to maintain health and prevent asthma exacerbations. The lungs are structures widely exposed to ambient air, with approximately 100 square meters of surface area in contact with the outside world, compared only to the skin in terms of the intensity of environmental exposure. With each respiratory movement, various particles, gases and microorganisms transit between the ambient air and the alveoli, which may cause sensitization or damage to the respiratory epithelium.13

    Allergic tests can identify sensitization to inhaled antigens and their correlation with the clinic define an allergic pattern in the individual. Negative tests, therefore, are useful to exclude an allergic basis for asthma and it is in this context that the environmental recall becomes even more essential to identify substances and inhaled particles, present in the home, that can trigger symptoms and exacerbation crises of asthma. Asthma in the pediatric age group, a period totally susceptible to the care of a caregiver responsible for environmental control.14,15

    Substances and inhaled products that can be found in the home environment should be identified by health professionals who care for patients with asthma in the pediatric age group, to better guide caregivers on what should be avoided to protect the patient’s health. Below, the seven main and most common products considered irritants and pollutants inhaled at home, which can worsen the patient’s respiratory health, will be listed and commented on (Table 1).16–26

    Table 1 Substances Identified in the Home Environment That Can Affect the Airways

    Secondhand Smoke Exposure in the Pediatric Population

    Secondary exposure to environmental tobacco, cigar, or e-cigarette vapors has been associated with increased chances of exacerbations and lack of clinical control of asthma. Effects of pre- or postnatal tobacco smoke constitute one of the most important risk factors for childhood asthma, leading to alterations in lung development, even in utero, and in immunological and epigenetic responses that favor asthma.27,28

    Tobacco smoke, now so well known, is a mixture of compounds including carbon and nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, nitrosamines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbonyls, and numerous other chemicals, many of which are known toxicants that can induce inflammation and responses altered immune. Among these compounds, nicotine and its metabolites are the most responsible for chemical dependence and deleterious effects on the lungs, such as intense inflammatory reaction, allergic sensitization and changes in lung function.29

    Negative health outcomes are not limited to indoor smoking, but also the continued elimination of tobacco compounds from people who smoked outside the home. In addition, residues from tobacco smoke, known as third-hand smoke, can persist for weeks to months in the home, adhering to surfaces and house dust after the smoke has evaporated. The residue is composed of chemicals that can react with other atmospheric pollutants, forming volatile toxic particles.30

    Nicotine metabolites, such as cotinine, have been used as an objective measure of passive exposure in epidemiological studies. Self-reported measurements of exposure to secondhand smoke did not show good specificity when compared to measurements of plasma cotinine. In fact, approximately 41% of children whose parents reported in the clinical history that they were not active smokers in the household had detectable levels of plasma cotinine, with mean plasma cotinine levels increasing as the number of household smokers increased.16

    On the other hand, the use of electronic cigarettes has been replacing the use of conventional cigarettes and has been increasingly used by adolescents. Recent findings suggest that e-cigarettes, also known as e-cigs, electronic nicotine delivery devices, e-vaporizers or vapers, can cause respiratory damage in a similar way to traditional cigarettes and still pose other risks to users and passive inhalants.31

    Vapers are devices that have a battery, an atomizer and a tank or cartridge to contain the e-liquid composed of propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, in addition to several other compounds of common cigarettes, which when they decompose form carbonyl compounds with known inhalation toxicity and irritating properties to the respiratory epithelium. Other harmful compounds are liquid flavorings, such as diacetyl (2,3-butanedione), which can cause irreversible lung disease.32

    Flavoring agents with potential respiratory hazards due to possible volatility and respiratory irritant properties are: acetoin, camphor, and cyclohexanone (minty flavor), benzaldehyde (cherry or almond flavor), cinnamaldehyde (cinnamon flavor), cresol (leather or medicinal flavor), butyraldehyde (chocolate flavor) and isoamyl acetate (banana flavor).33

    Although smoking cessation is the most appropriate strategy, this has not been shown to be a intervention, as it depends on the cooperation of the smoker’s family members. Smoking outside the home may not be an effective mitigation strategy due to the residual risk of smoking.34 It is important to advise caregivers to stop smoking and keep the home environment free of tobacco smoke, cigars or electronic vaporizers, as the health risks are serious and passive smoking has been associated with a worse clinical outcome of asthma in childhood and adolescence.

    Particulate Matter (PM) Indoors

    Particulate matter (PM) can be formed by solid or liquid particles that remain in air suspension invisibly, different from large particles, which can be visible with appropriate lighting, such as fog or dust. These particles can be organic chemical compounds, acids such as sulfates and nitrates, metals and even dust. PMs are identified by their aerodynamic size or diameter: PM0.1 is < 0.1µm in diameter, PM2.5 is < 2.5µm and PM10 is < 10µm in diameter and are commonly emitted from combustion sources.35

    The fine particles (PM2.5) manage to reach the pulmonary alveoli, where they will be captured by local cells and transported by the bloodstream, whereas the finer particles (PM0.1) pass through the alveolar-capillary membrane and confer greater systemic toxicity. In many parts of the world, smoking, incense burning, candles and mosquito coils are the main sources of PM2.5 indoors, where poor ventilation in homes can lead to extremely high levels of indoor pollution and deterioration of the environment lung function.36

    The burning of incense for religious ceremonies or to perfume the air at home, in addition to the burning of repellents to eliminate mosquitoes, have generated toxic pollutants that have been associated with alveolar oxidative damage, respiratory diseases and even lung cancer.20

    Particles resulting from the combustion of fossils, especially from the combustion of biomass (coal) used in home cooking, contain many heavy metals on their surfaces, such as arsenic, lead, cadmium or compounds such as sulfuric acid or cyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which can be captured during the combustion process and transported on the surface of finer particles (PM2.5) to the pulmonary alveoli. Although the world still depends on biomass fuel for cooking and heating, it is known that public policies for environmental control are still limited. The use of firewood or coal for residential cooking and heating, in poor and cold geographic regions, has become frequent, especially in low-income countries.7

    Natural gas is a popular fuel choice for home cooking. Among all gas appliances, stoves, cooktops and ovens in homes have their particularities, because combustion by-products are emitted directly into the domestic air, such as methane gas, formaldehyde (CH2O), carbon oxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (nitric oxide - NO and nitrogen dioxide - NO2) and cause oxidative stress with inflammation, changes in lung function and a significant increase in Th2 profile pro-inflammatory cytokines.26

    Repercussions on the respiratory tract can be observed even in early but intense phases of exposure to these materials suspended in the air. PM can also lead to chronic local inflammation and even pulmonary fibrosis in prolonged exposures. When there is overload of the macrophage function and the cells of the respiratory epithelium are exposed, oxidative stress is triggered and a cascade of inflammatory events, with production of cytokines IL-25, IL-33, TSLP, become evident.36

    Special consideration is also being given to microplastics (PMs), which have a diameter of less than 0.5 cm and can be found in the air, indoors. The main sources of PMs for indoor air can be identified in textile products (clothes, curtains, mattresses), toys, rubber materials, kitchen utensils (plates, cups, bowls, bottles), electrical cables, electronics, indoor paint and cleaning agents, with a higher concentration in bedrooms.37

    Inhalation is the main route of human exposure to microplastics and their accumulation in the human airways can cause inflammatory and immune responses in the lung interstitium due to the cytotoxic effect of the particles. Oxidative stress with repercussions on lung function are the main results of respiratory epithelial damage.38

    Guidance for caregivers should emphasize the importance of having a ventilated home environment, with windows, preferably in urban areas free of burning garbage or biomass close to housing, clarify the risks that cooking indoors can bring to children’s lungs asthmatic and responsible. Alternatives such as having charcoal stoves outside the home, in the open air, or in ventilated residential annexes, can reduce exposure to particulate matter, especially in low-income populations.39

    Substances in Household Cleaning Products

    There are a variety of cleaning products and quantitative assessments of their presence in the air are challenging because these products are complex mixtures of chemicals that require different sampling methods and analytical measurement.40

    Chemicals that require the most attention in relation to respiratory effects in asthma are corrosive ones, such as strong acids and bases (including ammonia and hypochlorite) and quaternary ammonium compounds. Solvents, including glycols and glycol ethers, as well as propellants, which are generally weak lower airway irritants, can potentiate the effects on the respiratory epithelium, especially if they are mixed in the same cleaning product.41

    In Table 2, the chemical substances are presented according to the main molecular group, properties of action and risks of exacerbation or induction of asthma in people who may be exposed during household cleaning. We identified 24 substances that are more present in general cleaning products in spray or volatile form and that exert an irritating mechanism on the respiratory epithelium; three substances have the potential to sensitize asthma (benzalkonium chloride, ethylenediamine acid tetraacetic – EDTA and monoethanolamine); and six substances (salicylic acid, sodium benzoate, propylene glycol, glycerol, propylidinetrimethanol and bronopol) have little evidence as possible sensitizers in asthma.40,42

    Table 2 Characteristics of Chemical Substances Found in Residential Cleaning Products

    More than 95% of volatile household cleaners contain chemicals that can irritate the respiratory epithelium. For example, sanitizers, considered disinfectants and degreasers, may contain citric acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, ethylenediamine acid tetraacetic acid (EDTA), benzalkonium chloride, monoethanolamine, diethylene glycolamine, alkyldimethyl amino oxide, methylisothiazolinone, benzisothiazolinone, chlormethylisothiazolinone, sodium benzoate, propylene glycol, glycerol, propylidinetrimethanol, lactic acid, malate disodium and salicylic acid. Liquid waxes for illustrating furniture and floors may contain bronopol and morpholine. Cleaning products that give off fragrance may contain benzyl alcohol. Descalers may contain sulfamic acid, and disinfectants and bleaches may contain sodium hypochlorite, sodium p- cumenesulfonate, and carmoisine.40

    Guidance on avoiding the use of cleaning products or spray preparations containing mainly benzalkonium chloride and EDTA is important to prevent the induction or worsening of asthma, especially for those patients who are under the care of a guardian and are vulnerable to the dynamics cleaning in the residential environment. If the use of these spray preparations is not prohibitive, guidance can be given on keeping children with asthma away from home during the cleaning period at home and on the use of a mask by the caregiver. The recommendation for caregivers is that these products can be replaced or that the limitations of using these substances, especially in sprays, in closed environments be informed.43

    Fluorinated Hydrocarbons

    Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), known as freons, were used as refrigerants until the early 2000s. Due to their ozone-depleting properties, freons have increasingly been replaced by chlorine-free refrigerants such as fluorinated hydrocarbons.44

    Fluorinated hydrocarbons, which can thermally degrade to toxic hydrofluoric acid, are widely used as cooling agents in air conditioning systems, refrigerators, and as propellants in some medical aerosols. When fluorinated hydrocarbons are used in the presence of combustion, thermal degradation can lead to the formation of hydrofluoric acid, which is a known causative agent of irritant-induced asthma. Therefore, combustion sources, such as fireplaces, can be a risk for those using air conditioning in closed rooms and in confined residential environments.21

    Hydrofluoric acid is associated with chemical pneumonitis, especially after exposure indoors, resulting from the combustion of fluorinated hydrocarbons, causing respiratory symptoms and changes in lung function after months of exposure. Guidance for caregivers, as providers of home security and well-being, should emphasize the risks of using fireplaces and heaters indoors, especially in bedrooms. In addition to the risks of inhaling particulate matter, the products of combustion and thermal degradation lead to the formation of substances that irritate the respiratory epithelium with a potential risk of exacerbating asthma.45

    Fragrances and the Respiratory Tract

    Although most of the substances used to generate the fragrance of perfumes are benign, a minority have the potential to cause adverse health effects, notably allergic contact dermatitis resulting from skin sensitization to compounds such as isoeugenol or eugenol. As a result, industry guidelines, as well as comprehensive trade bodies, of which perhaps the most important is International fragrance Association (IFRA), have banned certain materials and strictly limited the use of others in their products.46

    In a recent review, Basketter et al concluded that mechanisms of allergic sensitization with the use of fragrances seem highly unlikely to occur in the respiratory epithelium. Although some sensory/psychosomatic effects are possible, adverse effects to the respiratory tract resulting from fragrance inhalation are uncommon and minimal, with low irritating characteristics, which highlight the need for methodologically rigorous studies supported by the Bradford Hill causality criteria, based on the biological plausibility of the reaction of the indicated substance. Preferably, guidelines for caregivers are related to the excess of these products in closed environments, which should be avoided, especially those containing strong fragrances.47

    Volatile Pool Compounds

    The need for entertainment space at home has become urgent in recent years, both due to the current behavior of society and the safety and comfort that are generated. The presence of a swimming pool in a residential environment or even its use in leisure environments are reasons for constant concern by caregivers of children who suffer from allergic respiratory processes.48

    Regular physical activity in people with controlled asthma is recommended, as it improves general health and physical resistance, as well as improves parameters of cardiopulmonary capacity, although it is known that increased physical activity can cause exertional bronchial spasm and exacerbation of bronchial asthma in some partially controlled patients.49

    During swimming, bronchial ventilation can increase by 20 to 30 times, which can lead to a change in breathing pattern from nasal to mixed (nasal and pulmonary). Hyperventilation and cold air can induce bronchial spasm through water loss and increased osmolarity in bronchial tissues which, in turn, trigger the release of cellular inflammatory mediators, histamine, prostaglandin, and leukotrienes. In addition, increased bronchial ventilation promotes the penetration of air pollutants, allergens and other nearby irritants. Despite this, swimming is associated with less intensity of post-exercise bronchial spasm compared to running or other sports with the same intensity.50

    The most used method of disinfecting swimming pools is the addition of chlorine, however, the reactivity of chlorine to compounds present in the body of a swimmer, such as the epidermis, urine, sweat, remains of impurities, results in the formation of a wide range of disinfection by-products (DBPs) such as monochloramines, dichloramines, trichloramines, trihalogenomethanes, haloacetic acid, some of which are known to be associated with adverse effects on the respiratory epithelium. Among the DBPs formed in swimming pools, among which more than 10 volatile compounds can be found, is trichloramine (NCl3). NCl3 is formed as a by-product of disinfection in chlorinated pools and can be found in liquid and gaseous phases.51

    In a Cochrane systematic review, the authors collected data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and quasi- RCTs of children and adolescents comparing swimming with other physical activity and concluded that there was no evidence that swimming caused adverse effects in asthma control in young people under 18 years of age with stable asthma of any severity. In a more recent meta-analysis, using RCTs, quasi-experimental studies and intervention studies with disinfection products for swimming pools, the authors concluded that swimming did not result in adverse effects, on the contrary, it resulted in a reduction in bronchial hyperreactivity and bronchospasm exercise-induced.52

    Due to the growing publications on the risks of DBPs in the respiratory tract of home recreational swimmers, there is a need for comparative studies between pool chlorine and other disinfectants considered alternatives, such as ozone, ultraviolet radiation, bromine and salt, in addition to silver and copper ions. The most suitable microbiological and chemical method is the ozonation of water, however, due to the high cost, this method is little used. In the case of using pools with chlorinated water, the guidance to caregivers is that patients with controlled asthma should practice all sports, including swimming. It is important that the pool has air circulation and is installed in an open environment to facilitate the dispersion of compounds suspended in the air.53

    Exposure of Pesticides at Home

    Pesticides are identified as chemical products that can be presented in different formulations and concentrations to be used in different environments: family farming, domestic use, animal sanitary bath and vector control. Situations of exposure vulnerability to these products can be identified regarding: improper disposal of containers, storage in internal rooms of the house, inadequate agricultural practices and lack of awareness of the potential dangers of these products, promoting a greater risk of harmful effects on the environment health during childhood. The concern with children’s exposure to pesticides is related to their toxic properties and the special vulnerability to exposure, which can occur from the prenatal period to older ages.54

    There is a wide variety of chemicals (more than 9000 globally), presented in different formulations and concentrations. The classification of pesticides can correspond to their assignment, for example, insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, disinfectants, repellents and rodenticides. Another practical approach is to classify according to recommendations for use, for example, products for gardening, vector control, veterinary (animal baths) and agricultural.26

    In general, children constitute a special exposure group, which can occur through multiple routes (transplacental, inhalation, skin and ingestion) simultaneously or sequentially during life. Inhalation of toxic substances occurs through breathable particles or aerosols that are spread by direct application of the product at home or through residual volatile vapors from pesticides applied adjacent to the home.55

    Rural households are in an even more dangerous scenario, because children can inhale pesticides that are sprayed on freshly treated crops in the home area or have these products stored indoors. Some pesticides are well known and are part of the products that can be inhaled, among them acaricides (carbamates, nitrophenol derivatives, organochlorine compounds, organophosphate compounds), fungicides (dinitrophenols, thiocarbamates and dithiocarbamates, sulfur), herbicides (anilides, sulfonylureas, paraquat), insecticides (carbofuran, malathion, cypermethrin), rodenticides (warfarin) and repellents (diethyltoluamide). All these pesticides have a common characteristic, when applied they become volatile and can trigger an intense irritative process in the respiratory epithelium, some even pulmonary fibrosis, such as paraquat.54,56

    Health professionals who assist patients, who come mainly from rural areas, must be careful to take a good clinical history and identify the pesticides that can cause clinical worsening of asthma. Once factors that facilitate the child’s exposure to these products have been identified, their caregivers need to be instructed to avoid handling and using them at home. Alternatives to the use of natural products should be encouraged to replace these pesticides.56

    Reflections on the Role of the Caregiver in Integration with Asthma Patient Health Maintenance

    One of the main effective actions in asthma management is to avoid exposure to environmental allergens, pollutants and inhaled irritants. In the pediatric population, asthma reflects some singularities, since children and adolescents are passive agents and the greatest demand for maintaining adequate environmental control falls on caregivers.1

    Although there is no description in the literature of publications on the caregiver’s sense of coherence and environmental control in asthma, this article presents a new look at an old problem, now guided by the salutogenic perspective: promoting a healthy home environment, with reduction and prevention of exposure to pollutants and inhaled irritants will have positive repercussions on the clinical control of asthma.

    Previous studies have shown that a high sense of coherence is related to better health outcomes, and this has been observed in the care of diabetic patients, with neurological diseases, autoimmune diseases, neoplastic diseases, in oral health care and even during the covid-19 pandemic.57,58 SOC, a construct of Antonovsky ‘s salutogenic theory, is a personal orientation for identifying, coping and solving problems, which has become a fundamental concept in public health, particularly for health promotion.59

    Antonovsky ‘s inspiration for researching this phenomenon came when he studied climacteric women who had lived in concentration camps during World War II, finding that some of them maintained good physical and mental health. For the creator of the salutogenic theory, SOC has a direct effect on people’s health status, acting in such a way as to stimulate behavior patterns that promote health benefits. The SOC would be related to the ability to perceive one’s own body and the environment that surrounds it, determining whether the situation to which the individual is exposed is dangerous, safe or pleasant.10

    The formation of the SOC is a continuum, being developed in childhood, built through the interactions of the social and family environment, and formed around 30 years of life, and can be extended to more advanced ages. It is believed that the SOC is an individual resource that can influence health behaviors, in the search for better clinical control, especially of chronic diseases.11

    From the perspective of clinical asthma control, a high SOC may promote changes in the household exposure. Not only will aeroallergens be identified and avoided, but pollutants and inhaled irritants will be removed from the environment, especially from children and adolescents with asthma. Caregivers of patients with asthma will be the modifiers of the home environment, making the living space adequate to prevent asthma exacerbations. Figure 3 illustrates, in addition to environmental allergens, the main products and irritants that can affect the health of asthmatics and the role of protection and promotion of asthma control from the salutogenic perspective of a caregiver.12

    Figure 3 Home scenario with possible allergens, pollutants and harmful inhalation irritants for the child with asthma, highlighting the role of the caregiver, under the salutogenic perspective.

    Conclusion

    As part of the development of strategies regarding environmental control measures, a history of the home environment should be obtained to assess the main exposures to which the patient with asthma is subject. Environmental control approaches should be evidence-based and aimed at reducing these exposures as an important part of asthma management.1

    Personalized and multifaceted environmental interventions, particularly in the home environment, are endorsed by international guidelines and may be similar in terms of effectiveness to controller medications. Environmental control measures for total removal of the source (eradication of the allergen or inhaled irritant), mitigation strategies (reduction of the amount of these substances in the air) and source control (control in the production of inhaled pollutants) have been described and advocated by the main guidelines of asthma, such as the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA).60

    One of the limitations of current knowledge is that many other substances in the future may be identified as related to exacerbations and clinical worsening of asthma and have not yet been analyzed in studies with adequate methodology, as the topic is broadly addressed.

    Environmental control recommendations, therefore, include prior knowledge of the most common pollutants and inhaled irritants that can be found at home; guidance and education for caregivers of children and adolescents with asthma on how to reduce exposure; adaptation of environmental control measures according to the patient’s socioeconomic conditions and the participation of public health policies in facing the commercialization of products that are known to be harmful to health, in particular to the respiratory epithelium.

