No strict rule about this. I personally use GENCODE www.gencodegenes.org/human/

Choice is often arbitrary. People often use either what they stumbled over first or what they find most appealing towards the formatting of the files and gene names or what a colleague advised them to use, which in turn is probably based on what the colleague stumbled over first or found most appealing.

GENCODE is more comprehensive then RefSeq. It contains more transcripts, especially non-coding ones. So if you are interested in lncRNA GENCODE might be a better choice.
RefSeq is more conservative and contains fewer transcripts.

See for a more in-depth comparison e.g. bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S8-S2

ADD REPLY

link

modified 1 hour ago

written
1 hour ago
by

ATpoint34k



Source link