    Studies that investigate the relationship between the caregiver’s SOC and clinical control of asthma, focusing on home environmental control, are important and necessary, so that intervention measures can be effectively adopted for the adequate management of asthma in the pediatric population.

    Abbreviations

    ICSs, inhaled corticosteroids; IL, interleukin; Th, helper T; IgE, immunoglobulin E; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin; SOC, sense of coherence; PM, particulate matter; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; DBPs, disinfection byproducts; NCl3, trichloramines; EDTA, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid; CFCs, chlorofluorocarbons; HCFC, hydrochlorofluorocarbon; IFRA, international Fragrance Association; RCTs, randomized clinical trials; NAEPP, national asthma education and prevention program; GINA, global initiative for asthma.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to acknowledge the Postgraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health linked to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

    Author Contributions

    All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

    Funding

    This study did not receive any specific funding.

    Disclosure

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this work.

    References

    1. Martin J, Townshend J, Brodlie M. Diagnosis and management of asthma in children. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022;6(1):e001277. doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001277

    2. Hurst JH, Zhao C, Hostetler HP, Ghiasi Gorveh M, Lang JE, Goldstein BA. Environmental and clinical data utility in pediatric asthma exacerbation risk prediction models. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12911-022-01847-0

    3. Altman MC, Calatroni A, Ramratnam S, et al. Endotype of allergic asthma with airway obstruction in urban children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(5):1198–1209. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.040

    4. Papi A, Brightling C, Pedersen SE, Reddel HK. Asthma. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):783–800. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33311-1

    5. Celebi Sozener Z, Ozdel Ozturk B, Cerci P, et al. Epithelial barrier hypothesis: effect of the external exposome on the microbiome and epithelial barriers in allergic disease. Allergy. 2022;77(5):1418–1449. doi:10.1111/all.15240

    6. Cockcroft D. Environmental causes of asthma. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;39(01):012–018. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606219

    7. Rosário Filho NA, Urrutia-Pereira M, D’Amato G, et al. Air pollution and indoor settings. World Allergy Organ J. 2021;14(1):100499. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100499

    8. Subramanian A, Khatri SB. The exposome and asthma. Clin Chest Med. 2019;40(1):107–123. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2018.10.017

    9. Busse WW, Kraft M. Current unmet needs and potential solutions to uncontrolled asthma. Eur Respir Rev. 2022;31(163):210176. doi:10.1183/16000617.0176-2021

    10. d’Alessio PA. Salutogenesis and beyond. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32(1):e12783. doi:10.1111/dth.12783

    11. Lindström B, Eriksson M. Contextualizing salutogenesis and antonovsky in public health development. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:238–244. doi:10.1093/heapro/dal016

    12. Bhattacharya S, Pradhan KB, Bashar MA. Salutogenesis: a bona fide guide towards health preservation. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2017;6(2):169–170. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc

    13. Leas BF, D’Anci KE, Apter AJ, et al. Effectiveness of indoor allergen reduction in asthma management: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(5):1854–1869. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.02.001

    14. Custovic A, de Moira AP, Murray CS, Simpson A. Environmental influences on childhood asthma: allergens. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023;34(2):1–19. doi:10.1111/pai.13915

    15. Raju S, Siddharthan T, McCormack MC. Indoor air pollution and respiratory health. Clin Chest Med. 2020;41(4):825–843. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2020.08.014

    16. Neophytou AM, Oh SS, White MJ, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure and asthma outcomes among African-American and Latino children with asthma. Thorax. 2018;73(11):1041–1048. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211383

    17. Sugier P, Sarnowski C, Granell R, et al. Genome‐wide interaction study of early‐life smoking exposure on time‐to‐asthma onset in childhood. Clin Exp Allergy. 2019;49(10):1342–1351. doi:10.1111/cea.13476

    18. He Z, Wu H, Zhang S, et al. The association between secondhand smoke and childhood asthma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(10):2518–2531. doi:10.1002/ppul.24961

    19. Niu X, Jones T, BéruBé K, Chuang HC, Sun J, Ho KF. The oxidative capacity of indoor source combustion derived particulate matter and resulting respiratory toxicity. Sci Total Environ. 2021;767:144391. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144391

    20. Weinmann T, Forster F, von Mutius E, et al. Association between occupational exposure to disinfectants and asthma in young adults working in cleaning or health services. J Occup Environ Med. 2019;61(9):754–759. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001655

    21. Lindström I, Ryhänen A, Jungewelter S, Suojalehto H, Suuronen K. Asthma onset after exposure to fluorinated hydrocarbons in the presence of combustion. Am J Ind Med. 2020;63(11):1054–1058. doi:10.1002/ajim.23181

    22. Saijo Y, Yoshioka E, Sato Y, et al. Relations of mold, stove, and fragrance products on childhood wheezing and asthma: a prospective cohort study from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Indoor Air. 2022;32(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/ina.12931

    23. Kanikowska A, Napiórkowska-Baran K, Graczyk M, Kucharski M. Influence of chlorinated water on the development of allergic diseases – an overview. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25(4):651–655. doi:10.26444/aaem/79810

    24. Hwang SH, Park WM. Indoor air concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) in multiple healthcare facilities. Environ Geochem Health. 2020;42(5):1487–1496. doi:10.1007/s10653-019-00441-0

    25. Lebel ED, Finnegan CJ, Ouyang Z, Jackson RB. Methane and NO x emissions from natural gas stoves, cooktops, and ovens in residential homes. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56(4):2529–2539. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04707

    26. Pascale A, Laborde A. Impact of pesticide exposure in childhood. Rev Environ Health. 2020;35(3):221–227. doi:10.1515/reveh-2020-0011

    27. Butz AM, Tsoukleris M, Elizabeth Bollinger M, et al. Association between second hand smoke (SHS) exposure and caregiver stress in children with poorly controlled asthma. J Asthma. 2019;56(9):915–926. doi:10.1080/02770903.2018.1509989

    28. Johansson E, Martin LJ, He H, et al. Second-hand smoke and NFE2L2 genotype interaction increases paediatric asthma risk and severity. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021;51(6):801–810. doi:10.1111/cea.13815

    29. Merianos AL, Jandarov RA, Gordon JS, Lyons MS, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Child tobacco smoke exposure and healthcare resource utilization patterns. Pediatr Res. 2020;88(4):571–579. doi:10.1038/s41390-020-0997-0

    30. Shen M, Li Y, Song B, Zhou C, Gong J, Zeng G. Smoked cigarette butts: unignorable source for environmental microplastic fibers. Sci Total Environ. 2021;791:148384. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148384

    31. Clapp PW, Jaspers I. Electronic cigarettes: their constituents and potential links to asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017;17(11):79. doi:10.1007/s11882-017-0747-5

    32. Ratajczak A, Feleszko W, Smith DM, Goniewicz M. How close are we to definitively identifying the respiratory health effects of e-cigarettes? Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018;12(7):549–556. doi:10.1080/17476348.2018.1483724

    33. Carson JL, Zhou L, Brighton L, et al. Temporal structure/function variation in cultured differentiated human nasal epithelium associated with acute single exposure to tobacco smoke or E-cigarette vapor. Inhal Toxicol. 2017;29(3):137–144. doi:10.1080/08958378.2017.1318985

    34. Gakkhar A, Mehendale A, Mehendale S. Tobacco cessation intervention for young people. Cureus. 2022;14(10):1–7. doi:10.7759/cureus.30308

    35. Liu C, Chen R, Sera F, et al. Ambient particulate air pollution and daily mortality in 652 cities. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(8):705–715. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1817364

    36. De Grove KC, Provoost S, Brusselle GG, Joos GF, Maes T. Insights in particulate matter-induced allergic airway inflammation: focus on the epithelium. Clin Exp Allergy. 2018;48(7):773–786. doi:10.1111/cea.13178

    37. Ageel HK, Harrad S, Abdallah MAE. Occurrence, human exposure, and risk of microplastics in the indoor environment. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2022;24(1):17–31. doi:10.1039/D1EM00301A

    38. Hussain S, Parker S, Edwards K, et al. Effects of indoor particulate matter exposure on daily asthma control. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(4):375–380.e3. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2019.07.020

    39. Wu J, Zhong T, Zhu Y, Ge D, Lin X, Li Q. Effects of particulate matter (PM) on childhood asthma exacerbation and control in Xiamen, China. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):194. doi:10.1186/s12887-019-1530-7

    40. Hadrup N, Frederiksen M, Wedebye EB, et al. Asthma‐inducing potential of 28 substances in spray cleaning products—assessed by quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) testing and literature review. J Appl Toxicol. 2022;42(1):130–153. doi:10.1002/jat.4215

    41. Vizcaya D, Mirabelli MC, Gimeno D, et al. Cleaning products and short-term respiratory effects among female cleaners with asthma. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(11):757–763. doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-102046

    42. Clausen PA, Frederiksen M, Sejbæk CS, et al. Chemicals inhaled from spray cleaning and disinfection products and their respiratory effects. A comprehensive review. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;229:113592. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113592

    43. Abrams EM. Cleaning products and asthma risk: a potentially important public health concern. Can Med Assoc J. 2020;192(7):E164–E165. doi:10.1503/cmaj.200025

    44. Lawal AT. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. A review. Fantke P, ed. Cogent Environ Sci. 2017;3(1):1339841. doi:10.1080/23311843.2017.1339841

    45. Lee YJ, Jeong IB. Chemical pneumonitis by prolonged hydrogen fluoride inhalation. Respir Med Case Rep. 2021;32:101338. doi:10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101338

    46. Santana FPR, da Silva RC, Ponci V, et al. Dehydrodieugenol improved lung inflammation in an asthma model by inhibiting the STAT3/SOCS3 and MAPK pathways. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;180(May):114175. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114175

    47. Basketter DA, Huggard J, Kimber I. Fragrance inhalation and adverse health effects: the question of causation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;104(March):151–156. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.03.011

    48. Andersson M, Backman H, Nordberg G, et al. Early life swimming pool exposure and asthma onset in children – a case-control study. Environ Heal. 2018;17(1):34. doi:10.1186/s12940-018-0383-0

    49. Beggs S, Foong YC, Le HCT, Noor D, Wood-Baker R, Walters JAE. Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009607.pub2

    50. Seys SF, Feyen L, Keirsbilck S, Adams E, Dupont LJ, Nemery B. An outbreak of swimming-pool related respiratory symptoms: an elusive source of trichloramine in a municipal indoor swimming pool. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2015;218(4):386–391. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.001

    51. Wu T, Földes T, Lee LT, et al. Real-time measurements of gas-phase trichloramine (NCl 3) in an indoor aquatic center. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(12):8097–8107. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c07413

    52. Ramachandran HJ, Jiang Y, Shan CH, Tam WWS, Wang W. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of swimming on lung function and asthma control in children with asthma. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;120:103953. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103953

    53. Päivinen M, Keskinen K, Putus T, Kujala UM, Kalliokoski P, Tikkanen HO. Asthma, allergies and respiratory symptoms in different activity groups of swimmers exercising in swimming halls. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021;13(1):119. doi:10.1186/s13102-021-00349-2

    54. Rodrigues MDB, Carvalho DSD, Chong-Silva DC. Association between exposure to pesticides and allergic diseases in children and adolescents: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Pediatr. 2022;98(6):551–564. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2021.10.007

    55. Islam JY, Hoppin J, Mora AM, et al. Respiratory and allergic outcomes among 5-year-old children exposed to pesticides. Thorax. 2023;78(1):41–49. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218068

    56. Fishwick D, Harding AH, Chen Y, Pearce N, Frost G. Asthma in pesticide users: an update from the Great Britain Prospective Investigation of Pesticide Applicators’ Health (PIPAH) cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2022;79(6):380–387. doi:10.1136/oemed-2021-107486

    57. Polhuis KCMM, Vaandrager L, Koelen MA, Geleijnse JM, Soedamah-Muthu SS. Effects of a salutogenic healthy eating program in type 2 diabetes (the SALUD Study): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023;12:e40490. doi:10.2196/40490

    58. Tóth ÁL, Kívés Z, Szovák E, et al. Sense of coherence and self-rated aggression of adolescents during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on the effects of animal assisted activities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20(1):769. doi:10.3390/ijerph20010769

    59. Drageset S, Ellingsen S, Haugan G. Salutogenic nursing home care: antonovsky’s salutogenic health theory as a guide to wellbeing. Health Promot Int. 2023;38(2):1–11. doi:10.1093/heapro/daad017

    60. Kader R, Kennedy K, Portnoy JM. Indoor environmental interventions and their effect on asthma outcomes. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(3):17. doi:10.1007/s11882-018-0774-x

    Source link

    Introduction

    Breathing, a fundamental physiological process that plays a crucial role in overall health and well-being, is often taken for granted.1 According to Nelson et al,2 the core of many breathing exercises is diaphragmatic breathing, which is considered the most fundamental demonstration of core function. These exercises involve retraining the muscles of respiration, improving ventilation, and optimizing gaseous exchange.3

    Diaphragmatic breathing is recognized as a key component of many exercise protocols and practices, such as meditation, ancient eastern religions, martial arts, and yoga exercises. Diaphragmatic breathing involves the active engagement of the diaphragm to facilitate deep and efficient inhalation and exhalation. For instance, yogic breathing exercises, which originate from the yoga tradition, play a significant role in promoting relaxation, optimizing lung function, fostering emotional balance, and facilitating self-regulation.4 Many of these exercise practices and protocols not only offer diaphragmatic breathing but also incorporate other techniques such as nasal breathing, slow exhalation with pauses, smoothness, steadiness, and self-observation.

    Elements of exercise programs in rehabilitation, including the ones mentioned above, have long been recognized for their significant contributions and effectiveness. This type of breathing exercises often encompasses a variety of techniques aimed at improving lung function enhancing oxygenation and strengthening the muscles involved in respiration.5–7 They play a role in helping patients recover from conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD),8 asthma9 and post-surgical recuperation.10

    Breathing exercises aim to improve pulmonary status, increase endurance, and enhance overall function in daily living activities.3 In particular, traditional breathing exercises such as slow breathing, pursed lip breathing, and incentive spirometry have been proven effective in enhancing respiratory capacity and alleviating symptoms associated with these conditions.11–13 However, the success of these exercises can be influenced by factors such as adherence, motivation levels and the perception of routines.14,15

    Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in specific often involves a range of breathing exercises designed to meet the needs of patients. One example is diaphragmatic breathing exercise, which focuses on improving the efficiency of the diaphragm muscle for inhalation.16 This technique encourages deep, slow breaths to maximize lung expansion and enhance ventilation.17 Pursed lip breathing exercise also helps prevent airway collapse by maintaining positive pressure during exhalation reducing breathlessness in conditions like COPD.18 In addition, incentive spirometry devices guide patients through inhalations to increase lung capacity and clear airways after surgery.19 These exercises are crucial in pulmonary rehabilitation programs as they not only improve lung function but also help individuals regain control over their breathing.

    The benefits of incorporating these exercises into rehabilitation are widely recognized. However, some people may face challenges in maintaining timing, frequency or focus on their breath during these exercises.20 Therefore, it is important to provide guidance that helps individuals maintain a breathing rhythm and awareness.

    Virtual Reality (VR) technology has made advancements in recent years bringing innovative solutions to various fields, including healthcare.21 With its interactive and immersive features, VR has the potential to revolutionize breathing exercises by making them engaging and enjoyable.22 Patients can be taken to tranquil settings for guided meditation, exciting adventures, or serene landscapes by combining therapeutic breathing exercises with engaging virtual environments and scenarios.23 This combination does not help distract patients from the nature of conventional exercises but also motivates them to actively participate potentially improving their adherence to rehabilitation routines. Furthermore, real time feedback and gamified elements provided by VR enable patients to track their progress and challenge themselves making the process of enhancing function not more effective but also more enjoyable.24

    VR offers an experience where patients actively participate in their rehabilitation creating a sense of presence and control. What sets VR apart is its ability to completely immerse users in environments making them feel like they are physically present in that world. This immersive nature of VR can be incredibly helpful in reducing stress and anxiety during breathing exercises.25 Many patients with conditions often feel anxious and uncomfortable due to the limitations imposed by their condition. Through the utilization of VR, patients can be sensory transported to serene and calming environments such as beaches, tranquil forests, or soothing meditation gardens. This immersive experience helps patients mentally escape from their discomforts and anxieties creating an atmosphere for effective breathing exercises and rehabilitation.25

    Moreover, the interactivity offered by VR brings a level of engagement.26 This means that patients can actively take part in their rehabilitation routines while immersed in a world often mimicking real life activities. For example, they can follow the instructions of an instructor as they engage in deep breathing exercises while observing how their avatar responds within the virtual environment. The ability to interact with objects and manipulate them within these spaces fosters a sense of control which can be particularly empowering for individuals undergoing rehabilitation.27

    In years, there has been a growing trend in utilizing VR to aid breathing exercise. However, there is lack of literature on how these exercises are currently incorporated into VR experiences making it challenging to evaluate their effectiveness. Particularly noteworthy is a scoping review that examines the current state of knowledge on this phenomenon. The only similar study that seems to have exist is Pancini et al study28 on the significance of VR breathing exercise in promoting mental health, while those on pulmonary rehabilitation is very limited. Additionally, it remains uncertain which rehabilitation outcomes have been accessed and whether these interventions yield results.

    Literature Review

    Virtual reality has grown increasingly common in healthcare intervention, notably in exercise and rehabilitation programs. The use of VR as a feasible tool for breathing exercises in rehabilitation has been examined. Numerous research has investigated the viability and efficiency of adopting VR in diverse contexts. In one study, patients with COPD employed immersive VR headsets as part of a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise program.29 Twelve COPD patients took part in a six-week VR headset-based HIIT training as part of the study. Short bursts of high-intensity activity were alternated with rest or low-intensity exercise as part of the HIIT program. The patients were provided an immersive experience utilizing the VR headset, which lessened their feeling of effort and helped to inspire them. The feasibility and acceptability of VR-HIIT for COPD patients was determined by the authors. Without experiencing any serious side effects, the patients were able to conclude the HIIT program in a safe manner. Additionally, they noted that the VR experience was pleasurable and that it kept them motivated. The study’s findings show that VR-HIIT may be a novel and promising PR technique for COPD patients. Better patient results may arise from VR-HIIT’s capacity to increase desire and adherence to workout routines.

    Another study examined the acceptability and safety of a VR-based deep breathing exercise for kids and teenagers getting over a concussion.30 Concussion, categorized as a mild traumatic brain injury, triggers a series of pathophysiological changes and disruptions in brain function. These effects extend to various aspects of respiratory function, such as alterations in breathing rate, mechanics, and the levels of end tidal carbon dioxide.31 Thus, fifteen participants were recruited in the study from a specialty concussion clinic within a tertiary care medical center, aged 11 to 22, who had received a concussion in the previous three months. The participants used a VR headset to pace a 5-minute deep breathing exercise. They were introduced to a serene virtual world and educated in deep breathing strategies by the VR experience. Participants discussed their experiences and any changes in their symptoms following the activity. The outcomes demonstrated that the participants considered the VR-based deep breathing exercise to be both safe and well-tolerated. None of the participants quit the workout or complained of acute discomfort. Three individuals noticed a small increase in headache, nausea, or dizziness; however, these symptoms were simply transient and did not call for medical treatment.

    VR gaming and exergaming-based therapies were found to have weak to insignificant effects on heart rate and oxygen saturation in individuals with respiratory difficulties, and to have minor impacts on dyspnea, according to a systematic review and meta-analysis.32 Seventy-nine people with a range of respiratory conditions, such as cystic fibrosis, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), participated in the evaluation’s 19 trials. The meta-analysis’s findings demonstrated that VR exercise helped people with respiratory disorders improve their quality of life, capacity for activity, and dyspnea. Although the effect sizes were statistically significant, they ranged from low to moderate. The authors concluded that VR exercise is a practical new approach to exercise therapy for those with respiratory issues.

    Furthermore, it was discovered that practicing breathing exercises with a VR system that offers multimodal biofeedback-including tactile and visual feedback-was both entertaining and successful.33 Twelve people took part in the study and used the VR equipment to conduct eight sessions of slow breathing exercises. The VR device guided the participants’ respiration with both physical and visual input. When they breathed appropriately, the participants could feel a slight vibration on their abdomen and view a virtual depiction of their own abdomen. The study’s findings demonstrated how well the multimodal VR system guided the participants’ deep, steady breathing. Following the completion of the slow breathing exercises, the participants’ breathing rate dramatically dropped. The VR system, according to the participants, improved the workouts’ motivation and enjoyment. The multimodal VR system is a viable and promising method of delivering slow breathing exercises, according to the research’s conclusion.

    The findings of these studies, collectively, demonstrate the immense potential of VR breathing exercises as a cutting-edge method for managing respiratory health and rehabilitation. Further research is required to examine the wider applicability and enduring impacts of VR breathing exercises, as well as to determine the most efficient VR therapies for specific medical conditions and demographics.

    Research Question

    This paper provides a scoping review of existing knowledge on the possibilities of integrating VR exercise in breathing rehabilitation. Therefore, this paper aim to provide answer to this research question: “Does VR Based Exercise Therapy Offer Significant Improvement in Patients/Participant Breathing rehabilitation/Function?”

    Materials and Methods

    Methodology

    Scoping reviews are undertaken with the purpose of delineating and examining emerging concepts within a particular field of research.34 In contrast to conventional systematic reviews that focus on narrower research issues and have a well-defined pool of relevant studies, scoping reviews are employed to explore emerging research domains and elucidate fundamental concepts.35

    Search Strategy and Study Selection

    Three electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were searched from October 28 to November 10, 2023. The query of the databases involves the use of the keywords “breathing rehabilitation, respiratory rehabilitation, virtual reality exercise, mixed reality exercise, and augmented reality exercise” to search their core collections. Following the search, citations were retrieved by the citation manager for reference management, while duplicate records were automatically excluded.

    Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

    For this scoping review, articles were included without considering the specific research design. However, it is important to note that only studies involving human participants were considered, and studies involving animals were excluded from the review. articles published in English were included, and no English articles were excluded to avoid potential limitations associated with non-English papers. Specifically, the focus was on studies related to virtual reality exercise for breathing or respiratory rehabilitation, while studies outside the scope of this review were excluded. There were no restrictions regarding the year of publication or geographic region. However, articles that did not directly address the review question were excluded. Additionally, it is important to note that rehabilitation other than breathing was not within the scope of this review. Conference papers, systematic reviews, notes, secondary studies, and other reviews were excluded, prioritizing primary and original studies. The focus was on studies aimed at breathing functions and exercise, without specific limitations on the patient’s or participant’s condition. The emphasis was on including studies that directly contributed to the enhancement of breathing functions.

    Article Selection

    Following the retrieval of 236 citations from the databases, 42 duplicate records were removed automatically. The remaining data was then exported to Excel software version 12.0. The title and abstract of the articles were screened, and a total of 173 references were removed. The remaining 18 articles were subjected to full text screening to examine studies in line with the inclusion criteria and studies directly providing answers to the research. In this process, 10 articles not within the context of this research were excluded (Figure 1).

    Figure 1 Article screening flowchart.

    Quality Assessment

    The eight included studies were appraised to examine the methodological and reporting quality of these articles to rate the article’s risk of bias in planning, execution, and result presentation. In doing these, the Jonas Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist36 for randomized trials was utilized since all the studies were randomized trials37 (Appendix 1). The checklist contained 13 appraisal questions, but only applicable 10 questions were utilized. Articles are rated yes if they checked positive, no if they checked native, and unclear if they are unsure of whether they are positive or negative. At the end, overall ratings were based on %yes. Articles were considered high-quality if they scored 80% and above, moderate quality if they scored between 50% and 60%, and those below 50% were low quality and unfit for inclusion in this scoping review.

    Noteworthy, following the appraisal of the eight included articles, it was interesting to note that all the studies were of high quality and had a low risk of bias, with none of the papers scoring less than 80% Yes (Table 1). Notably, Rodrigues et al38 was the only study that checked positive for all the checklist questions with 100%. True randomization, allocation concealment, and similarity at baseline were positive across all the studies. Similarly, there was a proper record of follow-up, measures, and reliability, and appropriate statistical analysis was considered by all the included studies.

    Table 1 Quality Assessment of the Included Studies

    Data Extraction and Synthesis

    Information pertinent to this review objective was synthesized into a formulated Excel form, allowing a summary of each article’s information under various headings. The information extracted includes the corresponding author name, year of publication, country, journal, aim of the paper, sample characteristics, ie, demographic data, settings, patients, design, virtual reality system used, description of the system, measures, instrument, method of data collection and analysis, result, and main findings (Appendix 2).

    Moreover, the findings of the synthesis indicate that there has been a growing interest in the integration of virtual reality (VR) technology into breathing exercise program in recent years. As shown in Figure 2, there has been an increase in research in this domain.

    Figure 2 Article distribution by year.

    The publications included in the study came from five distinct countries, with the United States and Brazil emerging as the major contributors. Each of these countries provided two articles, making them the most significant contributors among the eight papers analyzed. Similarly, the Journal of Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback exhibited the greatest quantity of publications, whereas the remaining articles were published in the Asian Journal of Nursing, Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Personalized Medicine, Journal of Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Journal of Medical Internet Research, and Journal of BMC Psychiatry.

    Multiple convenient sample sizes were utilized, with an average sample size of 42 and a total sample size of 296. The sample population consists of individuals of both male and female genders, with a median age range spanning from 21.6 to 63.4 years. The individuals involved in the research were categorized as either in-patients or out-patients across the several investigations. The research involved patients or participants who shown a need to enhance their breathing functionality. All participants were randomly assigned to receive the VR-based intervention, and this assignment was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical consent procedures.

    Narrative Synthesis

    The study conducted by Kang et al39 in 2020 is the initial study included in the analysis, achieving a quality assessment score of 80%. The research utilized virtual reality technology to create an innovative breathing exercise solution that does not require contact with the mouth. Additionally, the study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of this exercise technique. The proposed system is a virtual reality-based breathing exercise system, referred to as VR-BRES. The developers have integrated gaming features and a soft stretch sensor into their virtual reality-based self-regulatory biofeedback breathing workout system. The study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of the system in comparison to the standard deep breathing (CDB) exercise. A total of 50 healthy participants (23 males and 27 females) with an average age of 42.52 ± 15.76 years were included in the analysis. The study involved individuals who were admitted as inpatients. Various respiratory parameters, such as forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), were assessed using a portable spirometry device called Pony FX (COSMED, USA). The utilization of the Virtual Reality-based Breathing Rehabilitation System (VR-BRES) yielded notable improvements in the parameters during the breathing rehabilitation program. Significantly, the outcomes of participants’ evaluations indicate that, in comparison to the standard deep breathing CDB exercise system, users regarded the breathing exercise with VR-BRES as more engaging, effective, and with a higher intention to utilize. Despite the lack of major differences in convenience across the various exercise approaches, However, the findings of the study indicate that virtual reality can serve as an effective training system for the purpose of respiratory rehabilitation.

    Blum et al study20 assessed the feasibility of utilizing a virtual reality exercise system for diaphragmatic breathing with the incorporation of biofeedback algorithms. The VR-based system also employs a respiratory biofeedback method. To assess the effectiveness of this system, a total of 72 participants, with a majority of 56 females and 16 males, were randomly assigned to engage in a brief VR-based breathing exercise. The average age of the participants was 21.6 years. The study involved a group of outpatients, and the variables assessed included participants’ post-exercise experience, subjective breath awareness after exercising, respiratory-induced abdomen motions during the exercise, and heart rate variability throughout the exercise. These measurements were obtained using the Oculus Rift CV1. In comparison to a control group engaging in focused breathing exercises, the findings of the study suggest that a VR-based breathing exercise system, when integrated with biofeedback, enhances respiratory sinus arrhythmias with a particular emphasis on slow diaphragmatic breathing. Similarly, enhancing breathing awareness and achieving an elevated level of user satisfaction.

    The study conducted by Betka et al40 focused on leveraging VR as a potential solution for addressing the issue of persistent dyspnea, often known as shortness of breath, among individuals in the recovery phase of COVID-19. The VR-based breathing workout system was utilized to construct a visual respiratory feedback function. The randomized experiment included a cohort of 26 participants, the majority of whom were male, with a median age of 55. The study involved individuals who were admitted as inpatients. The respiratory rate and respiratory rate variability were assessed as progression indicators of pulmonary rehabilitation. These parameters were recorded using the Go Direct® Respiration Belt, manufactured by Vernier, Beaverton, OR, USA. The intervention group was provided with synchronous feedback regarding their breathing, while the control group received asynchronous feedback. The assessment of the results was conducted using a combination of breathing recordings and questionnaires. The results of the trials suggest that the implementation of the Individual VR exercise system led to enhanced breathing comfort among participants in the intervention group, whereas no statistically significant improvements were observed in the control group. Although no negative effects were noted by the subjects, the research documented an increased level of user satisfaction and perception.

    Cruz and collaborators conducted a study41 in which various parameters were measured, including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE). These measurements were obtained utilizing the Epson PowerLite H309A and Xbox One Kinect devices. However, the study discovered that virtual reality-based therapy (VRBT) significantly enhances breathing rehabilitation by influencing various physiological parameters such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and rate of perceived exertion. These effects were observed during the execution of VRBT as well as during moments of rest and at 1, 3, and 5 minutes of recovery. The present study involved a cluster trail done at an outpatient rehabilitation center in Brazil, with a sample of 27 individuals with a mean age of 63.4 years.

    In a trial conducted by Ruzicky et al42 in which a pulmonary rehabilitation program, utilizing virtual reality technology to perform exercises, was provided to a group of 32 inpatient individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. The assessment included criteria such as breathing exercise tolerance and other factors. The findings from the trials indicate that the analysis of the initial data shown that a hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation program lasting for a duration of three weeks resulted in enhanced exercise tolerance among those affected by COVID-19. Additionally, this program was associated with a decrease in symptoms related to depression and anxiety.

    Rodrigues et al38 similarly examine the potential impact of VR on the experience of dyspnea, as well as other factors including pain symptom management, well-being perception, anxiety, and depression, in a sample of 44 hospitalized individuals with COVID-19. The average age of the participants is 48.9, and the distribution of samples is equal between genders. A novel biofeedback VR breathing exercise, incorporating gaming elements and a lens, was created for the purpose of assessing dyspnea as the major outcome. Additionally, the secondary outcomes of arterial hypertension, heart rate, respiratory rate, and SpO2 were also evaluated. Upon completion of the studies, it is evident that exercise therapy utilizing VR has a substantial impact on reducing symptoms of dyspnea as well as other measurable secondary outcomes.

    A previous investigation conducted by Russell et al43 centered on the utilization of virtual reality to facilitate paced diaphragmatic breathing (DB) training. The study involved a randomized trial of 60 female outpatients who were assigned to receive a treatment consisting of VR-based breathing exercises. The study examined many outcomes, including heart rate variability, breathing rate, and assessments of motion nausea. It is important to note that heart rate variability is a controversial outcome measure herein. Heart rate variability is often used as an indicator of autonomic nervous system activity, specifically reflecting the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic influences on heart rate. However, its interpretation as a direct measure of parasympathetic drive is subject to debate and caution. The study’s results indicate that the implementation of VR-based timed DB exercises leads to a notable enhancement in breathing functions and the activation of the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS). This activation of the PNS effectively mitigates physiological responses linked to motion sickness.

    In a study conducted by Shiban et al,44 the researchers examined the use of diaphragmatic breathing as a coping strategy in the context of virtual reality exposure therapy for aviophobia. The trial comprised a cohort of 29 individuals, with a significant majority being female. The measurement of both heart rate and respiration rate was conducted after the VR-exposure treatment. The findings indicate that the incorporation of VR technology into diaphragmatic breathing exercises yields enhancements in respiratory functions and aids in the alleviation of aviophobia.

    Discussion

    This research presents a scoping review that investigates the significance of integrating virtual reality exercise into breathing rehabilitation. Although different breathing techniques like mindful breathing, focused breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, and abdominal breathing are commonly used in clinical settings, there is a growing interest in exploring how emerging virtual reality technology could help with slow and controlled breathing, which could help with relaxation and improve respiratory functions.

    Based on the review of eight high-quality studies in this research, it is clear that VR technology has the potential to boost breathing function even more than traditional breathing exercises. This finding was corroborated by all of the trials included in the study. Of note, the majority of the reviewed papers relied on pilot studies or control studies as the basis for their research. Additionally, a subset of the papers focused solely on describing the design and development processes of their systems.

    Blum et al20 showed that a VR-based tool can work and be useful for encouraging slow diaphragmatic breathing through biofeedback of the respiratory system. The research conducted involved the development of a VR system for conducting breathing exercises. The study revealed how well a respiratory biofeedback method used in virtual reality could teach people how to control their breathing patterns and improve their overall respiratory health. It was quite interesting that the VR system developed in their paper facilitates the regulation of participants’ respiration through the utilization of visual stimuli. Showing each participant, a virtual representation of their chest cavity, wherein the color of the cavity changed in accordance with the depth of their breath further enhance participant breathing awareness. Upon the conclusion of multiple virtual reality training sessions, the participants acquired the ability to regulate their breathing patterns in a consistent and profound manner. This, however, facilitate the acquisition of improved breathing management skills, as a result of the biofeedback on their respiratory patterns. The findings of this study proved the feasibility and acceptability of utilizing VR for breathing rehabilitation and respiratory biofeedback.

    In contrast to different methods for breathing exercises, growing evidence and reports have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of the VR exercise system in enhancing breathing rehabilitation. This improvement is achieved through the utilization of the VR respiratory biofeedback technique, which not only offers participants an enjoyable and motivating experience but also provides them with valuable feedback on their breathing patterns. The observation of a notable rise in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) after the VR-based breathing exercise training indicates the presence of this phenomenon. The integration of respiratory biofeedback techniques into the VR system in Blum study may presents a promising avenue for breathing rehabilitation, offering potential benefits offering potential benefits for individuals seeking to enhance their breathing capabilities. It was further underlined by the study that the advantages of VR can also be taken into account for several respiratory disorders, such as cystic fibrosis, COPD, and asthma, which may benefit from the technology.The link between success and the swift growth of VR breathing techniques may be attributed to the provision of a very engaging and immersive workout experience. All of the evaluated research consistently placed focus on these features. One of the studies,39 compared the efficacy and usefulness of a VR breathing exercise system to conventional deep breathing exercises. The findings of their trial indicated that although individual variations in breathing function exist, the use of a VR-based exercise system resulted in a noteworthy enhancement of breathing parameters. In-addition, their user reviews indicated that these training routines are highly captivating, enjoyable, and high intention to use.

    Similar to Blum’s findings, the fact that biofeedback and self-regulation are part of the virtual reality exercise system may explain the success of the breathing exercise system. This finding aligns with assertions made by other scholars, as its distinctiveness correlates to the visualization of respiratory signals that offers respiratory feedback. This was also emphasized by Kang et al VR-based breathing exercise system,39 which provides biofeedback through breathing signal visualization, such as the avatar rabbit jump. The importance of this biofeedback was also underscored in a prior study, which demonstrated that women with limited thoracic movement experienced notable changes in respiratory parameters when incorporating visual feedback of diaphragmatic motion through ultrasound imaging into their VR breathing exercise regimen. Significantly, the transformation of the physical expansion of the chest or abdomen during inhalation into visual cues that are promptly relayed to the participants was effectively augment and engagement in breathing exercises was heightened.

    The integration of bio-respiratory visual feedback into virtual reality exercise can also be utilized in addressing dyspnea38,40. In line with the findings of these authors, the inclusion of visual-respiratory feedback or self-regulating biofeedback in VR interventions may enhance the breathing comfort of patients in the recovery phase of COVID-19 pneumonia, particularly those who are experiencing persistent dyspnea. Betka et al further confirmed these through their clinical experiment, including patients who are undergoing recovery from COVID-19 and are persistently affected by dyspnea.40 The authors posited that in cases where alternative respiratory treatments or interventions prove ineffective and potentially result in serious complications such as cognitive impairments, mental health disorders, and motor impairments, the implementation of a virtual reality-based breathing exercise intervention could yield substantial success in addressing the issue of persistent dyspnea. This observation aligns with the findings of the Rodrigues et al study, wherein a significant decrease in dyspnea and fatigue was seen among those affected by COVID-19 following VR-based exercise intervention.38

    Virtual reality breathing exercise intervention demonstrates a broader impact beyond its application to COVID-19 patients. This claim was similarly supported by a recent study which indicated that VR tool can also effectively reduce tiredness and dyspnea in obstructive pulmonary patients via administering virtual reality-based pulmonary rehabilitation.45

    Additionally, a recent randomized control study conducted in Saudi Arabia (42) focused on children with repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), who are known to continue living with chronic lung issues and demonstrate lower cardiorespiratory fitness compared to their healthy counterparts. Consequently, there is a risk of declining functional performance and physical ability in these children due to reduced cardiopulmonary fitness. However, the study highlighted that when VR-based exercises are combined with traditional physical therapy, these children with repaired CDH experienced more significant improvements in their pulmonary functions, cardiopulmonary capacity, functional performance, and quality of life compared to those who received traditional physical therapy alone46. However, without a detailed explanation of the underlying mechanism of action, it is challenging to fully understand how VR-based exercises contribute to these positive outcomes. The absence of a conceptualized framework in several studies limits our ability to contextualize and interpret the study findings within a theoretical framework.

    This growing evidence among adults and kids supports the assertion that a VR-based breathing exercise system can be considered as a potential alternative approach which is non-invasive and has no pharmacological features for promoting the rapid recuperation of patients.

    This scoping review founds VR breathing exercise therapy to be a promising tool in terms of patient satisfaction and the potential to alleviate the breathing issues and persistent dyspnea commonly observed in individuals recovering from severe conditions like Covid-19. Clinical improvements were observed in various aspects as a result of the VR biofeedback breathing intervention. Participants demonstrated noteworthy improvements in fatigue levels, and overall comfort during breathing exercises. Moreover, positive alterations were observed in vital signs, encompassing heart rate and other cardiopulmonary parameters as reported by Betka et al.

    To show how fast these rehabilitation techniques can be, limited exposure of people having breathing problems to short synchronous VR interventions incorporating visuo-respiratory features may improve breathing comfort. The uniqueness of the Immersive VR developed by Betka and associates and the VR-assisted therapeutic breathing exercise system developed by Rodrigues et al underscores the importance of cardiac or respiratory synchrony and self-regulating biofeedback.38,40 This synchrony creates a system that offers a better outcome. For example, the utilization of a “virtual body that is animated by the patient’s own respiratory movements”, a “complete duration of the breathing sequence”, and a comparable “three-dimensional virtual environment” contribute to enhanced involvement in breathing exercises.

    The provision of synchronous feedback has been found to significantly enhance the perception of control among patients with respect to their respiratory function, as reported in multiple studies20,39,40. Consequently, this heightened sense of control contributes to the enhancement of breathing self-regulation and awareness. Although the initial stage of Betka’s study did not show a statistically significant decrease in breathing discomfort, it did reveal a notable improvement in overall breathing comfort when utilizing synchronous visuo-respiratory stimulation. The insignificant initial phase result may be attributed to semantics or subjective discomfort ratings. This claim is consistent with the findings of a study conducted recently on the effects of a virtual reality-based breathing therapy on physiological responses in breathing rehabilitation.41 Specifically, their findings indicated that this therapy is effective in conditioning the participants during the execution phase. However, it was noted that elevated levels of respiratory rate and other cardiac parameters may be achieved during the recovery phase, and these effects can persist for up to 5 minutes. It is not surprising that such interventions can have an impact on various hemodynamic functions during the recovery phase, even up to a few minutes after the activity has ended. Nevertheless, the diverse effects observed in their virtual reality breathing therapy may be attributed to the differential levels of effort and intensity applied during the treatment. These, however, raise the importance of exercising caution throughout the administration of the virtual reality intervention, particularly in terms of closely monitoring the level of virtual reality exertion.

    Betka40 and Cruz41 successfully demonstrated the safety and cost-effectiveness of immersive VR-based digital therapeutics and virtual reality breathing therapy. They posited that VR-based interventions can be utilized as alternative cardiovascular interventions for individuals who are either in-patients or out-patients and are facing respiratory or breathing challenges. This tool can offer a supplementary approach for treatment and assessment, thereby reducing the potential for transmission and mitigating the established adverse effects linked to opioid therapy.

    Additionally, this scoping review identified exercise tolerance; a key indicator of cardiovascular endurance during breathing rehabilitation, and the implications of optimal lung function as another important area in which VR can be leveraged. This was supported by Ruzicky et al investigation on the importance of VR in enhancing exercise tolerance.42 They emphasize incorporation of VR-breathing exercise rehabilitation into COVID-19 rehabilitation therapy due to its numerous advantages in enhancing respiratory problems. Their three-week VR pulmonary rehabilitation program for COVID-19 inpatients demonstrated a noteworthy effect, as patients exhibited notable improvements in exercise tolerance subsequent to exposure to VR breathing exercise. While there was a gain in functional ability, the improvement in quality of life was not found to be significant, and no notable advantage over conventional treatments was noted. This observation is in contrast with the conclusions drawn by previous researchers, who discovered a notable and distinct advantage of VR breathing exercises over traditional rehabilitation interventions.

    The preliminary nature of the data analysis in the their study42 and brief duration of the VR exposure may be attributed to the insignificance findings. Therefore, possibly conducting a re-evaluation with a more extensive sample size over long period of exposure could potentially yield a positive outcome. Despite these findings, the author asserts, in alignment with prior research, that the integration of VR into breathing rehabilitation therapy presents a viable approach for mitigating the long-term consequences of COVID-19 and other respiratory ailments.

    This review synthesizes evidence suggesting that VR breathing exercise interventions have the potential to yield more favorable outcomes compared to conventional interventions. Specifically, these interventions can effectively promote increased awareness of patients’ breathing status and facilitate the maintenance of a balanced pulmonary function. Moreover, VR exercise tool’s ability to provide entertainment, engagement, and interactivity aligns with its distinct advantage over usual exercise methods that entail passive exercise participation. This, however, leads users to see exercise, typically seen as a highly demanding activity, as an enjoyable and immersive experience owing to its interactive characteristics.

    In comparison to traditional breathing exercise interventions, a study conducted by Russell et al demonstrated that the diaphragmatic breathing protocol resulted in a drop-in respiration rate, an increase in parasympathetic nervous system tone, and a reduction in the occurrence of motion sickness symptoms.43 The objective of activating the parasympathetic nervous system, as indicated by an increase in heart rate variability, was successfully accomplished, potentially resulting in the prevention of symptoms associated with motion sickness. Furthermore, these findings provide additional support for the assertion that the utilization of VR breathing exercises might effectively mitigate the progression of symptoms associated with motion sickness resulting from breathing control. The confluence of diaphragmatic breathing mechanisms and reduced respiratory rate suggests that these methods have the potential to enhance parasympathetic tone and provide a safeguard against motion sickness when individuals are exposed to stimuli that induce motion sickness. Despite concerns regarding potential risks associated with diaphragmatic breathing exposure during VR exercise therapy, evidence suggests that diaphragmatic breathing during VR intervention does not moderate negative outcomes.44 On the contrary, it has been found to enhance the effectiveness of VR breathing exercise rehabilitation and alleviate conditions such as aviophobia, which involves a fear of flying.

    Considering the long-term effects is crucial for understanding the true potential and effectiveness of VR-based exercise interventions in the context of respiratory conditions. Future studies should address this limitation by incorporating follow-up evaluations to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the treatment’s lasting impact.

    Limitation and Conclusion

    Limitation

    The heterogeneous nature of the VR system and the biofeedback mechanisms and techniques employed by the different included studies may be considered the main limitations of this scoping review. Since the primary objective of each respective study varies, the outcome may vary with studies. Limited numbers of trials may also be a potential limitation, as it is difficult to conclude with limited evidence. Nonetheless, the scoping review of eight quality studies in these current papers confirmed the significance of taking advantage of VR in breathing exercise rehabilitation.

    It is noteworthy that the findings of some reported studies exhibit variability due to factors such as constraints in experimental design methodology, inadequate availability of objective measurable breathing outcomes, and limited sample sizes. We encourage readers to conduct a more critical appraisal of the article/topic(s) of interest to form an independent and informed judgment regarding the effectiveness and implications of breath training with/without the VR in the context of their specific clinical population.

    Conclusion

    The effectiveness and rapid growth of VR breathing techniques are attributed to their engaging and immersive experience. The integration of biofeedback and self-regulation in VR exercise systems was also found to contribute to the significant outcome of the breathing exercise system. This is because the use of visual feedback in VR breathing exercises enhances user interest in breathing exercises.

    In addition, this scoping review highlights the effectiveness of VR exercise in improving dyspnea, a breathing condition. The unique aspect of VR-assisted breathing exercise systems lies in their emphasis on cardiac or respiratory synchrony and self-regulating biofeedback. The inclusion of a “virtual body animated by the patient’s own breathing” and a 3D virtual environment enhances engagement, self-regulation, and awareness during breathing exercises. However, the review also indicates that the outcomes of VR rehabilitation can vary depending on the effort and intensity exerted. Therefore, careful monitoring of VR effort intensity is necessary. Overall, VR breathing exercises are considered safe and cost-friendly rehabilitation tools for both in-patients and out-patients with respiratory difficulties.

    Additionally, the paper suggests that VR breathing exercise interventions offer preventive measures against the prolonged effects of conditions such as COVID-19 and other respiratory conditions. These interventions motivate patients to be mindful of their breathing condition and maintain balanced pulmonary function. The entertaining, engaging, and interactive nature of VR exercise therapy adds a fun and immersive element to the overall exercise experience for users.

    Abbreviations

    COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CDH, congenital diaphragmatic hernia; DB, diaphragmatic breathing; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; HIIT, high-intensity interval training; JBI, Jonna Briggs Institute; VR, virtual reality; VRBT, virtual reality-based therapy; PNS, parasympathetic nervous system; PR, Pulmonary rehabilitation.

    Acknowledgments

    The author would like to thank the College of Applied Medical Sciences Research Center and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University.

    Disclosure

    The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

    References

    1. Pleil JD, Ariel Geer Wallace M, Davis MD, Matty CM. The physics of human breathing: flow, timing, volume, and pressure parameters for normal, on-demand, and ventilator respiration. J Breath Res. 2021;15(4):042002. doi:10.1088/1752-7163/ac2589

    2. Nelson N. Diaphragmatic breathing: the foundation of core stability. Strength Conditioning J. 2012;34(5):34–40. doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e31826ddc07

    3. Pawaria S. Breathing- mechanism of breathing, muscles of respiration, breathing pattern and breathing exercises. In: DrTM A, editor. Emerging Trends in Disease and Health Research Vol. 6. Book Publisher International (a Part of SCIENCEDOMAIN International). 2022:128–141. doi:10.9734/bpi/etdhr/v6/15350D

    4. Lu HB, Ma RC, Yin YY, Song CY, Yang TT, Xie J. Clinical indicators of effects of yoga breathing exercises on patients with lung cancer after surgical resection: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs. 2023. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000001208

    5. Kader M, Hossain M, Reddy V, Perera NKP, Rashid M. Effects of short-term breathing exercises on respiratory recovery in patients with COVID-19: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022;14(1):60. doi:10.1186/s13102-022-00451-z

    6. Gerage AM, Alberton CL, Cucato GG, Delevatti RS, Ritti-Dias RM. Editorial: exercise intervention for prevention and management of hypertension. Front Physiol. 2023;14:1244715. doi:10.3389/fphys.2023.1244715

    7. Hopper SI, Murray SL, Ferrara LR, Singleton JK. Effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing for reducing physiological and psychological stress in adults: a quantitative systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2019;17(9):1855–1876. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003848

    8. Cai Y, Ren X, Wang J, Ma B, Chen O. Effects of breathing exercises in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;S0003999323002836. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.014

    9. Martins A, Arienzo A. Experiences and preferences of persons with asthma regarding breathing exercises are more related to wellness than to healthcare. Pneumologie. 2023;77(S 01):Po–436. doi:10.1055/s-0043-1761127

    10. Hussein EE, Taha NM. Effect of breathing exercises on quality of recovery among postoperative patients. Int J Stud Nurs. 2018;3(3):151. doi:10.20849/ijsn.v3i3.525

    11. Gholamrezaei A, Van Diest I, Aziz Q, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Oudenhove L. Psychophysiological responses to various slow, deep breathing techniques. Psychophysiology. 2021;58(2):e13712. doi:10.1111/psyp.13712

    12. Apriliana D, Suradi S, Setijadi AR. Role of incentive spirometry on exercise capacity, breathing symptoms, depression rate, and quality of life in NSCLC patients with chemotherapy. Respir Sci. 2021;2(1):8–17. doi:10.36497/respirsci.v2i1.33

    13. Suharti A, Rachmawati Nur Hidayati E, Yusviani HA. Comparative effect of incentive spirometry and diaphragm breathing to functional capacity in COVID-19 patient in an isolated ward. Bali Med J. 2022;11(3):1415–1419. doi:10.15562/bmj.v11i3.3579

    14. Wang YQ, Cao HP, Liu X, et al. Effect of breathing exercises in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving surgical treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Integr Med. 2020;38:101175. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101175

    15. Arden-Close E, Teasdale E, Tonkin-Crine S, et al. Patients’ perceptions of the potential of breathing training for asthma: a qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J. 2013;22(4):449–453. doi:10.4104/pcrj.2013.00092

    16. Morrow B, Brink J, Grace S, Pritchard L, Lupton-Smith A. The effect of positioning and diaphragmatic breathing exercises on respiratory muscle activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. South Afr J Physiother. 2016;72(1):6. doi:10.4102/sajp.v72i1.315

    17. Lee K, Choo Y-KI. Inspiratory muscle strengthening training method to improve respiratory function: comparison of the effects of diaphragmatic breathing with upper arm exercise and power-breathe breathing. J Korean Soc Integr Med. 2021;9(3):201–211. doi:10.32625/KJEI.2021.24.201

    18. Yang Y, Wei L, Wang S, et al. The effects of pursed lip breathing combined with diaphragmatic breathing on pulmonary function and exercise capacity in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;38(7):847–857. doi:10.1080/09593985.2020.1805834

    19. Kotta PA, Ali JM. Incentive spirometry for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery. Respir Care. 2021;66(2):327–333. doi:10.4187/respcare.07972

    20. Blum J, Rockstroh C, Göritz AS. Development and pilot test of a virtual reality respiratory biofeedback approach. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020;45(3):153–163. doi:10.1007/s10484-020-09468-x

    21. Kouijzer MMTE, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Kelders SM. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun. 2023;4(1):67. doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2

    22. Miner N. Stairway to Heaven: Breathing Mindfulness into Virtual Reality. Northeastern University; 2022. doi:10.17760/D20471083

    23. Li S, Zheng H, Ge Y, Yuan W, Han T Designing mindfulness practice system based on biofeedback in VR environment. In: Volume 2: 42nd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE). American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2022:V002T02A090. doi:10.1115/DETC2022-91254.

    24. Subramanian SK. Virtual reality in rehabilitation—using technology to enhance function. Pm&r. 2018;10(11):1221–1222. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.11.001

    25. Li BJ, Peña J, Jung Y. Editorial: VR/AR and wellbeing: the use of immersive technologies in promoting health outcomes. Front Virtual Real. 2023;3:1119919. doi:10.3389/frvir.2022.1119919

    26. Dar S, Ekart A, Bernardet U The virtual human breathing coach. In: 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE; 2022:434–436. doi:10.1109/VRW55335.2022.00095.

    27. Freeman D, Reeve S, Robinson A, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment, understanding, and treatment of mental health disorders. Psychol Med. 2017;47(14):2393–2400. doi:10.1017/S003329171700040X

    28. Pancini E, Anna FDN, Villani D. Breathing in virtual reality for promoting mental health: a scoping review. Preprint. 2023;1–43.

    29. Hoeg ER, Bruun-Pedersen JR, Serafin S Virtual reality-based high-intensity interval training for pulmonary rehabilitation: a feasibility and acceptability study. In: 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE; 2021:242–249. doi:10.1109/VRW52623.2021.00052.

    30. Cook NE, Huebschmann NA, Iverson GL. Safety and tolerability of an innovative virtual reality-based deep breathing exercise in concussion rehabilitation: a pilot study. Dev Neuro Rehabil. 2021;24(4):222–229. doi:10.1080/17518423.2020.1839981

    31. Snyder A, Sheridan C, Tanner A, et al. Cardiorespiratory functioning in youth with persistent post-concussion symptoms: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):561. doi:10.3390/jcm10040561

    32. Condon C, Lam WT, Mosley C, Gough S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of virtual reality as an exercise intervention for individuals with a respiratory condition. Adv Simul. 2020;5(1):33. doi:10.1186/s41077-020-00151-z

    33. Lan KC, Li CW, Cheung Y. Slow breathing exercise with multimodal virtual reality: a feasibility study. Sensors. 2021;21(16):5462. doi:10.3390/s21165462

    34. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616

    35. Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Health. 2015;13(3):141–146. doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050

    36. Barker TH, Stone JC, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):494–506. doi:10.11124/JBIES-22-00430

    37. Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L. Chapter 3: systematic reviews of effectiveness. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020;3. doi:10.46658/JBIMES-20-04

    38. Rodrigues IM, Lima AG, Santos AED, et al. A single session of virtual reality improved tiredness, shortness of breath, anxiety, depression and well-being in hospitalized individuals with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. J Pers Med. 2022;12(5):829. doi:10.3390/jpm12050829

    39. Kang J, Hong J, Lee YH. Development and feasibility test of a mouth contactless breathing exercise solution using virtual reality: a randomized crossover trial. Asian Nurs Res. 2021;15(5):345–352. doi:10.1016/j.anr.2021.12.002

    40. Betka S, Kannape OA, Fasola J, et al. Virtual reality intervention alleviates dyspnoea in patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia. ERJ Open Res. 2023;9(6):00570–02022. doi:10.1183/23120541.00570-2022

    41. Alves Da Cruz MM, Ricci-Vitor AL, Bonini Borges GL, Fernanda Da Silva P, Ribeiro F, Marques Vanderlei LC. Acute hemodynamic effects of virtual reality–based therapy in patients of cardiovascular rehabilitation: a cluster randomized crossover trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(4):642–649. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.12.006

    42. Ruzicky E, Sramka M, Sramka M, et al. Providing prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of patients after COVID-19 using artificial intelligence. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2022;43(1):9–17.

    43. Russell MEB, Hoffman B, Stromberg S, Carlson CR. Use of controlled diaphragmatic breathing for the management of motion sickness in a virtual reality environment. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2014;39(3–4):269–277. doi:10.1007/s10484-014-9265-6

    44. Shiban Y, Diemer J, Müller J, Brütting-Schick J, Pauli P, Mühlberger A. Diaphragmatic breathing during virtual reality exposure therapy for aviophobia: functional coping strategy or avoidance behavior? A pilot study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):29. doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1181-2

    45. Jung T, Moorhouse N, Shi X, Amin MF. A virtual reality–supported intervention for pulmonary rehabilitation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e14178. doi:10.2196/14178

    46. Azab AR, Elnaggar RK, Abdelbasset WK, et al. Virtual reality-based exercises’ effects on pulmonary functions, cardiopulmonary capacity, functional performance, and quality of life in children with repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(14):6480–6488. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202307_33118

    Source link

    Can breathing exercises and ice baths make you a better, healthier version of yourself? Scientists have found there may be some benefits — but ultimately, the jury is still out.

    A new review of research focuses on the "Wim Hof method," a regimen of breath-holding and cold exposure promoted by Dutch athlete Wim Hof, nicknamed "The Iceman" for performing athletic feats in extremely cold temperatures. Hof's website describes this method as having myriad benefits, such as increased willpower; fat loss; a "fortified" immune response; "balanced" hormones; and reduced inflammation.

    Source link

    A Phase 3 clinical trial assessing the potential of triple-combination Breztri Aerosphere (budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate) to improve cardiopulmonary outcomes in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is opening at sites worldwide, AstraZeneca, which markets the inhaled therapy, announced.

    The THARROS study (NCT06283966) is expected to enroll up to 5,000 COPD patients, ages 40 to 80, with a risk of cardiopulmonary complications at more than 650 centers in the U.S., Canada, and countries in Europe, South America, and Asia.

    Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Breztri Aerosphere or to AstraZeneca’s dual-combination Bevespi Aerosphere (glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate) for up to three years.

    “Even moderate COPD exacerbations are associated with increased risks of further lung events, severe cardiovascular complications and have been shown to contribute to patients dying,” Sharon Barr, PhD, AstraZeneca’s executive vice president and head of BioPharmaceuticals R&D, said in a company press release.

    Recommended Reading

    A large bell with the word

    Breztri Aerosphere is an approved inhalation maintenance therapy for COPD

    Fernando Martinez, MD, the trial’s international coordinating investigator, said that “if positive, the THARROS trial will provide critical evidence about the potential of single inhaler, triple combination therapy to reduce severe cardiopulmonary events and further advance treatment goals in COPD.

    Eligible study patients include those considered at risk but “with no history of exacerbations,” Martinez said.

    COPD is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the lungs, in which the airways become blocked, causing such disease symptoms such as cough with mucus, wheezing, and shortness of breath. Some patients also experience exacerbations, or sudden episodes of symptom worsening, that may persist for several days.

    Breztri Aerosphere, formerly known as PT010, is a triple-combination inhaled therapy designed to alleviate symptoms and reduce exacerbation frequency. It contains glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate, both working to help to widen the airways, as well as the anti-inflammatory corticosteroid budesonide.

    Breztri Aerosphere was approved in the U.S. as a maintenance treatment for people with COPD in 2020. It is also approved for COPD in the European Union, China, and Japan.

    These regulatory decisions were based on data from two Phase 3 clinical trials: ETHOS (NCT02465567) and KRONOS (NCT02497001).

    The ETHOS study showed that Breztri Aerosphere significantly reduced the frequency of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations, compared with the dual-combination therapies Bevespi Aerosphere and Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol fumarate).

    The earlier KRONOS trial showed that about six months of treatment with Breztri Aerosphere reduced exacerbation frequency and improved lung function relative to the dual-combination maintenance therapies.

    In both trials, the triple combination treatment’s safety profile was similar to that of the dual-combination therapies used for comparison.

    Trial will assess cardiopulmonary outcomes in patients given Breztri Aerosphere

    AstraZeneca last year presented data from a real-world registry study, called EROS, showing that treatment with Breztri Aerosphere shortly after a moderate or severe COPD exacerbation can lower the risk of further such flares.

    In THARROS, the potential of Breztri Aerosphere to reduce severe cardiopulmonary events in COPD patients considered at cardiopulmonary risk will be evaluated using a novel combination measure of respiratory and heart-related, or cardiac, outcomes.

    Its primary goal is assessing the time to a first severe cardiac or COPD event over up to three years of treatment. Secondary coals include time to a first severe COPD exacerbation, severe cardiac event, or death from respiratory and cardiac causes, and the rate of moderate or severe COPD exacerbations. The study is expected to be completed in 2028.

    “The 2024 GOLD Report highlights the treatment effect of non-pharmacologic interventions and inhaled triple combination therapies on mortality. The Report calls for a more proactive therapeutic approach to improve outcomes in COPD,” said Martinez, who is the chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

    “Now THARROS is seeking to provide first-of-its-kind evidence to support a strategy of comprehensive cardiopulmonary risk reduction with a triple therapy,” said David Berg, MD, a physician in cardiovascular and critical care medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Massachusetts.

    Separate trial into Breztri Aerosphere and exercise endurance also enrolling

    The company also announced the start of dosing in the Phase 3 ATHLOS trial (NCT06067828), which is enrolling up to 180 COPD patients, ages 40-80, with shortness of breath during exercise despite treatment with an inhaled monotherapy or dual-combination maintenance therapy.

    Patients randomly are being assigned to either Breztri Aerosphere, Symbicort, or a placebo. The trial is assessing the treatment’s effect on integrated cardiopulmonary parameters, including lung hyperinflation (overinflated lungs) and exercise endurance, which are associated with health status and survival in people with COPD.

    The FDA issued a warning letter to AstraZeneca last year for making claims about Breztri Aerosphere’s effectiveness that it considered false or misleading, because they were not supported by clinical evidence. These include the therapy’s ability to reduce the risk of severe exacerbations as well as the risk of death from any cause.

    Source link

    Expanded savings programs build on company’s longstanding commitment to addressing barriers to access and affordability for patients

    AstraZeneca announced it will expand the savings programs for its entire US inhaled respiratory portfolio, helping eligible patients pay no more than $35 per month for their medicine.* Expanding the savings programs will help make its inhalers more affordable to the most vulnerable patients living with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including those who are uninsured and underinsured.

    Pascal Soriot, Chief Executive Officer, AstraZeneca, said: “AstraZeneca’s expanded savings programs build on our longstanding commitment to addressing barriers to access and affordability for patients living with respiratory diseases to ultimately help patients lead healthier lives. We remain dedicated to addressing the need for affordability of our medicines, but the system is complex and we cannot do it alone. It is critical that Congress bring together key stakeholders to help reform the healthcare system so patients can afford the medicines they need, not just today, but for the future.”

    Starting June 1, 2024, eligible patients will pay no more than $35 per month for all AstraZeneca US inhaled respiratory medicines, including:

    • AIRSUPRA® (albuterol and budesonide) 
    • BEVESPI AEROSPHERE® (glycopyrrolate and formoterol fumarate) Inhalation Aerosol  
    • BREZTRI AEROSPHERE® (budesonide, glycopyrrolate, and formoterol fumarate) Inhalation Aerosol 
    • SYMBICORT® (budesonide and formoterol fumarate dihydrate) Inhalation Aerosol 

    In addition, AstraZeneca substantially reduced the list price of SYMBICORT on January 1, 2024. The Company will continue to provide discounts and rebates off the list price to help patients afford its inhaled respiratory medicines.

    For more than 50 years, AstraZeneca has served respiratory patients by investing in the research and development of new drug-device combinations, as well as next-generation biologics and novel mechanisms to address the vast unmet needs of these chronic, often debilitating diseases. AstraZeneca remains dedicated to transforming patient outcomes, while ensuring access and affordability of our innovative medicines.

    *Terms and conditions apply. Government restrictions exclude people enrolled in federal government insurance programs from co-pay support.

    IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

    AIRSUPRA® (albuterol and budesonide)

    • Contraindications: Hypersensitivity to albuterol, budesonide, or to any of the excipients
    • Deterioration of Asthma: Asthma may deteriorate acutely over a period of hours or chronically over several days or longer. If the patient continues to experience symptoms after using AIRSUPRA or requires more doses of AIRSUPRA than usual, it may be a marker of destabilization of asthma and requires evaluation of the patient and their treatment regimen
    • Paradoxical Bronchospasm: AIRSUPRA can produce paradoxical bronchospasm, which may be life threatening. Discontinue AIRSUPRA immediately and institute alternative therapy if paradoxical bronchospasm occurs. It should be recognized that paradoxical bronchospasm, when associated with inhaled formulations, frequently occurs with the first use of a new canister
    • Cardiovascular Effects: AIRSUPRA, like other drugs containing beta2-adrenergic agonists, can produce clinically significant cardiovascular effects in some patients, as measured by pulse rate, blood pressure, and/or other symptoms. If such effects occur, AIRSUPRA may need to be discontinued. In addition, beta-agonists have been reported to produce electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, such as flattening of the T wave, prolongation of the QTc interval, and ST-segment depression. Therefore, AIRSUPRA, like all sympathomimetic amines, should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders, especially coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertension
    • Do Not Exceed Recommended Dose: Clinically significant cardiovascular effects and fatalities have been reported in association with excessive use of inhaled sympathomimetic drugs
    • Hypersensitivity Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis: Can occur after administration of albuterol sulfate and budesonide, components of AIRSUPRA, as demonstrated by cases of anaphylaxis, angioedema, bronchospasm, oropharyngeal edema, rash, and urticaria. Discontinue AIRSUPRA if such reactions occur
    • Risk of Sympathomimetic Amines with Certain Coexisting Conditions: AIRSUPRA, like all therapies containing sympathomimetic amines, should be used with caution in patients with convulsive disorders, hyperthyroidism, or diabetes mellitus and in patients who are unusually responsive to sympathomimetic amines
    • Hypokalemia: Beta-adrenergic agonist medicines may produce significant hypokalemia in some patients. The decrease in serum potassium is usually transient, not requiring supplementation
    • Immunosuppression and Risk of Infections: Due to possible immunosuppression from the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), potential worsening of infections could occur. Use with caution. A more serious or fatal course of chickenpox or measles can occur in susceptible patients
    • Oropharyngeal Candidiasis: Has occurred in patients treated with ICS agents. Monitor patients periodically. Advise patients to rinse his/her mouth with water, if available, without swallowing after inhalation
    • Hypercorticism and Adrenal Suppression: May occur with very high doses in susceptible individuals. If such changes occur, consider appropriate therapy
    • Reduction in Bone Mineral Density: Decreases in bone mineral density have been observed with long-term administration of ICS. For patients at high risk for decreased bone mineral density, assess initially and periodically thereafter
    • Glaucoma and Cataracts: Have been reported following the long-term administration of ICS, including budesonide, a component of AIRSUPRA
    • Effects on Growth: Orally inhaled corticosteroids, including budesonide, may cause a reduction in growth velocity when administered to pediatric patients. The safety and effectiveness of AIRSUPRA have not been established in pediatric patients, and AIRSUPRA is not indicated for use in this population
    • Most common adverse reactions (incidence ≥ 1%) are headache, oral candidiasis, cough, and dysphonia
    • Drug Interactions: AIRSUPRA should be administered with caution to patients being treated with:
      • Strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (may cause systemic corticosteroid effects)
      • Short-acting bronchodilators (concomitant use of additional beta-agonists with AIRSUPRA should be used judiciously to prevent beta-agonist overdose)
      • Beta-blockers (may block pulmonary effects of beta-agonists and produce severe bronchospasm)
      • Diuretics or non-potassium-sparing diuretics (may potentiate hypokalemia or ECG changes). Consider monitoring potassium levels
      • Digoxin (may decrease serum digoxin levels). Consider monitoring digoxin levels
      • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) or tricyclic antidepressants (Use AIRSUPRA with extreme caution; may potentiate effect of albuterol on the cardiovascular system)
    • Use AIRSUPRA with caution in patients with hepatic impairment, as budesonide systemic exposure may increase. Monitor patients with hepatic disease

    Please see full Prescribing Information, including Patient Information.

    You may report side effects related to AstraZeneca products.

    BEVESPI AEROSPHERE® (glycopyrrolate and formoterol fumarate) Inhalation Aerosol

    CONTRAINDICATIONS

    All long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABAs), including formoterol fumarate, are contraindicated in patients with asthma without use of an inhaled corticosteroid. BEVESPI is not indicated for the treatment of asthma. BEVESPI is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to glycopyrrolate, formoterol fumarate, or to any component of the product.

    WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

    • The safety and efficacy of BEVESPI AEROSPHERE in patients with asthma have not been established. BEVESPI AEROSPHERE is not indicated for the treatment of asthma
    • Use of LABAs as monotherapy (without inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) for asthma is associated with an increased risk of asthma-related death. These findings are considered a class effect of LABA monotherapy. When LABAs are used in fixed-dose combination with ICS, data from large clinical trials do not show a significant increase in the risk of serious asthma-related events (hospitalizations, intubations, death) compared to ICS alone. Available data do not suggest an increased risk of death with use of LABAs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
    • BEVESPI should not be initiated in patients with acutely deteriorating COPD, which may be a life-threatening condition
    • BEVESPI should not be used for the relief of acute symptoms (ie, as rescue therapy for the treatment of acute episodes of bronchospasm). Acute symptoms should be treated with an inhaled short-acting beta2-agonist (SABA)
    • BEVESPI should not be used more often or at higher doses than recommended, or with other LABAs, as an overdose may result
    • If paradoxical bronchospasm occurs, discontinue BEVESPI immediately and institute alternative therapy
    • If immediate hypersensitivity reactions occur, in particular, angioedema, urticaria, or skin rash, discontinue BEVESPI at once and consider alternative treatment
    • BEVESPI can produce a clinically significant cardiovascular effect in some patients, as measured by increases in pulse rate, blood pressure, or symptoms. If such effects occur, BEVESPI may need to be discontinued
    • Use with caution in patients with convulsive disorders, thyrotoxicosis, diabetes mellitus, ketoacidosis, and in patients who are unusually responsive to sympathomimetic amines
    • Be alert to hypokalemia and hyperglycemia
    • Worsening of narrow-angle glaucoma or urinary retention may occur. Use with caution in patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, prostatic hyperplasia, or bladder-neck obstruction, and instruct patients to contact a physician immediately if symptoms occur

    ADVERSE REACTIONS

    The most common adverse reactions with BEVESPI (≥2% and more common than placebo) were cough, 4.0% (2.7%) and urinary tract infection, 2.6% (2.3%).

    DRUG INTERACTIONS

    • Use caution if administering additional adrenergic drugs because the sympathetic effects of formoterol may be potentiated
    • Concomitant treatment with xanthine derivatives, steroids, or diuretics may potentiate any hypokalemic effect of formoterol
    • Use with caution in patients taking non-potassium-sparing diuretics, as the ECG changes and/or hypokalemia may worsen with concomitant beta2-agonists
    • The action of adrenergic agonists on the cardiovascular system may be potentiated by monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, or other drugs known to prolong the QTc interval. Therefore, BEVESPI should be used with extreme caution in patients being treated with these agents
    • Use beta-blockers with caution as they not only block the therapeutic effects of beta-agonists, but may produce severe bronchospasm in patients with COPD
    • Avoid co-administration of BEVESPI with other anticholinergic-containing drugs as this may lead to an increase in anticholinergic adverse effects

    INDICATION

    BEVESPI AEROSPHERE is a combination of glycopyrrolate, an anticholinergic, and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist (LABA), indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema.

    LIMITATION OF USE

    Not indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm or for the treatment of asthma.

    Please read full Prescribing Information, including Patient Information.

    You may report side effects related to AstraZeneca products.

    BREZTRI AEROSPHERE® (budesonide, glycopyrrolate, and formoterol fumarate) Inhalation Aerosol

    • BREZTRI is contraindicated in patients who have a hypersensitivity to budesonide, glycopyrrolate, formoterol fumarate, or product excipients
    • BREZTRI is not indicated for treatment of asthma. Long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist (LABA) monotherapy for asthma is associated with an increased risk of asthma-related death. These findings are considered a class effect of LABA monotherapy. When a LABA is used in fixed-dose combination with ICS, data from large clinical trials do not show a significant increase in the risk of serious asthma-related events (hospitalizations, intubations, death) compared with ICS alone. Available data do not suggest an increased risk of death with use of LABA in patients with COPD
    • BREZTRI should not be initiated in patients with acutely deteriorating COPD, which may be a life-threatening condition
    • BREZTRI is NOT a rescue inhaler. Do NOT use to relieve acute symptoms; treat with an inhaled short-acting beta2-agonist
    • BREZTRI should not be used more often than recommended; at higher doses than recommended; or in combination with LABA-containing medicines, due to risk of overdose. Clinically significant cardiovascular effects and fatalities have been reported in association with excessive use of inhaled sympathomimetic drugs
    • Oropharyngeal candidiasis has occurred in patients treated with orally inhaled drug products containing budesonide. Advise patients to rinse their mouths with water without swallowing after inhalation
    • Lower respiratory tract infections, including pneumonia, have been reported following ICS. Physicians should remain vigilant for the possible development of pneumonia in patients with COPD as the clinical features of pneumonia and exacerbations frequently overlap
    • Due to possible immunosuppression, potential worsening of infections could occur. Use with caution. A more serious or fatal course of chickenpox or measles can occur in susceptible patients
    • Particular care is needed for patients transferred from systemic corticosteroids to ICS because deaths due to adrenal insufficiency have occurred in patients during and after transfer. Taper patients slowly from systemic corticosteroids if transferring to BREZTRI
    • Hypercorticism and adrenal suppression may occur with regular or very high dosage in susceptible individuals. If such changes occur, consider appropriate therapy
    • Caution should be exercised when considering the coadministration of BREZTRI with long-term ketoconazole and other known strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors. Adverse effects related to increased systemic exposure to budesonide may occur
    • If paradoxical bronchospasm occurs, discontinue BREZTRI immediately and institute alternative therapy
    • Anaphylaxis and other hypersensitivity reactions (eg, angioedema, urticaria or rash) have been reported. Discontinue and consider alternative therapy
    • Use caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders, especially coronary insufficiency, as formoterol fumarate can produce a clinically significant cardiovascular effect in some patients as measured by increases in pulse rate, systolic or diastolic blood pressure, and also cardiac arrhythmias, such as supraventricular tachycardia and extrasystoles
    • Decreases in bone mineral density have been observed with long-term administration of ICS. Assess initially and periodically thereafter in patients at high risk for decreased bone mineral content
    • Glaucoma and cataracts may occur with long-term use of ICS. Worsening of narrow-angle glaucoma may occur, so use with caution. Consider referral to an ophthalmologist in patients who develop ocular symptoms or use BREZTRI long term. Instruct patients to contact a healthcare provider immediately if symptoms occur
    • Worsening of urinary retention may occur. Use with caution in patients with prostatic hyperplasia or bladder-neck obstruction. Instruct patients to contact a healthcare provider immediately if symptoms occur
    • Use caution in patients with convulsive disorders, thyrotoxicosis, diabetes mellitus, and ketoacidosis or unusually responsive to sympathomimetic amines
    • Be alert to hypokalemia or hyperglycemia
    • Most common adverse reactions in a 52-week trial (incidence ≥ 2%) were upper respiratory tract infection (5.7%), pneumonia (4.6%), back pain (3.1%), oral candidiasis (3.0%), influenza (2.9%), muscle spasms (2.8%), urinary tract infection (2.7%), cough (2.7%), sinusitis (2.6%), and diarrhea (2.1%). In a 24-week trial, adverse reactions (incidence ≥ 2%) were dysphonia (3.3%) and muscle spasms (3.3%)
    • BREZTRI should be administered with extreme caution to patients being treated with monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants, as these may potentiate the effect of formoterol fumarate on the cardiovascular system
    • BREZTRI should be administered with caution to patients being treated with:
      • Strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors (may cause systemic corticosteroid effects)
      • Adrenergic drugs (may potentiate effects of formoterol fumarate)
      • Xanthine derivatives, steroids, or non-potassium sparing diuretics (may potentiate hypokalemia and/or ECG changes)
      • Beta-blockers (may block bronchodilatory effects of beta-agonists and produce severe bronchospasm)
      • Anticholinergic-containing drugs (may interact additively). Avoid use with BREZTRI
    • Use BREZTRI with caution in patients with hepatic impairment, as budesonide and formoterol fumarate systemic exposure may increase. Patients with severe hepatic disease should be closely monitored

    INDICATION

    BREZTRI AEROSPHERE is indicated for the maintenance treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

    LIMITATIONS OF USE

    Not indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm or for the treatment of asthma.

    Please see full BREZTRI Prescribing Information, including Patient Information.

    You may report side effects related to AstraZeneca products.

    SYMBICORT® (budesonide and formoterol fumarate dihydrate) Inhalation Aerosol

    • Use of long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABA) as monotherapy (without inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) for asthma is associated with an increased risk of asthma-related death. Available data from controlled clinical trials also suggest that use of LABA as monotherapy increases the risk of asthma-related hospitalization in pediatric and adolescent patients. These findings are considered a class effect of LABA. When LABA are used in fixed dose combination with ICS, data from large clinical trials do not show a significant increase in the risk of serious asthma-related events (hospitalizations, intubations, death) compared to ICS alone
    • SYMBICORT is NOT a rescue medication and does NOT replace fast-acting inhalers to treat acute symptoms
    • SYMBICORT should not be initiated in patients during rapidly deteriorating episodes of asthma or COPD
    • Patients who are receiving SYMBICORT should not use additional formoterol or other LABA for any reason
    • Localized infections of the mouth and pharynx with Candida albicans has occurred in patients treated with SYMBICORT. Patients should rinse the mouth after inhalation of SYMBICORT
    • Lower respiratory tract infections, including pneumonia, have been reported following the administration of ICS
    • Due to possible immunosuppression, potential worsening of infections could occur. A more serious or even fatal course of chickenpox or measles can occur in susceptible patients
    • It is possible that systemic corticosteroid effects such as hypercorticism and adrenal suppression may occur, particularly at higher doses. Particular care is needed for patients who are transferred from systemically active corticosteroids to ICS. Deaths due to adrenal insufficiency have occurred in asthmatic patients during and after transfer from systemic corticosteroids to less systemically available ICS
    • Caution should be exercised when considering administration of SYMBICORT in patients on long-term ketoconazole and other known potent CYP3A4 inhibitors
    • As with other inhaled medications, paradoxical bronchospasm may occur with SYMBICORT
    • Immediate hypersensitivity reactions may occur, as demonstrated by cases of urticaria, angioedema, rash, and bronchospasm
    • Excessive beta-adrenergic stimulation has been associated with central nervous system and cardiovascular effects. SYMBICORT should be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular disorders, especially coronary insufficiency, cardiac arrhythmias, and hypertension
    • Long-term use of ICS may result in a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD). Since patients with COPD often have multiple risk factors for reduced BMD, assessment of BMD is recommended prior to initiating SYMBICORT and periodically thereafter
    • ICS may result in a reduction in growth velocity when administered to pediatric patients
    • Glaucoma, increased intraocular pressure, and cataracts have been reported following the administration of ICS, including budesonide, a component of SYMBICORT. Close monitoring is warranted in patients with a change in vision or history of increased intraocular pressure, glaucoma, or cataracts
    • In rare cases, patients on ICS may present with systemic eosinophilic conditions
    • SYMBICORT should be used with caution in patients with convulsive disorders, thyrotoxicosis, diabetes mellitus, ketoacidosis, and in patients who are unusually responsive to sympathomimetic amines
    • Beta-adrenergic agonist medications may produce hypokalemia and hyperglycemia in some patients
    • The most common adverse reactions ≥3% reported in asthma clinical trials included nasopharyngitis, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngolaryngeal pain, sinusitis, pharyngitis, rhinitis, influenza, back pain, nasal congestion, stomach discomfort, vomiting, and oral candidiasis
    • The most common adverse reactions ≥3% reported in COPD clinical trials included nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, bronchitis, sinusitis, and upper respiratory tract infection
    • SYMBICORT should be administered with caution to patients being treated with MAO inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants, or within 2 weeks of discontinuation of such agents
    • Beta-blockers may not only block the pulmonary effect of beta-agonists, such as formoterol, but may produce severe bronchospasm in patients with asthma
    • ECG changes and/or hypokalemia associated with nonpotassium-sparing diuretics may worsen with concomitant beta-agonists. Use caution with the coadministration of SYMBICORT

    INDICATIONS

    • SYMBICORT is indicated for the treatment of asthma in patients 6 years and older not adequately controlled on a long-term asthma-control medication such as an ICS or whose disease warrants initiation of treatment with both an ICS and LABA (also see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
    • SYMBICORT 160/4.5 is indicated for the maintenance treatment of airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including chronic bronchitis and/or emphysema, and to reduce COPD exacerbations.
    • SYMBICORT is NOT indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm.

    Please see full Prescribing Information, including Patient Information.

    You may report side effects related to AstraZeneca products.

    Notes

    About Asthma

    Asthma is a chronic, inflammatory respiratory disease with variable symptoms that affects as many as 262 million people worldwide,1 including approximately 25 million in the US.2

    Patients with asthma experience recurrent breathlessness and wheezing, which varies over time, and in severity and frequency.3 These patients are at risk of severe exacerbations regardless of their disease severity, adherence to treatment or level of control.4-5

    There are an estimated 136 million asthma exacerbations globally per year,6 including approximately 10 million in the US2; these are physically threatening and emotionally significant for many patients7 and can be fatal.3,8

    Inflammation is central to both asthma symptoms4 and exacerbations.9 Many patients experiencing asthma symptoms use a SABA (e.g., albuterol) as a rescue medicine10-12; however, taking a SABA alone does not address inflammation, leaving patients at risk of severe exacerbations,13 which can result in impaired quality of life,14 hospitalization15 and frequent oral corticosteroid (OCS) use.15 Treatment of exacerbations with as few as 1-3 short courses of OCS are associated with an increased risk of adverse health conditions including type 2 diabetes, depression/anxiety, renal impairment, cataracts, cardiovascular disease, pneumonia and fracture.16 International recommendations from the GINA no longer recommend SABA alone as the preferred rescue therapy.3

    About COPD

    COPD refers to a group of lung diseases, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema, that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems.17 Affecting an estimated 16 million Americans, COPD is the third leading cause of death due to chronic disease and the sixth overall leading cause of death in the US.18-19

    About AIRSUPRA®

    AIRSUPRA (albuterol and budesonide), formerly known as PT027, is a first-in-class SABA/ICS rescue treatment for asthma in the US, to be taken as needed. It is an inhaled, fixed-dose combination rescue medication containing albuterol (also known as salbutamol), a SABA, and budesonide, a corticosteroid, and has been developed in a pMDI using AstraZeneca’s Aerosphere delivery technology.

    The FDA approval of AIRSUPRA was based on MANDALA and DENALI Phase III trials (Approval press release). In MANDALA, AIRSUPRA significantly reduced the risk of severe exacerbations compared to albuterol in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma when used as an as-needed rescue medication in response to symptoms. For patients treated with AIRSUPRA 180 mcg/160 mcg the annualized total systemic corticosteroids dose when compared with albuterol 180 mcg was statistically significantly different, with a reduction in mean annualized dose of 40 mg per patient. In DENALI, AIRSUPRA significantly improved lung function compared to the individual components albuterol and budesonide in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

    About BEVESPI AEROSPHERE®

    BEVESPI AEROSPHERE (glycopyrronium and formoterol fumarate) is a fixed-dose dual bronchodilator in a pMDI, combining glycopyrronium, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), and formoterol fumarate, a long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA). PMDIs are an important choice for COPD patients where limited lung function, advanced age and reduced dexterity or cognition are significant considerations for patients to achieve therapeutic benefits from their medicines. BEVESPI AEROSPHERE is the only LABA/LAMA with Aerosphere delivery technology. Results from an imaging trial have shown that BEVESPI AEROSPHERE effectively delivers medicine to both the large and small airways.

    About BREZTRI AEROSPHERE®

    BREZTRI AEROSPHERE (budesonide, glycopyrrolate, and formoterol fumarate) is a single-inhaler, fixed-dose triple-combination of formoterol fumarate, a LABA, glycopyrronium bromide, a LAMA, with budesonide, an ICS, and delivered in a pressurized metered-dose inhaler. BREZTRI AEROSPHERE is approved to treat COPD in more than 50 countries worldwide including the US, EU, China and Japan, and is currently being studied in Phase III trials for asthma.

    About SYMBICORT®

    Symbicort (budesonide and formoterol fumarate dihydrate) is the number one ICS/LABA combination therapy in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China. It is a combination formulation containing budesonide, an ICS that treats underlying inflammation, and formoterol, a LABA with a fast onset of action, in a single inhaler. Symbicort was launched in 2000 and is approved in approximately 120 countries to treat asthma and/or COPD either as Symbicort Turbuhaler or Symbicort pMDI (pressurised metered-dose inhaler).

    About AstraZeneca in Respiratory & Immunology

    Respiratory & Immunology, part of BioPharmaceuticals, is one of AstraZeneca’s main disease areas and is a key growth driver for the Company. 

    AstraZeneca is an established leader in respiratory care with a 50-year heritage. The Company aims to transform the treatment of asthma and COPD by focusing on earlier biology-led treatment, eliminating preventable asthma attacks, and removing COPD as a top-three leading cause of death. The Company’s early respiratory research is focused on emerging science involving immune mechanisms, lung damage and abnormal cell-repair processes in disease and neuronal dysfunction. 

    With common pathways and underlying disease drivers across respiratory and immunology, AstraZeneca is following the science from chronic lung diseases to immunology-driven disease areas. The Company’s growing presence in immunology is focused on five mid- to late-stage franchises with multi-disease potential, in areas including rheumatology (including systemic lupus erythematosus), dermatology, gastroenterology, and systemic eosinophilic-driven diseases. AstraZeneca’s ambition in Respiratory & Immunology is to achieve disease modification and durable remission for millions of patients worldwide. 

    AstraZeneca

    AstraZeneca is a global, science-led biopharmaceutical company that focuses on the discovery, development, and commercialization of prescription medicines in Oncology, Rare Diseases, and BioPharmaceuticals, including Cardiovascular, Renal & Metabolism, and Respiratory & Immunology. Based in Cambridge, UK, AstraZeneca operates in over 100 countries and its innovative medicines are used by millions of patients worldwide. Please visit  www.astrazeneca-us.com and follow us on social media @AstraZeneca.

    About AZ&Me™

    AstraZeneca’s patient assistance program, AZ&Me Prescription Savings Program (AZ&Me), is part of the Company’s commitment to addressing barriers to access and affordability to improve medication adherence, enhance patient care, and help patients lead healthier lives.  AZ&Me is just one of the ways that AstraZeneca makes its life-changing medicines widely available, accessible, and affordable.

    For over 40 years, AstraZeneca has offered a patient assistance program through AZ&Me and prior legacy free drug programs, making it one of the longest standing patient assistance programs in the country.  Since 2007, over five million people have benefited from this program.  In addition to its patient assistance programs, AstraZeneca offers other affordability programs and resources to help increase patients’ access to medicines and reduce their out-of-pocket costs including a co-pay savings program for commercially-insured patients and additional affordability resources.  Each of these programs offer financial support to particular patient populations, consistent with applicable legal requirements.

    The goal of AZ&Me is to help patients who have been prescribed an AstraZeneca medication and are having difficulty affording it. Patients enrolled in AZ&Me receive their AstraZeneca medicine for free. To learn more, visit AZ&Me.com.

    Contacts

    Brendan McEvoy        +1 302 885 2677
    Jillian Gonzales          +1 302 885 2677       

    US Media Mailbox: [email protected]

    ###

    References

    1. The Global Asthma Report 2022. Accessed: March 2024.  globalasthmareport.org/index.html
    2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Most Recent National Asthma Data. Accessed: March 2024.  www.cdc.gov/asthma/most_recent_national_asthma_data.htm
    3. Global Initiative for Asthma. Updated May 2023. Accessed: March 2024. www.ginasthma.org
    4. Price D, et al. Asthma control and management in 8,000 European patients: the REcognise Asthma and LInk to Symptoms and Experience (REALISE) survey. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014;24:14009.
    5. Papi A, et al. Relationship of inhaled corticosteroid adherence to asthma exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6): 1989-1998.e3.
    6. Data on File. REF-173201. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP.
    7. Sastre J, et al. Insights, attitudes, and perceptions about asthma and its treatment: a multinational survey of patients from Europe and Canada. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:13.
    8. Fernandes AG, et al. Risk factors for death in patients with severe asthma. J Bras Pneumol. 2014;40(4):364-372.
    9. Wark PA, et al. Asthma exacerbations. 3: Pathogenesis. Thorax. 2006;61(10):909-915.
    10. Johnson DB, et al. Albuterol. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan 10.
    11. Montemayor T, et al. Albuterol: Often Used and Heavily Abused. Respiratory Care. November 2021, 66 (Suppl 10) 3603775.
    12. ClinCalc.com. Albuterol Drug Usage Statistics, United States, 2013-2020. Accessed: March 2024. clincalc.com/DrugStats/Drugs/Albuterol
    13. Nwaru BI, et al. Overuse of short-acting β2-agonists in asthma is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and mortality: a nationwide cohort study of the global SABINA programme. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(4):1901872.
    14. Lloyd A, et al. The impact of asthma exacerbations on health-related quality of life in moderate to severe asthma patients in the UK. Prim Care Respir J. 2007;16(1):22-27.
    15. Bourdin A, et al. ERS/EAACI statement on severe exacerbations in asthma in adults: facts, priorities and key research questions. Eur Respir J. 2019;54(3):1900900.
    16. Price DB, et al. Adverse outcomes from initiation of systemic corticosteroids for asthma: long-term observational study. J Asthma Allergy. 2018;11:193-204.
    17. GOLD. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2024. [Online]. Accessed: March 2024. goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/
    18. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. What is COPD? Accessed: March 2024. www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/copd
    19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading Causes of Death. Accessed: March 2024. www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm

    Source link

    Medical life-saving techniques include mechanical ventilation. During the COVID-19 epidemic, the lack of inexpensive, precise, and accessible mechanical ventilation equipment was the biggest challenge. The global need exploded, especially in developing nations. Global researchers and engineers are developing inexpensive, portable medical ventilators. A simpler mechanical ventilator system with a realistic lungs model is simulated in this work. A systematic ventilation study is done using the dynamic simulation of the model. Simulation findings of various medical disorders are compared to standard data. The maximum lung pressure (Pmax) was 15.78 cmH2O for healthy lungs, 17.72 for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, 16.05 for pneumonia, 19.74 for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 17.1 for AECOPD, 19.64 for asthma, and 15.09 for acute intracranial illnesses and head traumas. All were below 30 cmH2O, the average maximum pressure. The computed maximum tidal volume (TDVmax) is 0.5849 l, substantially lower than that of the healthy lungs (0.700 l). The pneumonia measurement was 0.4256 l, substantially lower than the typical 0.798 l. TDVmax was 0.3333 l for ARDS, lower than the usual 0.497 l. The computed TDVmax for AECOPD was 0.6084 l, lower than the normal 0.700 l. Asthma had a TDVmax of 0.4729 l, lower than the typical 0.798 l. In individuals with acute cerebral diseases and head traumas, TDVmax is 0.3511 l, lower than the typical 0.700 l. The results show the viability of the model as it performs accurately to the presented medical condition parameters. Further clinical trials are needed to assess the safety and reliability of the simulation model.

    Patients who are diagnosed with COVID-19 suffer from a major drop in blood oxygen saturation and face difficulty breathing. Mechanical ventilation is a crucial procedure for providing respiratory support to individuals facing inconveniences in breathing by assisting the breathing or controlling the respiration.1 In severe COVID-19 individuals, thromboembolic consequences, such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), have been observed. Lung illness can cause respiratory failure in many ways. Depending on immunity, COVID-19 might induce mild to severe breathing issues. The virus enters the human body through the nose, mouth, and eyes. COVID-19 causes bilateral pneumonia. Fluid in the lungs limits oxygen intake and causes shortness of breath, which can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and sepsis. Mechanical ventilation can help with breathing problems.2 

    Modern hospital ventilators are highly functional and technologically advanced, but in resource-limited health systems, they are very expensive.3 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) caused by microcirculation thrombotic events promotes severe hypoxemia and multiple-organ dysfunction in patients with this disease.4 Mechanical ventilators are life support devices for patients in intensive care units (ICUs) who need assistance with ventilation diseases, trauma, congenital malformations, drug interactions, or surgical emergencies. However, the current need for respiratory mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19 outweighs the ability of health systems worldwide to obtain and deliver mechanical ventilators.5 

    Mechanical ventilation through modern mechanical ventilators is carried out in different modes. Modes of mechanical ventilation are widely discussed in Refs. 6 and 7. The present study is mainly focused on controlled modes, which can be divided into VCV (volume-controlled ventilation) and PCV (pressure-controlled ventilation). The most important advantage of minute-based ventilation is that it keeps the waveforms stable. VCV mode requires setting tidal volume, minute respiratory rate, inspiration-to-expiration (I/E) ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and FiO2. PCV mode requires setting PiO2, minute respiratory rate, I/E ratio, PEEP, and FiO2. A VCV breath is a tidal volume delivered to the lungs. After a set tidal volume, the ventilator cycles. Flow rate determines inspiratory time. Lung pressures—peak inspiratory pressures (PIPs) and end-inspiratory alveolar pressures—depend on respiratory system resistance, compliance, and tidal volume. Controlling tidal volume and minute ventilation is the main benefit of VC, but in cases of impaired respiratory system compliance, it may cause dangerously high airway pressures and barotrauma. PCV uses airway pressure to expand the lungs for a set time. The clinician sets the inspiratory pressure, while dynamic lung compliance and airway resistance determine the delivered tidal volume and flow rate. After an inspiratory time, the ventilator stops delivering pressure. Controlling lung pressure prevents barotrauma. In intubated patients with high respiratory drive, PCV may improve ventilator synchrony because inspiratory flow is not fixed. PCV’s inability to guarantee or limit tidal volume due to acute lung compliance changes is a major drawback.8 

    In this uncertain situation, many researchers and engineers are actively participating to design a ventilator that can be produced by any suitable manufacturing facility. A plastic air tank, two wooden or plastic circles, a bendable wire, two check valves, a DC motor, and a guide cylinder were used in El Majid et al.’s9 design. The motor bends the wire and pulls the bottom circle up, squeezing the tank’s air. Through the check valve, the compressed air enters pipes. This is the inspiration stage of breathing. Since the patient’s lungs have a higher pressure than the air tank, the device will draw air from them. This is the expiration state. Low-cost embedded boards, such as Arduinos or ESP32s, will control the components. Although still in development, this concept offers a promising and affordable alternative to mechanical ventilation.

    The RapidVent group and Northwell Health have figured out a way to transform a non-invasive BiPAP machine into an invasive ventilator for COVID patients.10 The researchers also invented a low-cost Brazilian emergency mechanical ventilator called 10D-EMV.11 The simulation model in this study was inspired by “Manshema,” a doctor-scientist-developed emergency ventilation machine. The model was based on MathWorks® “Medical Ventilator with Lung Model” and altered to classify the mechanical ventilator design, control method, and autonomously breathing patients. The Manshema Ventilator helps autonomously breathing patients maintain PEEP and blood oxygen saturation.12 A compact mechanical ventilator was created by automating bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation. Those projects used cam mechanisms, mechanical arms, and servo motors to move the BVM. Barotrauma from this cheap and easy design may damage the patient’s lungs. Robotic mechanisms squeeze and release the Ambu bag, but they cannot accurately control inspiration pressure.13,14

    Researchers attempted cost savings in similar ways. Modifying the bag-valve-mask (BVM) with a ventilation rate alarm system and comparing it to conventional BVMs maximized minute ventilation volume delivery.15 In a simulation model, Culbreth and Gardenhire examined RT manual ventilation performance. Ninety-eight respiratory therapists were taught to ventilate a BVM manikin for 18 breaths. Therapists with more confidence provided higher peak pressures and flow rates. Thus, BVM ventilation may injure the patient’s lungs, emphasizing the need for an intervention to just provide safe and effective manual ventilation.16 Many emergency mechanical ventilator designs were also proposed based on mechanism, shape, cost, accessibility, novel sensors, and actuators.17–20 Complex ventilator designs were also manufactured by some researchers using 3-D printing technology.21,22

    Guler et al. created a closed-loop intelligent mechanical ventilator using LabVIEW® to monitor and maintain respiratory variables to reduce clinician’s burden. The performance of device was tested with eight female Wistar albino rats using pressure-controlled ventilation.23,24 The present study standardized the mechanical ventilator design using these studies.23,24 To improve student learning, Guler and Ata created an instructional mechanical ventilator set. The training dataset controls inspiration and expiration valves and evaluates pressure sensors.25 Kato et al. studied trait–respiratory variable relationships. They examined silent breathing patterns.26 

    In volume control ventilation, preliminary ventilator configurations involve tidal volume, method of ventilation, plateau pressure, peak inspiratory pressure, and set inspiratory pressure. In pressure control ventilation, input parameters include set respiration rate, actual respirations, PEEP, and FiO2.27 Volume-targeted ventilation and pressure-targeted ventilation are used for patients on volume control and pressure-release volume control.

    A recent article reviewed gas exchange monitoring during artificial ventilation.28 Avoiding volutrauma and barotrauma from uncorrected ventilation is crucial. Thus, flow meters are essential for accurately measuring patient gas exchange volumes. Accurate monitoring of flow rate and volume exchanges is also essential to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Mechanical ventilators use flowmeters to estimate patient gas delivery using the flow signal as input to adjust gas delivery. Flow meters must meet strict static or dynamic criteria because of their importance.29 Thus, mechanical ventilators use linear pneumotachographs, variable and fixed cost orifice meters, hot wire anemometers, and ultrasonic flow meters. Micromachined and fiber optic flow meter research is growing.30 Some studies have shown that flowmeters with high sensitivity, low pneumatic resistance, compact size, bi-directional features, and immunity from electromagnetic interference can give more accurate results and lead to concise choices.31 

    Mechanical ventilation requires many simultaneous operations and is delicate. Proper planning and monitoring of all operating parameters is essential. Mechanical ventilator mismanagement during initial ventilation can also harm patients. Tidal volume, ventilation rate, IE ratio, and PEEP are simultaneously adjusted to manage oxygenation. VILI occurs in 2.9% of artificially ventilated patients and usually causes pneumonia, lifelong lung bruising, and organ failure.32 To decrease VILI risk and ensure arterial oxygen supply and acid–base balance, these ventilator settings must be optimized.33 Mathematical simulation can help us understand organ and organism-level procedures and translate scattered knowledge into medically applicable effective treatments.

    Mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients is risky. A poorly set mechanical breath can worsen ARDS-related lung injury, causing supplementary ventilator-induced lung injury. Mechanical ventilation reduces VILI and ARDS mortality.34 PEEP could be adapted to physiologic variables, usually oxygenation. Dead space, lung stress, lung compliance, and strain; ventilation trends using Computed Tomography (CT) or Electrical impedance tomography (EIT); inflection marks on the pressure/volume curve (P/V); and the expiratory flow curve slope utilizing airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) have, indeed, been tested to personalize PEEP.35 Personalizing PEEP helps ventilator settings match lungs’ pathophysiology. Novel PEEP personalization uses the expiratory flow trend during APRV.36 Expiratory duration adjusts with acute lung injury. Intrinsic PEEP stabilizes the lungs during short expiration.37 

    Guideline-based ventilator weaning reduces ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and ICU length of stay. VAP is usually diagnosed by infection control specialists. Guideline-based weaning lessens mechanical ventilation and VAP risk. Complications drop significantly in wounded and general surgical patients, but ICU length depends on medical system resources. Because of the prolonged respiratory care, ICU discharge of the patient was often delayed. VAP and impromptu reintubation are reduced along with mechanical ventilation use. Injury and general surgery patients benefit the most from the implementation of this procedure.38,39 Mechanical ventilator simulation and mathematical modeling research by Refs. 40–42 was also perceived.

    Using MATLAB®, SimscapeTM, and Simulink® tools, this study attempts to develop a physiological simulation model that describes the allocation of airflow and oxygenation in the lungs of healthy individuals and medically ill patients with ventilation issues. A simple clinical ventilator system with a real-world lungs model and patient–ventilator synchronization is simulated in this study. Mathematical modeling is used to present a system using just a mathematical concept. Computational software packages, such as MATLAB, Simscape, and LabVIEW, make it easy to study mathematical models and simulate them under varying conditions.

    Biomedical engineering relies on modeling and simulation, especially respiratory system models, which save lives. This study successfully simulated a pressure-controlled ventilator. The simulations were carried out for different test cases, which include healthy human lungs (normal lungs model); hypoxemic respiratory failure, including cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE), pneumonia (without ARDS), and ARDS; hypercapnic respiratory failure for obstructive lung disease, including acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and asthma; and hypercapnic respiratory failure for acute intracranial disorders and head injuries with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). The process for creating the mechanical ventilation model is covered in detail in Sec. II, Methodology. In Sec. III, results and discussion, the simulation parameter settings, model output for various test cases, and correlation with standard data are reviewed. A computational model of a medical ventilator and a patient's respiratory system is used in Sec. IV, or the conclusion, to demonstrate the importance of mathematical modeling in biomedical research.

    In the present study, MathWorks MATLAB and Simulink Simscape are used to create the simulation model for the mechanical ventilator. The software aids in developing a system-design platform to predict the outcome of the project with a better visualization and accuracy without bringing the prototype into actual existence and helps in avoiding the risk of a patient’s life for experimental purposes. Simulink has a vast collection of tools on Simscape to create the simulation model in domains such as electrical, gas, hydraulics, and moist air. This model is created in the moist air domain. A reservoir block is used as a source of oxygen and air. A pulse generator block is used for performing the breathing cycles. To monitor the system, sensor blocks, such as volumetric flow rate sensors, pressure and temperature sensors, and ideal translational motion sensors, are used. The scope block is used to plot the data measured by sensors. Furthermore, to control pressure, volume, flow, etc., tools such as controlled pressure sources, controlled volumetric flow rate sources, and local restrictions are used.

    Figure 2 shows the Simulink model of a mechanical ventilator in Pressure Controlled Ventilation (PCV) mode. It is based on the schematic diagram shown in Fig. 1. The model comprises a lungs model, which is a replication of the actual lungs of the patient. The model of the lungs is created in the mechanical domain to make the system more realistic. A translational mechanical converter, spring, damper, and force source model the lungs. The force source simulates muscle-induced pressure,43 and the spring and damper model the lungs’ mechanical compliance and resistance.44 Fresnel et al.43 described exponential functions for muscle contraction and relaxation pressure, Pmuscle,

    Pmuscle=Pmax1etτc,0tTtot,Pmaxetτr,T1tTtot,

    where T1 is the muscle contraction time and Ttot is the breathing cycle length. Pmax is the maximum muscle-induced pressure, and τc and τr are the contraction and relaxation time constants.

    FIG. 2.

    Simulink model of mechanical ventilator.

    Simulink model of mechanical ventilator.

    FIG. 2.

    Simulink model of mechanical ventilator.

    Simulink model of mechanical ventilator.

    Close modal

    While developing the MathWorks MATLAB and Simulink Simscape mechanical ventilation simulation model, several assumptions and limitations were taken into account. The first assumption was that all the sensors, actuators, and controllers are ideal components in MATLAB. However, in real, these components are not ideal and possess some degree of error or limitation. The second supposition is that the Simulink model might take steady-state circumstances for granted and ignore the transient effects that occur when the mechanical ventilation system starts and stops. This may have an effect on how well the ventilation system operates. In addition, the model may disregard the real-time variation of temperature, humidity, and density in the atmosphere by assuming that these parameters are constant. Whenever there is a relationship between the environment and the ventilation model components, this was mostly taken into consideration when constructing the model. The model may also imply that, unlike other electrical systems, it functions as an isolated system and does not interact with external disturbances.

    The simulation model for the mechanical ventilation system will have certain limitations because it is based on assumptions. There may be differences between the system conditions that are modeled and the actual system conditions since the correctness of the model is dependent on the underlying mathematical equations and assumptions. In addition, the model will fall short in capturing the nonlinearities and delays that are inherent in the response of sensors and actuators. The performance and response time of the system may be impacted by this. Model simplification is frequently done to increase computational efficiency, but it can have an adverse effect on accuracy by leaving out important aspects of the physical phenomenon. In certain instances, it is possible that the model oversimplified control methods rather than accurately capturing the intricacies of actual control systems. It is possible that any parameter variability was omitted, which could have an impact on the model’s performance. Although all safety precautions were taken, such as fail-safe valves and real-time gas exit to the atmosphere or reservoir, the model may not fully account for all real-world scenarios that could arise during actual operation. Therefore, additional testing of the model in real-world scenarios is necessary to avoid these limitations and close any gaps.

    For simulation purposes, the predicted body weight (PBW) and tidal volume of the patient are taken from the NHLBI ARDS Network (available at www.ardsnet.org/). The PBW is taken as 70 kg, and the corresponding tidal volumes are referred to for the validation of the model.

    ARDS is a serious lung injury with several causes. It is commonly linked to sepsis and multi-organ failure, and it is associated with increased mortality. ARDS induces diffuse alveolar injury, pulmonary micro-vascular thrombus formation, inflammatory cell collation, and blood flow stagnation. Hypoxemia and increased respiratory work typify ARDS. PEEP, high FiO2, and lowered breathing work alter hypoxemia. Often, these ARDS issues require MV. MV has been detrimental for five decades. Ventilators were adjusted to stabilize blood gas values in the late 1960s. Healthcare professionals used a TDV of 12–15 ml/kg of body weight.60 In serious ARDS, 90% of deaths occurred from pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and pneumoperitoneum.61 Amato and colleagues62 and the ARDSNet (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network)63 trial conducted in the year 2000 indicated that low TDV ventilation [4–6 ml/kg Ideal Body Weight (IBW)] seemed to be better than higher TDV ventilation (10–12 ml/kg IBW). IBW anticipates lung capacity better than weight. Recent progress in the VILI investigation has rekindled interest in lung protective ventilation strategies (LPVS).64 Recent evidence indicates that reducing the tidal volume in patients without ARDS could be beneficial.65–68 

    Four main theories describe ventilator-induced lung injury: barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, and biotrauma.65 High airway pressure causes lung barotrauma (i.e., pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum). High-TV-induced volutrauma produces alveoli overdistribution. Atelectrauma is caused by shear and strain of retractable lung units opening and closing, and biotrauma is caused by proinflammatory cytokines and immune-mediated damage from unphysiologic stress or strain.64 LPVS focus on limiting tidal volume, end-inspiratory plateau pressure (Pplat), PEEP, and FiO2.68 MV patients without ARDS have no optimal TDV.68–70 Mammalian TDV is 6.3 ml/kg.71 ARDSNet63 and other trials65–67 imply that TDV exceeding 10 ml/kg IBW is injurious. In cardiac surgery patients, a TDV less than 10 ml/kg IBW reduced organ failure and ICU length of stay (LOS), according to Lellouche and colleagues.65 A reduced intra-operative TDV (6–8 ml/kg IBW) after abdominal surgery lowered postoperative ventilatory support, pneumonia, and hospital LOS in the IMPROVE66 study group. LPVS and low TDV require high RR to retain Vm. By taking the above data into account, the input parameters provided to the model are listed in Table VII. The output obtained from the model simulation is listed in Table VIII.

    TABLE VII.

    Input parameters for the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypoxemic respiratory failure  ARDS  27  4.5  12  15 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypoxemic respiratory failure  ARDS  27  4.5  12  15 

    TABLE VIII.

    Output parameters obtained from the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypoxemic respiratory failure  ARDS  19.74  3.995  32.21  0.3333 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypoxemic respiratory failure  ARDS  19.74  3.995  32.21  0.3333 

    LPVS limit airway pressure to avoid barotrauma. Pplat estimates alveolar pressure throughout inspiration. Preventing airflow after inspiration achieves this. No Pplat is safe. Pplat must be under 30 cmH2O in ARDS. Hager and colleagues72 found that lower Pplat values improved ARDSNet outcomes. PEEP configuration and selection methods are debated.73,74 The validated and easy-to-use ARDSNet PEEP table75 is recommended for ED management.73 So, PEEP and FiO2 are provided to the model according to these data. An Fmax of 32.21 l/min is obtained during the simulation, which can be observed in Fig. 15. The pressure variation is shown in Fig. 16, where a Pmax of 19.74 cmH2O is obtained, which is less than the Pplat pressure limit for an ARDS patient. From Fig. 17, a TDVmax of 0.3333 l is obtained, which is a low tidal volume and specifically suitable for ARDS patients.

    FIG. 15.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    FIG. 15.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 16.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    FIG. 16.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 17.

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    In Fig. 18, the variation of the overall flow rate, lung pressure, and lung volume during the total simulation time is presented. A gradual increase in pressure and variation of the built-up volume as per the flow rate can be predominantly observed in the figure.

    FIG. 18.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    FIG. 18.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Close modal

    COPD patients’ airway function and respiratory symptoms worsen suddenly during acute exacerbations (AECOPD). Such exacerbations could, indeed, range from self-limiting diseases to florid respiratory failure, mandating mechanical ventilation. The average COPD patient has two such episodes per year, which use a myriad of medical resources.76 Viral diseases and environmental factors can also cause AECOPD. AECOPD episodes can be sparked or complicated by other comorbid conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, other lung diseases (e.g., pulmonary emboli, aspiration, pneumothorax), or systemic processes. In most patients, antibiotics, corticosteroids, and bronchodilators are prescribed. Certain patients may benefit from oxygen, physical therapy, mucolytics, and airway clearance devices.77 

    Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation may delay endotracheal intubation in hypercapnic respiratory failure. Invasive mechanical ventilation should avoid ventilator-induced lung injury and reduce inherent positive end-expiratory pressure. For these instances, restrict breathing by limiting the ventilation and allow hypercapnia. Mild AECOPD is usually reversible, but serious breathing failure is linked to high mortality and long-term impairment.78 PCV or VCV can be used. Setting rate and inspiratory time makes PCV better than pressure support ventilation (PSV). PCV’s patient-demand-driven flow is an advantage. PCV reduces tidal volume with increased auto-PEEP. With VCV, tidal volume does not decrease with increased auto-PEEP, but there is a risk of increased plateau pressure and overdistention. By taking the above data into consideration, the input parameters for the model are derived and tabulated in Table IX. The resulting output from the model is listed in Table X.

    TABLE IX.

    Input parameters for the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypercapnic  Obstructive lung disease  12  4.1  14.3 
    respiratory failure  (acute exacerbation of COPD) 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypercapnic  Obstructive lung disease  12  4.1  14.3 
    respiratory failure  (acute exacerbation of COPD) 

    TABLE X.

    Output parameters obtained from the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung disease  17.1  3.841  32.11  0.6084 
    failure  (acute exacerbation of COPD) 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung disease  17.1  3.841  32.11  0.6084 
    failure  (acute exacerbation of COPD) 

    From Fig. 19, it is observed that the flow rate particularly drops when the outlet valve opens and rises at the start of the inhalation process. From Fig. 20, a lung peak pressure, Pmax, of 17.1 cmH2O is observed, which is particularly safe as it is less than the safe limit of ≤30 cmH2O.79 A TDVmax value of 0.6084 l is obtained from the model as shown in Fig. 21. By making the PEEP higher, the tidal volume can be cut down even more.

    FIG. 19.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    FIG. 19.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 20.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    FIG. 20.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 21.

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    The variation of the overall flow rate, lung pressure, and lung volume during the total simulation time is presented in Fig. 22. A gradual increase in pressure and variation of the built-up volume as per the flow rate can be predominantly observed in the figure.

    FIG. 22.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    FIG. 22.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Close modal

    A person is said to have hypercapnic respiratory failure if their PaCO2 is higher than 45 mmHg and their PaO2 is lower than 60 mmHg. With asthma, it can be hard to tell when regular treatment has not worked and extra help with breathing is needed. Many people with severe asthma are young and fit otherwise, and they can still breathe even though they have to work much harder to do so.80–82 These people can keep their PaCO2 below or equal to 40 mmHg until they have been completely worn out. When CO2 is kept inside the body, serious hypercapnia and acidosis can happen quickly. So, mechanical ventilation can be used when PaCO2 is higher than 40 mmHg, or sooner if the patient shows signs of being tired. At this point, the patient is growing tired, and waiting longer to start ventilation causes even less air to get into the lungs.82 Auto-positive end-expiratory pressure and air trapping happen in individuals with serious acute asthma (auto-PEEP). The air gets stuck because bronchospasm, inflammation, and secretions make the airways less flexible. The large changes in intrathoracic pressure during the breathing cycle are caused by the auto-PEEP and the increased resistive load. This is called pulsus paradoxus. Either VCV or PCV can be used, but at the start of respiratory support, VCV is often needed. Due to the high resistance in the airways, people with very acute asthma need a high driving pressure to get the tidal volume.83,84

    Once the asthma severity improves, the patient can be transitioned to PCV per the clinician’s bias. With PCV, changes in the delivered tidal volume at a fixed pressure are a reflection of changes in resistance and air trapping. As the severity of the asthma improves, the delivery of TDV with PCV increases. To minimize the development of auto-PEEP, a small TDV (4–6 ml/kg) should be used. The tidal volume must be selected so that the pressure at the plateau is less than 30 cmH2O. The threshold of pulmonary congestion and auto-PEEP should be used to decide how fast a person should breathe. In theory, a lower rate makes air trapping less likely. However, in some asthma patients, the rate can be raised to 15–20 breaths per min without the need for a big change in auto-PEEP. CO2 stays in the body when the tidal volume is low and the rate is slow. Most of the time, it is enough to keep the pH at 7.20 or higher. Even a lower pH may be fine for young asthmatics who are otherwise healthy. Most of the time, the risk of auto-PEEP, lung damage, and low blood pressure is higher than the risk of acidosis.84 Whether or not PEEP should be used to treat asthma is a point of debate. In asthma, auto-PEEP is not usually caused by a lack of airflow as it is in COPD. If flow is not limited, adding PEEP may not be able to counterbalance auto-PEEP, but it may instead raise alveolar pressure.85 In addition, the advantage of PEEP in the case of auto-PEEP might be brought into question if the patient is getting full ventilation and is not trying to wake up the machine. When PEEP is used, lung units that do not make their own auto-PEEP may be recruited and stabilized, which could make the way air moves through the body better. Patients with acute asthma should not be given PEEP if it leads to a rise in plateau pressure and total PEEP.86 If PEEP is used in this situation, gas exchange, auto-PEEP, plateau pressure, and the way the heart works must be watched. Taking the above things into consideration, the input parameters for simulating the model are presented in Table XI. The output from the simulation model is shown in Table XII.

    TABLE XI.

    Input parameters for the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung  17  4.8  11  14.3 
    failure  disease (asthma) 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung  17  4.8  11  14.3 
    failure  disease (asthma) 

    TABLE XII.

    Output parameters obtained from the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung disease  19.64  4.051  32.52  0.4729 
    failure  (asthma)         
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Hypercapnic respiratory  Obstructive lung disease  19.64  4.051  32.52  0.4729 
    failure  (asthma)         

    The flow rate variation is shown in Fig. 23. From the figure, it is observed that the flow rate is low as per the respiratory rate of the patient and is suitable for the said respiratory condition, as discussed previously. From Fig. 24, a Pmax of 19.64 cmH2O is observed, which is sufficiently less than the recommended safe pressure for acute asthmatic patients. The plateau pressure is also within the safe ≤30 cmH2O limit.86 The PCV mode is utilized here to simulate the model. The tidal volume variation obtained from the model, as shown in Fig. 25, can be utilized by the clinician as one of the parameters for determining the severity of the patient. A TDVmax of 0.4729 l is obtained, which is suitable as per the input parameters provided to the patient.86 

    FIG. 23.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    FIG. 23.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 24.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    FIG. 24.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 25.

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    In Fig. 26, the variation of the overall flow rate, lung pressure, and lung volume during the total simulation time is presented. A gradual increase in pressure and variation of the built-up volume as per the flow rate can be predominantly observed in the figure.

    FIG. 26.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    FIG. 26.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Close modal

    Most of the time, central respiratory depression causes people with head injuries to need mechanical ventilation. ICP goes up when the amount of fluid in the brain goes up because the skull is rigid. Even though a slight increase in the intracranial volume does not cause ICP to rise, ICP goes up a lot when the intracranial volume goes up a lot. This rise in ICP cuts off blood flow to the brain, which leads to a lack of oxygen in the brain. When the ICP goes up a lot, the brain starts to swell and pushes through the tentorium. This puts pressure on the brain stem. Controlling ICP is a big part of how head injuries are treated. The difference between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the intracranial pressure (ICP) is called the cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP): CPP = MAP − ICP.

    The normal CPP is greater than 80 mmHg because ICP is less than 10 mmHg and MAP is equal to 90 mmHg. The goal CPP is between 50 and 70 mmHg. CPP should not be less than 50 mm Hg. When someone has a head injury, the ICP is often measured. Either a drop in MAP or a rise in ICP will cause CPP to go down. Because of the higher intrathoracic pressure that comes with mechanical ventilation, ICP can go up and CPP can go down. PEEP could cause MAP and venous return to go down. When venous return goes down, ICP goes up, and when MAP goes down, CPP goes down. Acute head injuries need both blood flow management and breathing management. Caution shall be exercised to avoid a high MAP, which can hurt CPP by lowering venous return (which causes ICP to rise) and lowering cardiac output (resulting in a decrease in MAP). When a patient has an ICP that is too high, the goal of ventilation is to get their oxygen levels and acid–base balance back to normal. When the pressure in the lungs goes up, the veins do not get as much blood back and the heart does not pump as much blood out.87 

    Most of the time, such patients need to be ventilated because the primary injury has caused their central breathing to slow down. In these cases, the lung function could be close to normal, and it is easy to use mechanical ventilation. When a person has a traumatic injury, they might have injuries to their chest, abdomen, or spine, meaning that they require mechanical ventilation. Because of neurogenic pulmonary edema, it may also be necessary to use positive pressure ventilation. Finally, some treatments for a severe head injury, such as barbiturates, sedation, and paralysis, slow down the central respiratory system. This makes mechanical ventilation necessary.88, Table XIII shows recommendations for the first settings of the ventilator for patients with head injuries. Oxygenation is probably not necessary for people with head injuries since their lungs usually work pretty well. At first, 100% oxygen is given to these patients, but pulse oximetry makes it easy to reduce the amount of oxygen quickly. Most of the time, a PEEP level of 5 cmH2O is a good starting point. Even though there are worries about how PEEP affects ICP, it usually does not hurt ICP at levels less than or equal to 10 cmH2O. Oxygenation is treated the same way for neurogenic pulmonary edema as for other types of ARDS, but caution must be exercised to prevent the effects of a high MAP on ICP. When a patient needs high levels of PEEP, the head of the bed must be lifted to lessen the effects of the enhanced intrathoracic pressure, and ICP should be watched carefully.89,90

    TABLE XIII.

    Input parameters for the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Permissive  Acute intracranial disorders  18  12 
    hypercapnia  and head injuries 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition RR P01 PEEP IPAP EPAP
        Breaths/min  cmH2 cmH2 cmH2 cmH2
    Permissive  Acute intracranial disorders  18  12 
    hypercapnia  and head injuries 

    The clinician’s personal preference determines whether volume-controlled ventilation or pressure-controlled ventilation is used. If the plateau pressure is kept below 30 cmH2O, a tidal volume of 6–8 ml/kg of ideal body weight can be used. Most of the time, this is not an issue since these patients have almost normal lung and chest wall compliance. If the patient has both short-term and long-term respiratory problems, the tidal volume is set lower. The right breathing rate must be selected to keep the acid–base balance in the body normal. Most of the time, this can be done by taking 15–25 breaths per min. The input parameters presented to the model based on the above data and the output from the model are listed in Tables XIII and XIV, respectively.

    TABLE XIV.

    Output parameters obtained from the model.

    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Permissive  Acute intracranial disorders  15.09  3.533  32.12  0.3511 
    hypercapnia  and head injuries 
    Ventilation strategies Disease/condition Pmax Vmax Fmax TDVmax
        cmH2 l/min 
    Permissive  Acute intracranial disorders  15.09  3.533  32.12  0.3511 
    hypercapnia  and head injuries 

    The flow rate during the inhalation and exhalation processes of the patient is shown in Fig. 27. From the figure, it is observed that the flow rate is accurately following the breathing pattern of the patient. As recommended from the previous studies, the plateau pressure should be maintained below 30 cmH2O. Here, from Fig. 28, a maximum lung pressure (Pmax) of 15.09 cmH2O is observed, and the plateau pressure is well within the limit.91 

    FIG. 27.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    FIG. 27.

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Flow of outlet and lungs (l/min) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    FIG. 28.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    FIG. 28.

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Valve and lung pressure (cmH2O) vs time (s).

    Close modal

    The maximum tidal volume (TDVmax) from Fig. 29 is observed to be 0.3511 l, which is considered a low tidal volume and generally recommended for elevated ICP patients. The tidal volume curve shows no significant deflection from the ideal TDV curve.

    FIG. 29.

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    Tidal volume (l) vs time (s).

    In Fig. 30, the variation of the overall flow rate, lung pressure, and lung volume during the total simulation time is shown. As visible from the figure, at the onset of breathing, the solenoid valve opens, and due to the high flow rate, a corresponding pressure drop and an increase in volume are observed.

    FIG. 30.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    FIG. 30.

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Flow (l/min), pressure (cmH2O), and volume (l) vs simulation time (s).

    Close modal

    In the present study, a simulation model is presented for the bulk of the individually built ventilators developed globally in response to the COVID‐19 issue. MATLAB/Simulink, a program for computational modeling, is used to develop a simulation model of mechanical ventilation systems. An examination of the operation of a mechanical ventilator can be conducted using the suggested simulation model. Through the Simulink interface, all model parameters can be monitored, and the data plots may be utilized to examine appropriate ventilation details. The model is used to test various medical conditions that require mechanical ventilation, such as hypoxemic respiratory failures, including cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE), pneumonia (without ARDS), and ARDS; hypercapnic respiratory failure due to obstructive lung diseases, including acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) and asthma; and hypercapnic respiratory failure for acute intracranial disorders and head injuries with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), and the simulation results showed a high degree of agreement with the commonly accessible data. Pmax was calculated to be 15.78 cmH2O for the healthy lungs case, which is much lower than the standard maximum value of 30 cmH2O. TDVmax was calculated to be 0.5849 l, which is much lower than the typical value of 0.700 l. In the case of cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE), a maximum pressure of 17.72 cmH2O is measured, which is lower than the typical maximum pressure of 30 cmH2O. The TDVmax of 0.5053 l is lower than the average TDVmax, which is 0.798 l. In the case of pneumonia, Pmax is calculated to be 16.05 cmH2O, which is significantly lower than the Pmax that is typical, which is 30 cmH2O. TDVmax was calculated to be 0.4256 l, which is much lower than the usual value of 0.798 l. The Pmax for the case of ARDS was determined to be 19.74 cmH2O, which is lower than the usual Pmax of 30 cmH2O. The value of 0.3333 l that was achieved for TDVmax is lower than the value of 0.497 l that is typically used for TDVmax. In the case of AECOPD, the maximum pressure measured was 17.1 cmH2O, which is lower than the typical maximum pressure of 30 cmH2O. In addition, the TDVmax that was calculated came out to be 0.6084 l, which is lower than the usual TDVmax value of 0.700 l. In the case of asthma, the maximum pressure measured was 19.64 cmH2O, which is lower than the typical maximum pressure of 30 cmH2O. In addition, the TDVmax that was calculated came out to be 0.4729 l, which is lower than the usual value of 0.798 l. The Pmax that was measured in patients with acute intracranial disorders and head injuries was 15.09 cmH2O, which is lower than the Pmax that is typically measured, which is 30 cmH2O. In addition, the TDVmax is lower than the normal value of 0.700 l, coming in at 0.3511 l. This validates the accuracy of the simulation model. Through the use of a realistic lung model and human response comparison, the simulation model provides an opportunity to assess the level of quality between the developed devices and the digital twin model. By better visualizing and accurately forecasting the results, this simulation model can aid in the prototype building of the real mechanical ventilator.

    Source link

    On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization officially declared the novel coronavirus a pandemic. The decision would change the world as we know it — how we live, work, interact with each other — and mark the beginning of a new era in which we coexist with COVID-19.

    The pandemic has since been declared over, but the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, continues to circulate, mutate and infect people around the globe.

    Although many people who have gotten COVID-19 have recovered and gone on with their lives, some have been left with persistent symptoms and debilitating health problems for which there is no cure — which we now know as long COVID.

    What is long COVID? 

    Long COVID refers to symptoms and health problems that continue, emerge, or persist four or more weeks after recovering from acute COVID-19 infection, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    It goes by several different names, including post-COVID conditions (PCC), long-haul COVID, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC).

    Long COVID is not one illness, but rather an umbrella term to describe a wide range of symptoms, conditions and diseases, which can vary from person to person.

    Long COVID symptoms commonly include fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, headaches, shortness of breath, joint pain, nerve issues, gastrointestinal problems and many more.

    The constellation of long-term health effects can affect every organ system in the body, Dr. Ziyad Al-Aly, chief of research and development at the VA St. Louis Health Care System, tells TODAY.com. “Symptoms are on a spectrum from mild to severe and profoundly disabling,” says Al-Aly. 

    The cognitive deficits associated with long COVID, such as decreased attention and memory, can be especially debilitating.

    Some patients experience slower processing speeds and diminished executive functioning, which means they may struggle to synthesize information or make decisions, James Jackson, Psy.D., neuropsychologist at Vanderbilt University and author of the book “Clearing the Fog,” tells TODAY.com

    “Executive functioning impairment is a big reason why we see so many people with long COVID who are no longer in the workplace,” Jackson adds.

    A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that people with long COVID have IQs that are six points lower on average than people who have never had COVID. The cognitive deficits can contribute to worsened mental health outcomes, and vice versa, says Jackson.

    How long does long COVID last?

    Long COVID symptoms can last "weeks, months or years," according to the CDC, and may persist or go away and come back again.

    Akiko Iwasaki, Ph.D., director of the Center for Infection & Immunity at the Yale School of Medicine, tells TODAY.com long COVID symptoms tend to last for two months or more.

    Is there a long COVID test?

    There are no laboratory tests to diagnose long COVID, the experts note. Due to the multitude of symptoms, there is no universally agreed-upon set of diagnostic criteria either, says Al-Aly. 

    “A lot of it is patient history and a process of (elimination) of other possible causes, so doctors might perform multiple different tests to exclude other diseases that could be resulting in similar outcomes,” says Iwasaki. 

    While many people with long COVID have evidence of their acute infection, such as a previous PCR or antibody test, some may have never tested positive or not know they were infected, per the CDC.

    A 2023 study published in the journal Nature showed people with long COVID may have certain blood biomarkers, signs of the condition in the body, which could be promising for developing diagnostic tests.

    However, as of now, diagnosing long COVID remains a complex and often challenging process. “A lot of times, people are being dismissed, and (told) it’s in their head or this doesn’t exist. … We know it exists, we know it’s a big deal,” says Al-Aly. 

    How common is long COVID?

    In 2022, nearly 7% of adults in the U.S. reported ever having long COVID, according to a report from the CDC. However, the true number of people affected may be higher, the experts note. 

    “We see a good amount of variation in terms of incidence rates. I’ve seen those numbers range from 5-20% of patients,” Dr. Rainu Kaushal, chair of the department of population health sciences at Weill Cornell Medicine, tells TODAY.com. “Depending on how you define long COVID, it can also affect the rates you’re seeing."

    There is an ICD-10 diagnostic code for long COVID (which is used for medical records or death certificates, for example), but this code is not uniformly used, Kaushal adds. This can also impact statistics.

    Who gets long COVID?

    Anyone who gets COVID can develop long COVID — regardless of age, race, gender, severity of infection, vaccination status or underlying health conditions.

    “We have kids with long COVID, (and) we have people who are 100 years old with long COVID,” says Al-Aly.

    Many people also get long COVID even if they didn't feel sick. “The vast majority of people develop long COVID after a mild infection,” says Iwasaki. Even if you recover fully from the first infection, it’s possible to develop long COVID after each subsequent reinfection.

    However, some data indicates that certain groups may be at increased risk.

    According to CDC data from 2022, adults between the ages of 35 and 49 were most likely to experience long COVID, and women were more likely than men to have had or currently have long COVID.

    People who had a severe acute infection, especially those who needed to be hospitalized or treated in the intensive care unit may also be at higher risk, says Iwasaki, as well as people who have underlying health conditions and those who are unvaccinated.

    Health inequities may also put people from certain racial or ethnic minority groups at greater risk, per the CDC.

    Studies have shown that compared to white adults, Black and Hispanic adults who had severe COVID-19 were more likely to develop symptoms associated with long COVID, but also less likely to be diagnosed, according to the National Institutes of Health.

    Additionally, certain groups may face greater barriers to health care, and a long COVID diagnosis, including those who are low-income.

    Vaccination and the antiviral paxlovid can reduce the risk of developing long COVID, says Al-Aly, but the only way to completely prevent it is to not get COVID-19 in the first place.

    What causes long COVID? 

    Scientists do not know exactly what causes long COVID, but there are several theories. One of the main ones is called viral persistence. “Whether the virus is replicating or remnants of viral products are persisting, that can be stimulating the immune responses which results in these symptoms,” says Iwasaki.

    The idea is that some individuals do not fully clear SARS-CoV-2 after infection, and the virus or its remnants remain in “reservoirs” in the body, says Kaushal.

    A 2023 study published in Cell showed that the gastrointestinal tract may be a reservoir for the virus, and that these reservoirs could impair serotonin production in the body, for example, which can lead to cognition-related symptoms, Al-Aly explains.

    Another theory is that the infection with SARS-CoV-2 triggers a type of persistent, systemic inflammation that takes time to resolve or in some cases does not resolve at all, the experts note.

    Scientists are also exploring the link between long COVID and autoimmune conditions. “We know that a lot of different types of infections can trigger autoimmune diseases," says Iwasaki. One example is the Epstein-Barr virus, which is linked to multiple sclerosis, according to a 2019 review on published in Viruses.

    "I think some people are suffering from autoimmunity caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection,” says Iwasaki. 

    Finally, some hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 may be reactivating other, latent viruses in the body. “We all carry multiple latent viruses, particularly in the herpes family, such as Epstein-Barr and the Varicella Zoster virus. The theory is that these can reactivate after an acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 and cause symptoms associated with long COVID,” says Iwasaki.

    Is there a treatment for long COVID?

    “We don’t have a cure,” says Al-Aly. Although this is a very active area of research, there are still no specific treatments or FDA- approved medications for long COVID, Al-Aly adds.

    Instead, treatment is largely focused on managing the different symptoms or conditions, which may involve various specialists and therapies.

    “That really represents a collective failure to find treatments for long COVID so far, going into the fifth year of the pandemic,” says Al-Aly. However, there are a number of long COVID clinics that aim to address the needs of patients. Clinical trials are underway, such as the NIH RECOVER Initiative, to evaluate treatments and find answers about long COVID.

    In the meantime, what is known is that many people are suffering, and long COVID can affect the whole body. TODAY.com spoke with six patients, who shared how their lives have changed months to years later. Read on for their stories and an in-depth look at the long COVID symptoms that they fight every day.


    Upper row (left to right): Cynthia Adinig, Sue Miller, Chimére L. Sweeney. Bottom row (left to right): Charlie McCone, Tony Marks, Joel Fram.
    Upper row (left to right): Cynthia Adinig, Sue Miller, Chimére L. Sweeney. Bottom row (left to right): Charlie McCone, Tony Marks, Joel Fram.Courtesy Joel Fram /
    Courtesy Sue Miller /
    Courtesy Chimére L. Sweeney /
    Courtesy Cynthia Adinig /
    Courtesy Charlie

    Charlie McCone, 34, San Francisco

    At the start of 2020, Charlie McCone had just turned 30, started a new nonprofit job, and moved in with his girlfriend in San Francisco. McCone was healthy and active, but after getting COVID-19 in March 2020, he developed severe cardiorespiratory symptoms, which limited his physical activity. When McCone was reinfected in 2021, he became house-bound and lost his job. McCone now suffers from extreme fatigue, cognitive issues, migraines and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

    Chimére L. Sweeney, 42, Baltimore

    Four years ago, Chimére L. Sweeney was a healthy 37-year-old working as a middle school teacher in Baltimore. But then Sweeney got COVID-19 in March 2020. In the months that followed, Sweeney developed debilitating headaches, fatigue, spinal pain, dizziness, vision loss, gastrointestinal issues, and her mental health declined, among other problems. Sweeney was repeatedly dismissed and discriminated against by doctors, and now advocates for Black women living with long COVID.

    Cynthia Adinig, 38, Virginia

    Cynthia Adinig is a mother and marketing specialist turned long-COVID advocate from Northern Virginia. After a mild case of COVID-19 in March 2020, Adinig developed a rapid heart rate; intermittent paralysis and weakness in her legs, which put her in a wheelchair for several months; esophageal spasms and tears; severe reactions to certain foods, and more. Adinig also suffers from Mast Cell Activation Syndrome (MCAS), which causes repeated allergic reactions or symptoms of anaphylaxis. After being repeatedly denied care, Adinig founded the BIPOC Equity Agency.

    Dr. Sue Miller, 50, South Carolina

    Dr. Sue Miller, 50, served as medical director of the neonatology intensive care unit (NICU) and chair of pediatrics at a hospital in South Carolina before leaving medicine because of her long COVID. While she avoided getting COVID-19 early on, she caught it for the first and only time at a conference in May 2022. About a month later, Miller noticed she new symptoms, including exhaustion, cognitive impairment, gastrointestinal troubles and pain. 

    Joel Fram, 57, New York

    Broadway conductor Joel Fram was part of the early wave of New Yorkers who contracted COVID-19 in March 2020. As he was recovering during lockdown, he noticed he became exhausted when he tried exercising and often felt so tired he fell asleep in the middle of a tasks, such as eating. He’s had COVID-19 four times but does not believe the reinfections worsened his long COVID symptoms.

    Tony Marks, 56, North Carolina

    Tony Marks has been living with long COVID for over three years. The father of two and former software executive was once healthy, active and regularly coached hockey. When Marks first contracted COVID-19 in February 2021, he had to be hospitalized for a week with pneumonia in both lungs. Marks and his doctors were initially confident that he’d recover, but he never did. The worst of his long COVID symptoms include debilitating fatigue, muscle pain and spasms, and neuropathy, or nerve damage that can lead to pain, numbness and weakness, per the Mayo Clinic.


    Brain Fog

    "Brain fog" is used to describe the collection of neurological and cognitive symptoms associated with COVID-19 and long COVID. These include issues with memory, attention and executive functioning. They can range from mild to severe and impair a person's ability to work or socialize.

    Tony Marks was the director of a software company before his brain fog and other long COVID symptoms, forced him to resign. "Mid-sentence, during a conversation, I'll just stop because I have no idea what I just told you or where I was going. ... (Sometimes) I won't recall the conversation at all, it's like complete amnesia," Marks tells TODAY.com.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    Once, while driving, Marks ended up in a random location with no recollection of how he got there. "I got in the car and my brain just entered into this mode. ... I don't remember going through stop lights or stop signs. ... (Another time) I wound up so far away from where I was supposed to be, I got out and checked my truck for dents and to make sure that I hadn't hit anything," says Marks.

    Dr. Sue Miller, a former NICU director, realized soon after she had COVID-19 she could no longer multitask. “I don’t like to call it brain fog because I think that underestimates what I have,” Miller tells TODAY.com. “It’s a brain injury. It is an infection-caused brain injury.”

    At work, Miller couldn’t complete paperwork with the door open because the hallway noise distracted her too much. She forgot nurses’ names. “I was having word-finding issues,” Miller says. “I speak much slower now.”

    With much sadness, Miller realized she needed to stop practicing medicine. “I was worried I would make a mistake,” Miller says. “I save lives. You have to be able to think fast and not be tired and not make a mistake — because seconds matter.”

    Studies have shown COVID-19 can damage the brain, and people who recover from an infection tend to have less grey matter in the brain — crucial for information-processing, per Cleveland Clinic —  than those who didn’t get COVID-19.

    Dizziness

    Dizziness and lightheadedness are some of the most common symptoms reported among long COVID patients, per the CDC.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    It was one of Chimére L. Sweeney's early long COVID symptoms in March 2020. "When I was standing up, I would feel extremely dizzy," Sweeney tells TODAY.com. It soon became difficult to walk, and showering was a monumental effort. “I was fainting in my bathroom and waking up and not knowing where I was,” says Sweeney.

    Some long COVID patients also report experiencing a type of dizziness called vertigo and impairments to the vestibular system, which controls balance.

    Vision disturbances

    Miller, the former NICU physician, says her ongoing visual disturbances trouble her. 

    “It’s called imprinting. What happens is light will stay in my eyes,” she says. “Mine lasts for a really long time.” 

    Sweeney, too, noticed her vision started to change after she got COVID. “By mid-April, I lost vision in my left eye,” she says. “It had been about six months of going to the hospital trying to seek care. I was sent home with lost vision — they could see my vision was blurry, but nobody was telling me why,” says Sweeney.

    After months of her vision loss being brushed off, doctors discovered Sweeney had dense cataracts. “I had two of them, one in each eye because of the infection, the inflammation,” says Sweeney. It took another few months for doctors to agree she needed surgery. “Now I have these dark black floaters in my eyes that impair my vision a lot,” she adds.

    Rapid heart rate, trouble breathing

    In the first few months after developing long COVID symptoms, Cynthia Adinig would notice her heart racing often "to the point where I feared I was having a heart attack,” she says. Her heart symptoms were often brushed off by doctors as anxiety, she says.

    Joel Fram says he experiences chest pain, but trying to treat his rapid heartbeat has been frustrating.

    “The cardiologist was like, ‘Well your heart rate is quite high. But your ECG is coming back normal. Your ultrasounds are coming back normal,’” Fram, a Broadway conductor, tells TODAY.com. “I was like, ‘OK, but something’s happening.” 

    Fram's heart rate often skyrockets after physical activity, so he's slowly building up his activity levels through physical therapy.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    Before the pandemic, Charlie McCone used to regularly bike 10 miles to work and back. “I got sick in March 2020, and I’ve never been the same,” McCone tells TODAY.com. After his first infection, he developed severe shortness of breath, chest pain and a rapid heartbeat.

    “I felt like I couldn’t take a breath. It was agonizing,” says McCone, adding that he could walk at most for five or 10 minutes. When he was reinfected a year and a half later, COVID-19 took a toll on his lungs and heart once again.

    "I ended up getting pneumonia, and I was hospitalized for a night. ... It was a total nightmare,” says McCone. Although his respiratory symptoms have improved slightly, McCone can only engage in limited physical activity, such as walking to another room.

    Fatigue

    Before getting COVID-19, Tony Marks was a healthy, active individual who could "do whatever he wanted to do," he says. The extreme fatigue has stripped that away from him.

    "Now, I fall asleep all the time, for no reason. I’ll be sitting visiting with people, at the pool, and I fall asleep, and nobody can wake me up," says Marks. "Next thing I know I’m waking up in the hospital because I had fallen into such a deep state of sleep (and) it was impossible to wake me," Marks adds.

    After being reinfected with COVID in 2021, Charlie McCone’s fatigue rendered him bed-bound. “I couldn’t even sit at a computer for 30 minutes,” says McCone. The once athletic, outgoing young man now rarely leaves his home except to seek medical care.

    “I have been severely housebound. I lost my job, am no longer able to work, and I rely on my partner as a full-time caretaker,” says McCone, adding that he’s seen little improvement in three years. “Now I am only really able to function for one to two hours a day to do computer work or stuff around the house,” says McCone.

    Fram, the Broadway conductor, says the fatigue felt “really debilitating. ... It’s just not something as a human being you really expect. You’re having lunch with someone and you’re literally falling asleep on them. That’s really hard to fight.”

    Fram also experiences post-exertional malaise (PEM), the worsening of symptoms 12 to 48 hours after little physical or mental activity, which can last for weeks, per the CDC.

    Fram is now trying a type of physical therapy where he does a few small movements followed by intentional breathing to try to combat his PEM. “You’re retraining your body,” Fram says. “It’s to remind your body to lower your heart rate when you’re finished exercising … but not trigger a fatigue attack with too much exertion.” 

    Tremors and spasms

    Shaking, buzzing and abnormal movements can also be symptoms of long COVID. Adinig has experienced internal vibrations and tremors that occasionally wake her up at night.

    “I’ll be waking up choking on my air, having violent tremors in my sleep, and then once I am awake, the tremors don’t stop,” she says. Although she now takes a medication that helps with her tremors, they still come and go during symptom flare-ups.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    Marks says that long COVID has left him with "thousands of muscle spasms a minute," mostly in his arms and legs. "Most of that is internal spasms but when they get really bad, I have an external shake or twitch," says Marks.

    "One time, I was at work, and out of the blue I had one in my arm. I just happened to have the (computer) mouse in my hand and it goes flying against the wall because the jerk was so bad," he recalls. Three years later, the spasms and twitching have not improved.

    In a 2023 study of 423 adults with long COVID, which Iwasaki co-authored, about 37% reported having “internal tremors, or buzzing and vibrations." This cohort also reported having a worse quality of life, more financial difficulties, and “higher rates of new-onset mast cell disorders and neurologic conditions,” compared with long COVID patients without tremors.

    Chronic pain

    Paint throughout the body, especially in the joints and muscles, is one of the main long COVID symptoms that prevents patients from returning to their old lives.

    Fram keeps a bottle of ibuprofen at the ready to help ease his swollen, tender joints, which make his work as a conductor and pianist much harder.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    “(It) requires a lot more practice to play the piano as dexterously and accurately as I used to,” he says. “When I conduct, I have always used my hands instead of a baton, but the swelling and stiffness in my joints means I have to manage a fair amount of pain.” 

    He has discomfort in his feet and legs, too: “It is very similar to restless leg syndrome, where I get uncomfortable tingling in them, and I can’t keep my feet still. My body keeps trying to shake it out.” 

    One of Sweeney’s early long COVID symptoms felt like a searing migraine. “I felt this fiery pain move from the base of my skull to the bottom of my spine. It felt like someone had poured acid, (or) lit a match down my spine. I knew that something was very wrong,” she says.

    By April, the pain moved to the left side of her face. “It felt like someone had hit me with concrete,” she adds.

    It took months for Sweeney to get a diagnosis of occipital and trigeminal neuralgia, a type of shocking or shooting pain that follows the path of a nerve due to irritation or damage, per the National Library of Medicine.

    "I have never felt anything like the pain that I felt in my skull (with long COVID),” says Sweeney. "Every second of the day, my head is hurting."

    Marks describes the pain in the muscles of his legs as "feeling like I was being beat with a baseball bat. ... It can be a dull pain or deep. I have woken up at night feeling like I've been stabbed in the legs."

    The neuropathy has also caused severe weakness in his legs. "It almost feels like I'm trying to balance on jello, the muscles in my legs are so weak and they just can't support me," says Marks. The former hockey coach often wakes up wondering whether it will be the last day he can walk on his own.

    Digestive problems

    Long COVID can infiltrate the digestive tract, leading to symptoms such as diarrhea and abdominal pain.

    Long-hauler Chimére L. Sweeney initially had diarrhea during her acute COVID-19 infection, but she now deals with chronic and severe constipation with no relief.

    TODAY Illustration / Getty Images

    "I am still so constipated that when I had a colonoscopy (recently), they could not complete the process because my body was not even adhering to the prep, after the laxatives and the fasting," says Sweeney. "I suffered and still suffer today."

    On Mother's Day in 2020, Cynthia Adinig suffered a reaction while eating one of her favorite foods, shrimp. “I felt strange, my jaw felt tight, I couldn’t swallow, my heart raced,” says Adinig. "I went to the ER and tests showed nothing alarming to the medical staff."

    In the following months, Adinig suffered from similar reactions to more foods, as well as gastric reflux and other gastrointestinal issues, but was repeatedly dismissed by doctors.

    By September, Adinig had lost 50 pounds and had to be hospitalized multiple times for starvation and dehydration, where doctors discovered an esophageal tear. "I developed esophageal spasms and I've had issues with swallowing and choking since, even on small amounts of food and water," she says.

    Although she started to recover in 2021, Adinig is dependent on antihistamines and can only eat a handful of bland foods that won’t cause a reaction. "Even like a sprinkle of pepper will trigger my reflux so badly that it's not worth it," says Adinig.

    Grief and gaslighting

    Many people with long COVID mourn who they once were.

    In 2021, Fram, the Broadway conductor, “went down a terrible mental spiral,” including suicidal thoughts, he says. “I was getting anxious and incredibly depressed. I could no longer manage it on my own.”

    He remembers crying after visiting the Center for Post-COVID Care at Mount Sinai in New York City because he "finally found" health care providers who believed him, and he could see a path forward.

    Due to her long COVID, Miller says she's had to confront "a loss of identity, the loss of my health, getting old."

    “You start to think you’re losing your mind, like this isn’t real,” she adds. “I’m not clinically depressed, but ... I’m crying because this has taken over my life. … People will say it’s anxiety. No. I’m anxious but because I don’t know what this is going to turn into.”

    A former middle school teacher, Sweeney, too, "(grieves) over how much I lost. ... I’m now retired due to being medically disabled. It's been one of the most disappointing and hurtful things in my life."

    Severe depression and suicidal ideation, which Sweeney manages with medication and therapy, are common for long COVID patients, often due to the burden of their other symptoms, Jackson explains.

    And part of this struggle may require convincing health care providers to believe you have long COVID at all.

    “I experienced nothing short of humiliation, a lot of sexism and even racial profiling and discrimination,” Sweeney recalls of being hospitalized due to her long COVID symptoms in July 2020.

    Adinig testified in front of Congress in 2022 about being dismissed: She sought emergency medical care for a dangerously high heart rate and low oxygen levels, and emergency room staff drug tested her without her consent and threatened to arrest her.

    When Miller told her primary care doctor about her long COVID diagnosis, all she offered was a hug, "which is not anything anyone wants to hear from a physician,” Miller recalls.

    Although the research on long COVID has advanced rapidly, many patients feel that these these scientific leaps have yet to translate into tangible steps for treatment.

    "It's debilitating, devastating and demoralizing ... and you deal with that every single day," says Marks.

    Source link